SHOULD BANDS STOP PLAYING THEIR ALBUMS LIVE IN THEIR ENTIRETY?

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 at 4:00pm by

How are we feeling about this current trend of bands playing entire albums live? I remember when Slayer first did it with Reign in Blood, it seemed pretty awesome; a year or two later Metallica did it with Master of Puppets, and even though it was a pretty obvious attempt to sell fans on the idea that ‘Tallica could still rock, I’d be lying if I said that Vince and I didn’t love every minute when we saw them do it at Download in 2006. But since then it seems like every band in the fucking world has done it or is about to do it (hell, Slayer are about to do it for the second time). So this a really awesome idea that we should all embrace, or metal’s answer to 3D movies – a soon-to-be-forgotten gimmick meant only to bolster flagging ticket sales?

Former Metal Edge editor-in-chief and current MSN blogger wrote an interesting editorial this week in which he weighs in, asserting that it needs to stop. And he makes some valid points:

I don’t want to pay exorbitant ticket prices (and ticket prices have gotten fucking exorbitant) to see a band I like play an album I own in its entirety. A good set list is an art form in itself. Bands have to go through their catalog, decide how many new songs they can play without losing the crowd’s interest, then figure out a sequence that will get fans headbanging, maybe allow for a short rest break mid-set, then get them amped up again for a big finale and a wild, explosive encore. It requires real thought, and a knowledge of their strengths and weaknesses as a band, as songwriters, and as performers. Simply choosing to play a whole album removes the necessity for thought. It also takes a burden off the audience. Fans don’t need to worry about hearing a song they might not already know, or wait in suspense to see what the musicians will offer next. They can listen to the CD on the car ride to the gig, then compare what they just heard with what they hear from the stage. It’s lazy, thoughtless, and frankly insulting. It reduces the band to a jukebox, no less than if they’d taken the stage and said “We’re gonna play nothing but requests tonight. We haven’t planned a set—just tell us what you want to hear.” There’s no art to it.

I agree with Freeman that there’s an art to creating a perfect setlist, although I think he’s taking it too far to shoot down the “all request” idea – I’ve seen some bands do that, and I gotta say, it was a lot of fun. Still, Freeman may be right; it may be time for this trend to die.

Read the rest of Freeman’s thoughts on the subject here, then weigh in with your own opinion below.

-AR

  • M.

    They should stop. Unless the album is like Meshuggah “Catch 33″ or BTBAM “Colors” where the songs are meant to be one big one than they should stop this obvious cash grab.

    • Alex_P

      And even then, BTBAM played other songs from their entire catalog afterwards. The set was impressively long.

      Personally, I’m looking forward to Cynic’s tour, since their set last time I saw them was mostly Traced/Re-Traced.

      • Slaughterhouse

        I seen Dream Theater do “Metropolis 2; Scenes from a Memory” in its entirety and it was amazing. Then they came out for an encore and did a bunch of their older tunes

        • Alex_P

          Lucky bastard…

    • http://www.twistedcritic.wordpress.com Chris

      Yes, and Porcupine Tree got away with this as well, when they did “Fear of a Blank Planet”. I’m not very crazy about that album, but hearing the whole thing live was a much better experience than on CD.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brendan-Snow/514886363 Brendan Snow

        they played the first disc of “the Incident” when I saw them last month. and yeah, it was awesome, but the second half of their set was all other stuff

  • moses valenzuela

    Agreed. While cool. The only album is want to hear is a ” Greatest Hits” or the new album they are promoting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sean-Jay/1137871271 Sean Jay

    I would say that it’s a good thing when the fans want it. If the band constantly tours most or all of the songs on the album, it’s pointless. If it’s not a classic album that’s generally accepted as their best, it’s pointless. It should be something bands do VERY seldom… like every ten tours. Also, they’ve gotta be really celebrated bands like Slayer, Metallica, or Iron Maiden…. bands like, I dunno, Trivium have no business doing it.

