Quantcast SUMERIAN RECORDS' ASH AVILDSEN: "ARRRGH, DON'T BE A PIRATE!" - MetalSucks
R.I.P. Corey Mitchell
mj then and now

Video: Michael Jackson's Thriller Performed in Twenty Different Vocal Styles

michaelkeene

BREAKING: Michael Keene's Stinky Butt to Blame for Recent Faceless Member Departures

Robb Flynn photo credit: Nigel Crane

Robb Flynn Calls Out MetalSucks Commenters for Being Idiots/Awesome

Robb Flynn photo credit: Nigel Crane

Machine Head's Robb Flynn Trolls Children of Bodom's Alexi Laiho

mj then and now

Video: Michael Jackson's Thriller Performed in Twenty Different Vocal Styles

michaelkeene

BREAKING: Michael Keene's Stinky Butt to Blame for Recent Faceless Member Departures

Robb Flynn photo credit: Nigel Crane

Robb Flynn Calls Out MetalSucks Commenters for Being Idiots/Awesome

News & Tips?

Drop us a line at news@metalsucks.net

White Collar Criminals

SUMERIAN RECORDS’ ASH AVILDSEN: “ARRRGH, DON’T BE A PIRATE!”

By Vince Neilstein

Sumerian Records co-founder Ash Avildsen published a ballsy video yesterday in which he presents some facts and his own opinions on the issue of music piracy. Since Ash instructs listeners at the very beginning to “take 3 minutes of your day to listen to this message with an open mind, and then decide for yourself how you feel about the subject at hand,” I figured I’d do just that.

So… first, watch the above video.

OK, ready? Now let’s dive in.

What Ash gets right:

  • He admits that spreading music for unsigned bands can be a great tool for them.

What Ash get wrong:

  • Simply distinguishing between “signed band sharing = bad” and “unsigned band sharing = good” leaves too much gray area. What about bedroom indie labels? What about labels that are slightly bigger than bedroom indie labels? And labels that are slightly bigger than those? In increments all the way up to major labels? Or what about brand new bands on bigger labels who release singles / EPs for free? In order for Ash’s argument to carry any weight, I think he definitively needs to say “all sharing is bad” (or conversely “all sharing is good”), otherwise he’ll become trapped by his own argument when a band that doesn’t fit his mold for sharing or not-sharing comes along.

What Ash gets right:

  • He does a great job of striking down the widely-believed fallacy that bands aren’t hurt by music piracy and concisely explains the concept of recoupment. He also does a good job of explaining why record labels are important in today’s music industry ecosystem by enumerating the many ways in which they spend money on promoting bands and bringing their music, videos, tours, etc to the masses.

What Ash gets wrong:

  • That argument assumes record labels can and will always be the only source of financial backing for a band. As an owner of booking powerhouse The Pantheon Agency (they do Summer Slaughter, Thrash and Burn, and 100 metal bands you’ve heard of), and seeing as Sumerian Records is co-owned by a partner in Outerloop Management, Ash should know this better than anyone. The reason all three companies have been so successful recently is because the synergy between all three keeps all bases covered and money flowing in from all angles.
  • That argument also assumes that the sale of recorded music is the only way a record label or any financial backer can make money. I may be wrong on this, but I’m pretty sure Sumerian issues at least a few merch items for every release they put out (and surely shares in the profit of those), and via Pantheon and Outerloop they’ve got direct or indirect back-door revenue coming in from both live shows and, via management, every stream of income a band has.

What Ash gets right:

  • He makes a really good point about the corporate ads on music piracy (rapidshare, megaupload, etc) and torrent sites that have nothing to do with music, from which bands never see any money. Honestly, I never even thought about this and it does make me angry.

