Comments on: A SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF THE NAPALM DEATH SONG LENGTH TO QUALITY RATIO http://www.metalsucks.net/2009/03/30/a-scientific-investigation-of-the-napalm-death-song-length-to-quality-ratio/ IS FOR LOVERS Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:01:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jackson http://www.metalsucks.net/2009/03/30/a-scientific-investigation-of-the-napalm-death-song-length-to-quality-ratio/#comment-214533 Jackson Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:29:17 +0000 http://www.metalsucks.net/?p=13281#comment-214533 at the beginning he says longer songs are better, his favorite being Fear, Emptiness, Despair with a 210 sec avg, but at the end he says keeping them under 180 seconds is best. So which is it? On a side note I'd have to go with longer songs myself TWFNS is fucking killer at the beginning he says longer songs are better, his favorite being Fear, Emptiness, Despair with a 210 sec avg, but at the end he says keeping them under 180 seconds is best. So which is it?

On a side note I’d have to go with longer songs myself TWFNS is fucking killer

]]> By: Conor http://www.metalsucks.net/2009/03/30/a-scientific-investigation-of-the-napalm-death-song-length-to-quality-ratio/#comment-214328 Conor Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:16:56 +0000 http://www.metalsucks.net/?p=13281#comment-214328 Invisible Oranges is probably the only thing in the world I like more than MetalSucks. That is smart, smart shit going on over there for the most part. Good love. Invisible Oranges is probably the only thing in the world I like more than MetalSucks. That is smart, smart shit going on over there for the most part.

Good love.

]]>