    • Brian

      Only if the ‘celebrated bands’ are playing old albums…not like what Maiden did with A Matter Of Life And Death. But even then, it significantly cuts out other classics.

      The other condition should be that you are forewarned, like what Slayer and Megadeth are doing now. I shouldn’t show up to hear mix of hits only to be told, “Tough shit, we are playing [album] in its entirety.”

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sean-Jay/1137871271 Sean Jay

        Well I think that’s generally accepted, what with people calling it a cash grab and such. It wouldn’t be a very good cash grab if it wasn’t advertised lol

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Razza-Tu/717008242 Razza Tu

      I disagree with your final statement. The majority of Triviums best stuff came out of one album. Ascendancy would be a better setlist than the one I saw them play.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sean-Jay/1137871271 Sean Jay

        Well you actually paid to see Trivium, so your argument is invalid.

      • Carl

        Truth, although I do like a lot of their Shogun stuff. But their setlists were definitely much better before the Crusade came out.

  • Death to bro metal

    I actually love the fact that bands are playing their classic albums in their entirety. This is a way for a band, as well as the fans, to relive the golden age of that particular group. Granted, a lot of bands have followed suit but it makes for a truly memorable experience in a live setting.

    • M’Kay

      Case and point, In a few weeks I am going to see Rush go through Moving Pictures, along with other material. You better believe I will not be complaining.

  • Mike

    There is a plus-side to this, which is that you might get to hear some songs live that one might not otherwise be able to see performed.

    • Genial Gentile

      Good point. There are always those b-sides that never make it into the set list and fans never get to see live.

    • http://www.metalsucks.net/category/scraping-genius-off-the-wheel/ Gary Suarez

      Exactly. You would almost certainly hear (at least some of) the “hits” in a normal set, so hearing a “classic” album in full live is a special treat for those fans who enjoy the album and not just some of the songs.

      This concept is starting to cause grumbles, but at least for now it seems like a good way to sell concert tickets. Considering that even legacy artists aren’t really making money off of record sales these days, who can begrudge a subsection of them the right to earn some financial reward on the road.

  • Brian

    I say stop, unless you ave the energy to essentially do 2 sets. I saw Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) 2 years ago, and he did all of Dark Side Of The Moon PLUS a whole other set of music.

    I also saw Maiden when they toured for A Matter of Life and Death, adn they played that album straight through with FOUR old songs. THAT is not acceptable…

    I say, if bands feel the need to play whole albums live, new or old, they should do it in special shows, not on the tour I just paid $60+ to see.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sean-Jay/1137871271 Sean Jay

      BTBAM did a similar thing with Colors. One night they played the whole thing, the next night, they played a mix of older material. This gets the slide (since they’re not celebrated like I said should be a condition above) because it was one night only and for a DVD.

    • Carl

      I was going to mention the Roger Waters show, I think that worked out very well (besides, who doesn’t want to see a double set anyway).

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eirik-Kjs-Usterud/1067091137 Eirik Kjøs Usterud

    I’ve seen two bands do this, and both were fantastic: Slayer played a set of different songs first, then finished by playing all of Reign in Blood. It was the best thing ever. Reign in Blood is the greatest metal album of all time, and to experience it in a live setting just kicked such absurd amounts of ass. I can’t imagine MoP giving quite the same thrill – it’s a great album, but RiB is under 30 minutes of pure intensity. That’s what makes it work so great live.

    The other band I saw do this was Mayhem, who finished their looooong set at the Inferno Festival by playing De Mysteriis Dom Sathanas from beginning to end. To me Mayhem concerts are more about the physical experience than the actual music, so it wasn’t all that different from a regular set. Still, getting to hear Funeral Fog, Freezing Moon and all the other classics in a single show was wonderful – especially considering that Mayhem often focus on newer material when playing live.