What Ash gets wrong:

  • This point is severely undermined by the fact that this video is basically a giant ad for Born of Osiris’ new record, released the same day as this video. I think it would’ve held more weight if he simply stuck to numbers and charts and released it on any random day. If he’s railing against those site owners for masking their true intentions, he’s got to be consistent with his own message for his argument to carry any weight. If this is about music piracy, have it be solely about music piracy without bombarding the viewer with images of BoO’s album art. That I’m helping promote said ad with this post is not lost on me, but the tone of Ash’s statement and what I’ve heard of his opinions on the matter in the past strike me as way too earnest for this to simply be a promotional ploy.

Additional comments: I’m not arguing that music piracy is “right.” It isn’t. It is definitely stealing. But it simply “is”… it exists, it’s here, it’s not going to change, and the Internet has made it such that the way we consume and view music has been altered forever. The belief that CDs, or even legal digital file ownership, are going to make a magical comeback is akin to thinking the horse and buggy will soon become the preferred mode of transportation in America. In a perfect world musicians, artists and all creative types would be millionaires while politicians, bankers and lawyers would have to scrap for pennies.

But this is not the case. You know why? Because music was never supposed to get anyone rich or even earn them anything more than a very modest living. The period lasting roughly from 1930 through 2000 was the apex of a bell curve in the history of music due to the happy collision of humankind’s technological ability to reproduce audio recordings and our inability to do so efficiently; now that we can do so more efficiently, things go back to normal. Never before has it been possible to earn so much money on art, and it never will again. It was good while it lasted, but it’s over.

The silver lining here is that because of said efficiency it’s easier than ever to produce music and get it out to the masses. It drives me CRAZY when people say art will suffer without the monolithic industry behind it… art will be just fine, just as it was for the hundreds and thousands of years before it was possible to put music on a physical product and carry it around. Only it’s even better now — recording technology is so cheap and Internet access so widespread, it’s easier than it’s ever been to record and get your music out there. Just look at all that Periphery — now a Sumerian act — was able to accomplish before ever being signed, without the benefit of hundreds of thousands of dollars in studio equipment and without a marketing campaign or publicist. Misha Mansoor’s drive and ambition and, most of all, talent, got that band where they are.

End rant. Now it’s back in your court, Ash. Go! (srsly… I’ll run a response if you write one up.)

-VN

Sponsored Links from Across the Internet

About the Author

Vince Neilstein

Vince Neilstein is a co-founder of MetalSucks and enforces a strict no-pants rule at the office.

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mikey-Vee/502827008 Mikey Vee

    LISTEN

    I DIDNT GET PAID UNTIL THE 20TH, AND THE PRE ORDER STOPPED ONT HE 17TH

    PLUS, YOUR SHOW IN OTTAWA IS FUCKING SOLD OUT

    IM FUCKING SORRY, I SWEAR TO FUCK I WILL PAY FOR THIS SHIT hahahahahahahahahahahah this album fucking kills btw hahahahahahaha

  • Deth

    Good article and valid points. I actually wrote my masters thesis (for marketing) on the topic of downloading vs. purchasing.

    That being said, I’m not one to download a lot of music (at last count I had over 1000 CDs) but it’s based on the individual’s level of satisfaction. Some are happy having the music and instant gratification while others, like myself, don’t mind a wait and like having the packaging. I understand how little money the band actually receives for CD sales (smaller bands average 2-10 cents a disc profit) so unless a group is moving large quantities of physical product they aren’t going to make a lot.

    Unfortunately downloading is a necessary evil in some cases. The method in which CDs are distributed (European releases are coming out months before the US or discs are limited to one country of release period) or their lack of even existing makes it difficult to avoid getting a digital copy sometimes. Take, for example, the back catalogue of Anacrusis. Up until recently, there was no way to obtain their first two albums (outside of cassette) without downloading.

    Using that example, I think the band did the one thing that most bands should do, they allowed you to download the albums for free on their website. This can be a good marketing strategy since it gets people to visit the site and maybe buy legitimate merchandise. Rather than complain about illegal downloads, maybe labels should embrace the fact that it exists and try to use it to their advantage. Complaining about it only draws more attention to the practice and gives the listener a mental note to go find an album illegally. Instead, post some songs on a website, encourage users to come check out the tracks and hopefully that will lead to future purchases or seeing a band on tour – where more money is made.

