WHY DO LABELS RE-ISSUE SO MANY ALBUMS?

Monday, November 15th, 2010 at 2:30pm by

at the gates reissueEarache head-honcho Digby Pearson recently penned a column on his “straight talk” blog Ask Earache about why labels put out so many re-issues. If you’re at all familiar with Earache you know full well that they’ve been completely re-issue crazy over the past several years, putting out what seems like a dozen re-issues each of albums by At the Gates, Godflesh, Carcass, etc, so an explanation from the man behind the curtain himself is quite telling:

The truth is that re-issues offer labels a quick and relatively risk-free boost to their income. They do pretty good business, and we don’t really know why- maybe its because the casual fan always wants great value before they spend their hard earned money, which is fair enough. In our experience, the diehard fan buys it for the music, the casual fan waits for a 2xCD great value package to appear. Over the course of an album’s release cycle, we try to cater to both.

Candor! Of course there are some other added benefits that you might not have thought of:

Actually there are 2 distinct types of re-issues on Earache, and the motivation to do them is different in each case. 1) Numerous old ‘classic’ bands from Earache’s early period have reformed recently – Sleep, Brutal Truth, Godflesh, Carcass, At The Gates etc – mostly they have reactivated themselves as headliners to take advantage of the lucrative modern-day touring circuit which rewards bands now much more than when the bands split up.Consequently their back catalog deserves an audio spring clean and EQ boost to suit the tastes of the modern metal audiences for whom every extreme metal band nowadays must boast a crushingly loud production to be taken seriously and 2) upcoming bands – say Evile, Municipal Waste- who simply need a boost of sales to give their career a shot in the arm.

In the case of newer bands, most of the music business still ranks and rates bands on the number of CDs sold via ye olde recorde shoppes, known in the USA as Soundscan. A cleverly-timed re-issue (say round a highly visible tour supporting a major act) can give a newbie band a much needed spike in Soundscan numbers. The aim is to persuade fans to make a purchase, this will make agents, promotors and festival organisers take notice of a new act.

So there you go. If you’re one of the grumpy gusses who always complain about the multitude of deluxe or re-mastered re-issues, like me, then stop buying them. There’s clearly a market for them. And hey, if Earache can pad their bank account with 10,000 unit sales without the recording and marketing costs associated with a new release, that’s more money they can put into developing new bands. Which is great, as long as they aren’t re-thrash.

-VN

  • http://www.schenkeltown.com Schenkeltown

    it’s easy $$$$$

    • CrownofWorms

      True, but at least it gives people who were to young to even notice or people who missed the chance to get classic records of less known bands like At the Gates and also gives another nice treat with the whole 2 disc thing

      • Slaughterhouse

        I agree. There are plenty of bands that I didn’t know about until after they were defunct.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vince-Edwards/184804344 Vince Edwards

    There’s also the issue of re-pressing catalogue titles and just doing it as a deluxe re-issue or redoing the art because it’s so old that it no longer exists. When we re-issued the four King Diamond albums, the old art had to be re-created from scratch and it was done simply because inventory was gone on the old titles. It had to be “re-introduced” into the system.

    • Sacajawea

      There can never be too much King Diamond in this world. Anything relating to King Diamond will get my seal of approval.

    • huntermc

      At least he’s honest about everything! It’s not like the labels are ripping anybody off by issuing a deluxe version, nobody’s forcing you to buy it. And even if you already bought the original, what’s the big deal if you spent like $12 extra to support a band you like?

      • Jon Miguel

        Cause you’re not sure how much is going to the actual band.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Vince-Edwards/184804344 Vince Edwards

          The standard royalty rates apply. Each band has their own deal. You can bet that the older and more established the band is, the better their deal will be.

  • anhero

    I can’t wait till the Earache Classic reissues of Oceano’s records!

    • CrownofWorms

      It makes me feel like shit to be a Chicago metalhead to know that this is so far the only labeled metal band from Chicago.