  • Mr. T

    Definitely not looking forward to Slayer playing Seasons in entirety. Would really like to hear a bunch of new songs from the past 2 albums. A couple from Diabolous and God hates us All (Bitter Peace, Stain of Mind, Disciple, God Send Death, Killing Fields), a couple of classics (South of Heaven and Captor of Sin) and maybe a medley of older songs like they did a couple a years ago.

  • Death to bro metal

    Oh and by the way. which Slayer album are they planning to play in it’s entirety?

    Years ago on the Jager tour they played “Reign in Blood” and that was considered an event in the heavy metal community.

  • metalguy

    I refuse to see mastodon live till they cut that full album bullshit. They play like 5 old songs. All i would care to hear from the new album live is the 2 singles

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sean-Jay/1137871271 Sean Jay

      Well I hope they see your post and change their setlist for you.

    • ECDEU

      I saw them on their Volcom Tour and Baroness didn’t show so they ended up playing for two hours to make up for it. It was honestly one of the best experiences of my life! CTS all the way through and then practically half of every other album! It was so freakin boss.

    • Pete

      I think Mastodon are getting tired of it too. When I saw them a couple months ago, they played the CTS stuff real fast. And the second set of classics was about 10 songs strong.

      • LoomeyTunes

        when I last saw Mastodon a few years ago, before CTS they played a few songs off of every album. And a lot of the ‘Call of the Mastodon’ really early stuff. Half the people in the crowd had no idea what songs they where playing and it was a beautiful site to behold. Never heard so many so called “fans” say ‘do you know what song this is’…Its great when Brent’s so drunk he can play & sing just not carry on a conversation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ryan-Sean-Heron/9391234 Ryan Sean Heron

    i think it’s kinda trendy and unoriginal right now at the moment. but I still love the idea of it. Alot of these classic albums IMO were meant to be heard start to finish. the best albums have an ebb and flow that goes together song by song. Its very frustrating to me to hear some songs without hearing what came next on the album.

  • ferris

    No, they should play albums.

    HERE’S what bands oughtta do: They oughtta hike up their skirts, do some cardio, get in shape, and quit playing one fast song, followed by two slow ones, repeat.

    Maybe you need a break, but your fans who paid bucks to see a kickass show sure as sh*t don’t.

  • Major Zim

    yea i think it really depends on what band. like others have said, albums like Colors or Lateralus are meant to be listened to as one and are not at full potential otherwise. When i saw Masyodon, the played Crack the Skye in its entirety witha movie playing in the background of the stroy in the album. it was a great idea and the crowd loved every second. but THEN they played some choice cuts of other great songs. i think its the best way to goo about that sort of thing. also, if you organized the album well enough than playing it live should work well too.

  • MetalMeatHammer

    Yes… and start playing their discographies, or Ill stop paying 45 bones for tix.

  • http://www.myspace.com/palehorseofhell lord assenfroth

    im on the fence about it, when i heard opeth played blackwater park from start to finish i dreaded missing that. but if its a band like necrophagist or cannibal thats more about energy instead of a progressive work of art i might not be as exited about it

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jay-See/726690352 Jay See

      valid points

    • matty2fatty

      I saw one of those shows, and I found it didn’t translate all that well because of the slower material on the album. Given that though, the heavier songs still KILLED

    • Death to bro metal

      It was PERFECT when Opeth played the entire Blackwater Park album live. I was lucky enough to see the show in LA.

      • kidgruesome

        I saw the NYC show for Opeth, t’was indeed perfect. I think bands that want to play albums in their entirety, need to have a good reason. For Opeth, it was their 20th anniversary. Same with Megadeth, what is it, like the 20th anniversary of Rust In Peace? Those kinda milestones warrant something like that. Playing a new album in its entirety cause the band thinks its the shit…well it better be one goddamn spectacular record.