    Downloading is not going away, plain and simple. Embracing rather than condemning may be something to consider. Most money is made from touring and merchandise sales so you have to weigh name recognition and concert attendance versus financial gain sometimes. I’m not saying this methodology applies in every case but it’s an alternative that many are not even willing to consider.

    Let’s face it, unless you’re a heavy hitter like Slayer or Metallica you just aren’t going to make a lot of money in the metal industry.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Michael-Hurley/720394423 John-Michael Hurley

      I’d like to read your thesis if you don’t mind, it sounds pretty awesome.

      • Deth

        It was lost in a hard drive crash, unfortunately. But I do have a paper copy. If I can get it scanned to PDF this weekend I can send you a copy. It’s really not that interesting. It just applies downloading, buying, and the music industry as a whole to different marketing theories. It is really simplistic, to be honest, and not one of my crowning academic moments – lol.

        • Clint

          Is it ironic that someone defending illegal downloading lost their “masters thesis” in a hard drive crash and the only copy is physical? I’m being serious, I really don’t know.

          • Deth

            lol, yes it is ironic. I never thought about it that way.

            I actually found a digital copy digging around last night in an old backup. It’s not the final paper but it was the second to last draft. Shoot me an email if you want a copy – farnethb@battelle.org (it is my work email so watch what you send). And again, it’s not exactly and enthralling read but it is what it is.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kyle-Dolan/100000510289061 Kyle Dolan

        Agreed. I’d enjoy a read.

        • Clint

          Slayer and Metallica are “heavy hitters” because people actually BOUGHT their stuff. It takes time and MONEY to develop into what Slayer and Metallica are. You WOULD NOT have Reign in Blood/ Master of Puppets if the members of those bands had to have day jobs while writing those albums. Haven’t you wondered why we haven’t had any “heavy hitters” develop in the last ten years? The ONLY thing that has really changed is illegal downloading.
          That’s the thing that bothers me the most about stealing music. It makes music essentially valueless (which it is not). You can take as much as you want, and it’s free. Like seashells at the beach. Who do you know who gives a fuck about seashells? Nobody? I’m sure there are a few people out there who would pay for a really pretty one, take it home put it on a shelf and forget about it. And that’s the rub right there. I know for a fact that when I bought an album when I was a kid, I spent about three hours bagging groceries for it. I had skin in the game. It cost me something I valued: my time/money. So I choose it carefully and spent time with it. That DOES NOT happen today. That’s why there are no Iron Maidens or AC/DCs today. Nobody spends any real time with music anymore because it’s become “worthless” in a sense. That is the true cost of stealing your music. Millions of people have cheated themselves out of one of the most amazing experiences you can have in life: an album you didn’t understand revealing itself to you. The way it works today, no real bonds are created between the listener and the music. But, hey! You’ve got a cell phone, right? What the fuck do you need with profound experiences?
          Downloading is the way most people consume music RIGHT NOW. How will it be consumed next? All you morons do realize there is a NEXT, right? Zuckerberg and Google are commies right NOW. That “Everything should be owned by everyone, everything should be free, everyone should have access to everything ” bullshit WILL NOT last. Because that IS NOT the way the world works. This generation, like every other generation before it, will get greedy. They’ll want a nice house, a couple of nice cars, and their kids college payed for. When they do get greedy, FUCKING LOOK OUT! ALL THIS FREE SHIT WILL DISAPPEAR!!!

          • http://twitter.com/stuffuyouwillhate Sergeant D

            tl;dr

            ps U MAD

          • Nick

            You’re an ignorant idiot. Congratulations.

          • Deth

            Um, wow. Relax. Breathe.