      • Captain Wookie

        It is sad to think about, I think probably the best thing I have seen from Oceano (and I use that very loosely) was the 2006 Ozzfest. No, they weren’t playing but early in the morning during Full Blown Chaos watching their singer get absolutely owned in the pit. Now there is a chance that it wasn’t him but it makes me feel better thinking it was him.

  • zulcon

    It’s funny that Digby seems to think hypercompressed “remasters” are what metal audiences want, and not simply what the label wants in order to sound “competitive.” I will probably not buy any reissues until 2017 when dynamic range is back in vogue and they roll out the “Pristine and Untouched” reissues, where the audio is identical to the original release (but for triple the price).

    • Ziltoid

      I sense a bit of sarcasm in his tone. He damn well knows that he’s contributing to the loudness war, and he damn well knows that loudness sells.

  • ittoa666

    It will atop being worth it when I stop getting dvd’s. The at the gates one was actually the first time I bought that record, and I love the bonus stuff.

  • SandEater

    Reissues don’t bug me too much. Seeing that the albums they’re reissuing have already seen a good 10 years of hell in my CD player. It’s nice to walk into a music store and see it on the shelf.

    The Amon Amarth reissues are kinda annoying when you already own the multi-DVD live thing they released. Now they just take one of those live discs and just stick it in with the reissue.

    I don’t like it too much when they re-produce the album. I dig the purposely bad production of the good ol’ days. ie. Dissection’s Storm of the Light’s Bane

    What I don’t like is when they release the bonus track/super artwork/fancy album cover like 2 weeks after the original release. If they came out the same time I’d buy the nicer packaging. But then they up the price like $6-7. Drives me nuts.

  • r

    In my case the lack of special physical editions of the new Deftones, Alice in Chains and Them Crooked Vultures has stopped me from buying those. I want the records, but I don’t want to pay more than once for them (like Crack the Skye and The Blackening – 2 times each-)

  • http://jaydinitto.com Jay

    People buy them.

  • Plasmaterial

    I originally purchased At the Gates’ Slaughter of the Soul back in about 2005-2006. Just the standard CD edition — and I think it contained the bonus tracks. Then a year or two later it was reissued with a bonus DVD — so I bought it again. Then again a year later (when they did the Wacken tour) it was reissued again with the same DVD but this time containing “an extra 30 mins of never before seen footage” or some shit like that — so that is where I drew the line. Plus if you are going to reissue a classic album, don’t EVER reissue it in a shitty jewel case – stick it in a nice, fat glossy digipak or at least a slip case (ala Death’s Symbolic and Cynic’s Focus).

    However, the Amon Amarth reissues from Metal Blade were perfect for me as I only ever owned Twilight and Oden, so it was good to get their first 4 albums in beautifully packaged digipaks.

    I also remember the constant criticism Roadrunner copped several years ago about the fact they always reisssued their albums 6-12 months after it was released. Now, they release the special editions when the album first gets released and it works so much better now. Gotta keep the consumer happy.

  • yzermantiis

    I do enjoy when labels re-release hard to find albums. For example Crowbar, Drudkh, Agnostic Front, etc……

  • Brian Roach

    my problem with Earache is that it seems like the majority of their re-issues are for the older bands, who aren’t on the label anymore, got royally screwed over by Earache, and generally hate them. So they have no say in it, which just seems wrong!

  • Dez

    Fuck these assholes! I work in a record store and half the fucking orders I get are re-issues. And then my boss wants counts on the non-reissue ones, so he can order more of those!

    Digby is a stupid douche and I hate him, as well as any other person who thinks its ok to produce 3402850238 re-issues a year.

    Also, stop making your CDs louder, you fucking twats. It sounds like shit.

  • wata

    I only buy them if they have nice packaging and extras (photo books, posters, stickers, etc.) besides just the CD coasters.

  • columbo

    But why do they throw all kinds of demos and shit in there? When I listen to slaughter of the soul, it’s supposed to end after “flames of the end” I don’t want to hear some shitty slayer cover from a 1992 tape!