  • brian roach

    I think, in this age of downloading and ITunes where the album is becoming a dying art form, and anyone can burn or rip a cd and rearrange it to thier own liking (which has it’s merits, no question!), it’s cool that artists are reminding fans of the art of the ‘album’ and the flow of songs carefully selected by the artists to create a certain mood or feel. So I am in favor of it!

  • Seb

    I think all the guff against this is bull.

    Musicians should be free to present their material in the format they see fit. I think the convention suggested above by Freeman is what’s trully lazy, a fact demonstrated by the ease with which one is able to predict the “key components” of a set he’s describing. True there’s an art to it, but the result should be judged mainly based on the content, not the format. You can’t write off playing full albums as a rule just ’cause some bands suck at it. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t.

    Mastodon played their last album start to finish plus an additionnal 9 tracks from previous records in reverse chronological order. Long for those with short attention spans, enjoyable for people who like epicness. The chronologie was an onteresting component to the format.

    Fuck the Facts played “Disgorge Mexico” from beginning to end for their CD release. It’s even the subject of their first DVD. Arguably one of the best shows i’ve seen by one of the most innovative grindcore bands out there.

  • Full Metal Short Sleeve Button-up

    I’m kind of split on it. As much as I like Rust in Peace, I don’t really want to see it live. I saw Mastodon in Boston last year and I thought Crack the Skye was great live (and they did nine songs after it that time). Opeth would have been awesome to see doing Blackwater Park, but of course, they did a whole set after it too. I could care less to see Slayer do any of their albums (including Reign in Blood) and I fucking love them. I guess it just depends on the band and/or album.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trip-Cahouet/706361037 Trip Cahouet

    Now…if In Flames did the entire “Jester Race” live, that would be totally acceptable. That album from start to finish would translate well live.

    • Alex_P

      Oh man, I wish. They don’t play any of their old stuff live ever. Are them embarrassed?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dan-Burton/784250631 Dan Burton

    I’d like to see Neurosis play Through Silver in Blood in one swoop. I’d be happy to die after that. Failing that, Brutal Truth doing the whole of Need to Control.

    I remember seeing Metallica doing Master Of Puppets at Download in 2006, it was one of the greatest things I’d ever witnessed. Literally one of the best nights of my life.

  • Mark

    I just heard “Rust in Peace” live in its entirety last night. It was absolutely astounding, I’m thrilled to have experienced it, but it wasn’ the best Megadeth gig I’ve been to. I’m fine with the idea of hearing an album played in its entirety live, especially if it means I’m gonna hear songs that I may never hear in a standard setlist. I mean, what are the odds of hearing “Poison Was The Cure” outside of a special occasion?

    It was my fourth time seeing Megadeth though, I’d probably object to it if it was my only chance to ever see the band live.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jay-See/726690352 Jay See

    1. Depends on the band
    2. Depends on the album
    3. If bands mixed it up (ie. advertised specific shows as “Playing album X in it’s entirety!” and others are ‘standard set’ shows.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eirik-Kjs-Usterud/1067091137 Eirik Kjøs Usterud

      Or if they do what Slayer did: when I saw them during the last Unholy Alliance tour they finished the set with all of RiB, completely without warning. And they didn’t do it every show on the tour, either!

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jay-See/726690352 Jay See

        That would be bad ass!
        At least when Slayer plays standard sets they really mix up the material. When I saw them about 8 years ago with Lombardo on the God Hates Us All tour they definitely didn’t just cram the set full of the new album. If I remember correctly they even hit some tracks from Show No Mercy.

  • kmfcm

    Say Katatonia were gonna have Mike Akerfeldt join them on stage and play the Brave Murder Day stuff

    That’d be special.

    Mastodon playing the entire Crack Britney Skye. . . No, not really.

    • kmfcm

      Basically, if your new shit sucks, play old albums in their entirety.

      What I’m saying is, I have no reason to go see Everytime I Die unless they’re gonna play Last Night in Town.

  • http://heavystreet.com Sat

    Im still waiting for Slaughter to do their tour where they play Stick It To Ya in its entirety.

