Comments on: DEAR METAL BANDS: STOP BREAKING UP. BECAUSE YOU’LL INEVITABLY GET BACK TOGETHER.

By: drumb

drumb — Sat, 02 May 2009 19:09:10 +0000

I thought bands with dead guys didn’t count, as that’s not a ‘reunion’ then, right?

Too bad about that pus Beatles song.
How much money do these guys need; Jeez.
Though I thought the Anthology epic movie was kinda cool.

By: Eye of Newt

Eye of Newt — Sat, 02 May 2009 16:45:00 +0000

Lynyrd Skynyrd, maybe?

By: Eye of Newt

Eye of Newt — Sat, 02 May 2009 16:36:23 +0000

Possibly that fuck who took John Lennon’s vocals and put out the unfinished Beatles song 15-20 years after he fuckin’ died.

By: Eye of Newt

Eye of Newt — Sat, 02 May 2009 16:31:10 +0000

Cave In broke up?

By: drumb

drumb — Sat, 02 May 2009 03:30:34 +0000

Who do we blame for this reunion shit anyway… who did it first?
Sex Pistols?
Kiss?
Fleetwood Mac?
The fuckin Eagles?

By: drumb

drumb — Sat, 02 May 2009 03:25:08 +0000

FUCK YEAH!

By: Bill

Bill — Fri, 01 May 2009 14:09:17 +0000

i’m pretty stoked about a FNM reunion, but without jim martin, i fear it will be more “album of the year” than “the real thing”. while some of their later stuff was decent, some of the worst shit i’ve ever heard came out of those years as well (seriously, i started a joke is maybe the single worst song i’ve ever heard, even if it was supposed to be funny). wait and see……..

By: Erek

Erek — Fri, 01 May 2009 11:06:08 +0000

Bands should just use the tried-and-true Mustaine Method: fire people, hire new people, then fire those people and hire even more people. Nobody cares because you’re the main song writer anyway.

BOOM SHAKALAKA!

By: Topher

Topher — Fri, 01 May 2009 07:43:38 +0000

@ iolanach, ditto, sir, ditto. I would KILL to see that. hell, if cynic can come back after all these years, wny not them??

By: Questo

Questo — Fri, 01 May 2009 02:43:14 +0000

Very doubtful, Devin’s been pretty vocal about how he’s not going to regroup SYL. I honestly would be shocked as hell if he did.

By: matt

matt — Fri, 01 May 2009 00:28:33 +0000

why the issue with “on hiatus”? when a band goes on hiatus, that means exactly that they’re planning to reunite at some point.

By: The Daily Grind

The Daily Grind — Fri, 01 May 2009 00:20:40 +0000

Everyone is just increasingly less commitment-oriented, and it’s bleeding over into the metal world. It’s hard for bands to stay together when they eventually realize that it’s a terrible long-term career choice.

By: iolanach

iolanach — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:54:03 +0000

I’d sell my nuts for a Coroner reunion.

By: Patton

Patton — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:46:29 +0000

Sooo who’s next to reunite ? Pantera? Death? SOAD?
Dead things should stay dead, we will keep our good memories, they’ll keep whatever is left of they dignities.

By: hibernum

hibernum — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:40:36 +0000

But then what would metalsucks do for content? Amirite??

By: TrapThem

TrapThem — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:24:33 +0000

Refused should follow this trend

By: Mancubus

Mancubus — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:43:38 +0000

And now that Devin is planning on touring again (with more Devy stage banter), who thinks that SYL will be back?

By: blah

blah — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:31:58 +0000

would like to point out that cave in never started with announcing a hiatus. people saw the band turn focus to their side projects and freaked out thinking the band was breaking up, so they had to clarify saying they had no intentions of breaking up and only then used the term hiatus.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:04:11 +0000

At the Gates needs to realize that they can still make good music…
Carcass needs to stop acting like At the Gates.