  • http://openupandsay.com Wes

    If it’s a concept album, definitely play in its entirety. Otherwise, be creative with the setlist across your entire discography.

  • BruisedMetal

    Im sure its cool to see some bands play a whole album, but in some cases no I saw Mastodon play their new album all the way through and it was cool and all but I would have rather heard more of a mix of songs seeing the their new album isnt my favorite Mastodon album… AND its just becoming a trend to play a whole album now so if every band is doing it its not so special….

  • Perpetual Black Screen Name

    Entirely agreed. This concept is seriously being compared to 3D movies? It’s an artistic decision. You probably get bored of the same ol’ thing all the time. Anybody does. So why should bands be any different? It’s not like they’re trying to re-package the live version of the album and sell it again like it’s some fuckin’ gimmick. People would still be lining up around the block to see Metallica, Slayer, Opeth, Mastodon, Meshuggah- -it doesn’t matter. People are STILL going to see those bands. No matter what they’re playing. Nobody is forcing your hand to hit the check out button on Ticketmaster. haha So stop bitching. If you really are sick of this trend, don’t go to the show. It’s that simple.

    There’s so many bands out there that are destroying any sort of future metal has and we’re complaining about the bands that gave us the foundation? Stop taking yourself so seriously, drink a beer, spark a joint, jump in the pit and enjoy yourself. The article above was written by a guy who had no story that was trying to make a point he thought was relevant when it really shouldn’t matter.

    The band makes the music, you love the music, you support it for years and then turn your back when they do something outside of the status-quo? Interesting. I need to get in on this “jumping ship’s” thing. Cos I was under the impression that when you love music, regardless of what album it’s from, you just like, continue to love that music. Hmmm, guess I have it all wrong.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Christopher-Randish/10720102 Christopher Randish

    I believe the only time playing an entire album from start to finish live should be something on par as when Opeth played its 20th Anniversary Tour:

    They played Blackwater Park in its entirety. Took a quick break, and THEN played ONE song off of each album they ever made in chronological order.

    Now that’s bad ass.

    Otherwise, it pisses me off…

    • Balls

      Greatest show ever…

      • Death to bro metal

        Hell yes

  • Steve O

    I don’t think it’s a bad idea if the album in question is, you know, good.

    For example, Cynic’s Focus is much better than Traced in Air (not a bad album in itself) and Cynic are playing that entirely. Of course, I can’t fuckin’ go but hey…

    Also the album should be at least mind-blowing and have material that is rarely if ever played live.

    While I’m on a roll, IMO Metallica have some truly great setlist picking skills, I don’t think there’s a song in their entire catalogue they haven’t played yet (though this bad in the case of St. Anger…). Don’t think anyone will be complaining about most material off of KEA, RTL, MoP or AJFA soon.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trip-Cahouet/706361037 Trip Cahouet

      I don’t think Metallica has ever played “Escape” live.

      • Matty O’Shea

        That’s because Escape sucks. You can count on going to a Metallica show and NOT seeing “Escape” or “Poor Twisted Me” or some truly horrendous songs. In the past 7 years the band has rarely put together a bad setlist. The setlist for their French For One Night DVD is incredible.

  • Vlygar

    I think it’s a novelty. A novelty that I’d love to see. The band isn’t out to surprise you so you know beforehand what you’re gonna get. If you think a ticket price is too much for a whole album live, then that settles that. Plus, most albums last from 40 minutes to an hour, so, the band should play a few extra songs before or after. Also, this doesn’t apply to small time bands who only released one album, thus only having 10 songs to play live anyway.

  • http://www.myspace.com/thestarsthrewdowntheirspears Tim

    Under these circumstances, it’s great:

    1. They’re an album oriented band. This would be awesome for, say, Mastodon, but probably not so much for The Dillinger Escape Plan (who are more song oriented, and whose impeccable shows depend on surprise in many forms).

    2. They play a second set of other songs.

    I saw Mastodon, Porcupine Tree, and The Decemberists all do this in the past year, and if the material and the performers are good enough it makes for a wonderful concert experience.

  • Balls

    Bands should not do it over multiple tours (eg- Mastodon). It was epic the first time, the second time was great, third time was good, but somewhat trite.

    Certain bands should do it for a tour then, maybe again in 5 or 10 years when everyone forgets about the first one. Such as Opeth. Seeing Blackwater Park and The Funeral Portrait live… is giving me goose bumps just thinking about….

    I agree that only certain bands should do it with specific albums as well…I would have killed a man to see Isis play Oceanic…

    • kidgruesome

      Funeral Portrait….yes! They tore that shit up.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alejandro-Aldana/683878171 Alejandro Aldana

    i think playing an album in its entirety is good when done wisely, an example being cynic’s upcoming tour, which i will be attending =D.

  • Cokane

    If the album is an all time classic,i don’t see any problem about the band playing it live in it’s entirety.

    Plus,americans and europeans get to see most of these bands every year or so,so what’s the problem in making it different every once in a while then play the old washed-up hits with some new songs in between? Some people just have to complain about EVERYTHING,jeezus.

    • caleb

      i agree, this prick is just trying to find fault with something awesome and coming off as sounding like an arrogant douchey dorktool

  • Honeynutzz

    Why do bands even write albums? Maybe they should just right set lists. It’s not like bands are going out and doing this every tour. So what they want celebrate an album release and play the whole thing. So it’s great for fans of the album and plus you probably get to hear a few songs a band might never consider putting in their set list.

  • http://www.heavyblogisheavy.com/ Alkahest

    Didn’t read the article, but my answer to the question is no.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Anthony-P-Stine/1314021455 Anthony P Stine

    Yeah, bands should and probably will stop doing it, unlike with 3d movies (which are no fad) which are not going away.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Derek-Binsfield/681013316 Derek Binsfield

    My theory: If a band is touring such as Mastodon, and they have not been in your town since their new album as been out, Crack the Skye followed by some older songs is more than acceptable.

    In fact, BTBAM is rarely in my hometown and I’d absolutely love for them to come back and play all of Colors or even the Great Misdirect, followed up with a few older SHORTER songs.

    A band having long-ass songs plays their full album, then some shorter songs are necessary to make the show more interesting.

  • g man

    Simply choosing to play a whole album removes the necessity for thought. It also takes a burden off the audience. Fans don’t need to worry about hearing a song they might not already know, or wait in suspense to see what the musicians will offer next. “.

  • g man

    . Fans don’t need to worry about hearing a song they might not already know, or wait in suspense to see what the musicians will offer next. “. When was the last time a set list wasn’t posted minutes after the first show of a tour ? Before the internet , it was – go to the show and see what happens. Now you can find the set list for Iron Maiden’s latest tour and complain about it before they get to the next gig. Waiting in suspense…really ?

  • Sambo

    When I went to see Dethklok/Mastodon, I was excited to hear them play a lot of their old stuff. First it was Oblivion and then it was Divinations. So I was thinking OK get the recent singles out of the way. I was wrong. I was getting bored to tears after their set ended. I was very disappointed to know that they played Crack the Skye in its entirety, which totally avoided a purchase from me. It wasn’t that great to me. I was so glad when Dethklok finally played.

    The Faceless played their entire “Planetary Duality” CD in its entirety and played An Autopsy as the Encore I believe. THAT however was great!

  • Ian

    I agree with the general consensus that if the album was meant to be played as one piece, then by all means, just play that album in its entirety at a show. On the other hand, I saw Mastodon play Crack the Skye in its entirety and a few others at the end (they played The Bit), and although some may argue that the album is supposed to be played as one, I found it took away from the show. Dethklok played after them and their set-list destroyed. The suspense of the next song a band will play is what makes going to a concert worthwhile.

  • Anthony

    Do it once, even if you aren’t a “classic” band, then never do it again.

    The fact that Slayer is doing it for a 2nd time is ridiculous. Then again even at a regular Slayer show I can’t tell when one song ends and the next one starts.

    • Cokane

      Maybe you should go listen to Coldplay,then.

  • ElBino24

    I have no problem with bands doing this, since there’s been many a high time when I sit there wishing that whatever album I’m listening to would be played in its entirety. I think bands should merely pay attention that they play an album that’s generally liked (like BTBAM with Colors and the Faceless with Planetary Duality) rather than pull a Mastodon and end up playing Crack the Skye (snore!)

  • http://piercingmetal.com/wordpress/ PiercingMetal Ken

    I think it depends on the band and then the album that they are choosing to celebrate in its entirety. When KISS recently toured they were lauding the fact that the entire “Alive” album would be played. I was good with that since its the sum of three vintage KISS releases, but by the time it got to NYC it had changed a little. Priest celebrating the 30th Anniversary of “British Steel” was worthy since that was a milestone but outside of bands like this it started to become “oh who’s doing this next”.

    I think I would prefer the killer set list more than an album revisit these days because that finds the band being more concerned about what to play for their fans as opposed to just pressing play in some sense and going on automatic until it was time to add more selections to the mix.

  • Freedom35

    Only if its an old band who hasnt released anything good in years anyway (ie. Slayer, Metallica).

    The only band I can think of that I would like to see do this is Converge for Jane Doe.

  • enemyofgod72

    For most bands I would say, yes, stop playing albums in their entirety live. Slayer to me is actually an exception and the only reason being that their albums are generally pretty short like sub-40 minutes. Due to their albums being that short it still leaves them plenty of set time to play anything else they want. Most albums aren’t good enough to play in their entirety anyway. I have and I’m sure most readers here have very few albums that we don’t skip at least one or 2 tracks on. If I skip over it in the car I probably don’t want to hear it live. I think it would actually be pretty cool for any band to let the fans pick the entire set. They might be surprised by what their fans actually want to hear or rather don’t want to hear. How about a Metallica set without “Nothing Else Matters” or “Enter Sandman”? Sounds good to me.

  • James

    I think one-off special occurences are fine, like when slayer did reign the first time, but not every night for the whole tour

  • BC

    The Idea of playing whole albums live is growing tired, yet I still love it. I mean if I was told that say umm for example Arch Enemy was going to play all of Anthems Of Rebellion sure I like some of those songs but the whole album? nah I’ll pass

    On the other hand if someone Told me BTBAM would do Colors or that Converge would do Jane Doe (Or Axe To Fall or No Heroes or When Forever Comes Crashing) Or Opeth doing Blackwater Park again or Mastodon with Crack The Skye or Meshuggah with Catch 33 some albums are best enjoyed front to back and when that is the case yes please play it live I would love nothing more. but those are the only times it is REALLY acceptable.

  • DustintheWind

    Coheed and Cambria did it right with Neverender. Make it a special event, one time deal that you play an album (or in their case, albums) in their entirety. It worked amazingly with Coheed because one, their albums tell a story and flow together. And two, only die hard fans who were super stoked on the idea were there. I totally understand the argument against this trend but personally, the Neverender shows were some of the best concerts i’ve ever been to.

  • Harold

    Only way I’ll ever hear Skeletons of Society, Spirit in Black, Temptation, and Five Magics, Poison was the Cure Live. Classic albums only.

  • Fufkin

    Should be South Of Heaven.

  • Brian Koz

    As stated previously, it really depends. I think it’s only good on occasion and it needs to be a classic album with GOOD songs that either haven’t been played in a long time or haven’t been played at all. Shows I would like to see includes Devin Townsend doing Ziltoid, Danzig doing How The Gods Kill, and Fear Factory doing Obsolete or Demanufacture. I think it’s best to do concept albums live, and then making the stage show match with the story/theme. Once again though, this should only be done once in a while, not every single tour bullshit.

    • Brian Koz

      If the original lineup of Napalm Death reunited for one show/tour and did all of From Enslavement To Obliteration I would cry. In the most metal way possible.

  • LoomeyTunes

    I am seeing Yo Gabba Gabba this winter with my daughter, I hope to god they dont play ‘St. Anger’all the way through.

  • dan nash

    ive seen megadave do it, and slayer do it, and thought it translated well. i think it also helps if the bands doing it have been around for more than five years.

  • brandonmetal

    eh, give the fans what they want, whatever that is.

    it would be cool for soilwork to do steelbath suicide, though…

  • Nick

    I have mixed feelings on it. I’ve heard that Mastodon has now done 4 or 5 tours where they played Crack the Skye in it’s entirety. That’s too much. They had a very large fanbase long before that album was released. On the other hand, I would kill to have been able to see Isis play ‘Oceanic’ live. And I don’t mind having seen crack the sky once. Moderation

    • Nick

      *Crack the Skye

    • Jeffy The Sea Serpent

      Too much? I’m sure if you actually saw one of the shows instead of hearing about it, you would think otherwise. Mastodon played an entire set of pre-CTS material, and while each song was playing, an animated version of the song’s album art was behind them. When they finished the set, and cued the encore with the CTS artwork appearing behind them, it was magical. They played the whole record AS THE FUCKING ENCORE. If that’s not getting your moneys worth, I don’t know what is.

      • Jeffy The Sea Serpent

        Conclusion: Playing entire records live is rad as long as it isn’t the ONLY thing you play.

  • Crusty Hippo

    I saw Opeth for the 20th anniversary in NYC and they played the whole Blackwater Park album. I thought it was amazing, considering Dirge For November, and The Drapery Falls are big favorites of mine.

    If they consistently did it, I could definitely understand the weight of this argument. I think for special occasions, like celebrating 20 years, is great! But like the way Mastodon has been doing it, (Especially since it seems like it’s pretty rough to pull off exceptionally live)? Nah.. That gets too bland too fast. Fortunately, the concert I went to last year of Opeth, they didn’t do a whole album front to back, so I commend them for that.

    I honestly can’t think of anything worse than going to a concert and the band plays a whole album live, all the time. ESPECIALLY if it’s an album you DON’T like.

    If I went to a Meshuggah concert, pumped and ready to hear and see some of my favorite songs, and they say, ‘We’re gonna do Contradictions Collapse in it’s entirety!!’, Well I’d be pretty disappointed. Mainly because I’m not a big fan of that album. But that’s my tastes, and they’re completely irrelevant. Simply an example.

  • BRAman22

    I think this is ok but only if they do it with their best album. This means that I’m fine with Megadeth doing Rust in Peace but don’t think that Slayer should do Seasons in the Abyss given that it is not their best album. (Me saying that about Megadeth is just because I’m kinda pissed about it and I’m trying to convince myself that it will be good.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sara-Petrocelli/519197405 Sara Petrocelli

    What’s wrong with playing an album? I’m the type of broad that listens to the albums in their entirety and to get to see the band play it is even better. Albums are very lost art form. People don’t appreciate them and I don’t get it. My friends get in the car with me and skip songs on my CD player because it’s the album. NO. NO. NO.

    Now, bands shouldn’t do it ALL the time, but sometimes is pretty killer, especially with a great album. When I heard Megadeth was playing Rust in Peace, I was pretty excited. Bitchin’ album. It’s not like they’re not playing other stuff too. The album bandwagon is probably growing tired, but if I see a band more than once, I don’t want to see the same greatest hits show.

  • http://www.metalsucks.net/category/scraping-genius-off-the-wheel/ Gary Suarez

    LEAVE UNSANE ALONE