          • http://www.synergistband.com Cutch

            You should take into account the fact that in the last decade the cost to make a great sounding record has gone down significantly as well…

          • boomshanker

            Hmm. Actually, we used to trade cassette copies of Metallica’s No Life Till Leather years ago too… same with tonnes of other bands at the time that would advertise in the back of magazines offering their cassette demos for the cost of return postage. Only back then, we called it “tape trading” and Lars didn’t seem to mind…

          • Clint

            You know damn well that tape trading was different. Don’t equate how great trading tapes was to illegal downloading.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Will-Morley/618112437 Will Morley

            You’ve been watching Red Dawn too much.

          • Clint

            ……maybe.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Votypka/541093131 Jonathan Votypka

        You have a third man interested as well…

    • jnh363

      I could not agree more that piracy is a threat to music on a general level. However, music itself remains an art form throughout history and only recently assumed a commodity status. Piracy is clearly unfair and demoralizing to the bands, yet commericalism (such as MTV and Disney) provide ongoing fallacies of making tons of money for minnimal talent, whereas the music itself no longer counts towards success. I think Ash brought about a good example of ongoing issues among these lines. Bands should reap the rewards of their work, not only financially but also emotionally by keeping color and free thought throughout the world.

  • http://sebastian.linnet@gmail.com Burger

    Fuck this. That was basically just an ad for the new Born Of Osiris album.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Maclyn-Bean/1078331801 Maclyn Bean

    i thought this would be a Sergeant D post
    :'(

  • somedouche

    good call on this being a BoO ad. its obvious.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cody-Hillyard/1110321462 Cody Hillyard

    That last paragraph hit the nail on the head.

  • darkdragon

    I’m an old fuck so I dont give a shit about Summerian records. Once the kids who are fans of their bands rearch a certain age they’ll probably stop supporting those bands and move on to something else.

  • Ray Peterson212

    I feel like music piracy is only hurting the labels. Lets be honest, Metallica make millions off touring not on how much their record sold. Ash is just pissed because his label is putting up thousands for studio time and then someone steals the album they dont get to recoup that investment. I cant imagine a band like BOO making thousands off of album sales. If they sell 10000 copies of their new album, they will be giving any money they make back to the label anyways. I did like his point of the advertising on the torrent site though. Its funny how people who are offering pirated music and movies are making money on the side.

    • Brian

      You’re absolutely correct about the band not making thousands off of album sales, especially since the money goes back to the label anyways. However, whatever money is not paid back to the label from albums sales has to come from their touring or merch or whatever. So, the album sales are still extremely important to the band. It’s not until you’re around Killswitch Engage (for example) you can make money from the CDs.

      • Matt

        Buy cds at shows, and merch at shows, then the bands will benefit directly from the sales. plus you get to shake their hand and buy their cd and show them you care.

        • http://www.myspace.com/frozenusa Bob Cock

          The bands generally print the t-shirts and buy the CDs from the label then mark them up, so yep — this is the way to get the artists the money you want to spend on their band.

          • matt

            They sometimes have exclusive merch that they only sell at their shows too, which is awesome, I prefer buying merch at shows anyhow.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrew-Sterner/1335958279 Andrew Sterner

    I know it’s not Sumerian’s band, but I pirated the new Amon Amarth Album today, and did so with a smile on my face. I have bought the entire catalog of their work(cds, not dvds), and I’ll probably go out some time after it’s North American release and pick it up.

    My issue with “PIRACY BAD” is this staggered international release. I don’t mind buying music, but what I do mind is having another country get the same fucking music a week before I can get it. I need someone to explain how it helps sales, because I’m at a loss of words. In the age we live in, all the staggered release does is drive people like me to go pirate the shit out of music I’d otherwise pay for. If the product’s done, release it to everyone, not just fucking Sweden.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Mollica/9373117 David Mollica

      Agreed. This is a major failure on the part of labels/distributors.

    • huntermc

      Way back before tha internets, they often did this to coincide with the tours. Like they would release the album a month or two early in Europe to support the European tour, then it would come out in the US and the band would tour over here. But yeah, the whole thing is pointless now that it’s all going to wind up on the internet anyway.

      And the other stupid thing is they way iTunes (and YouTube) block certain artists in certain countries. If someone wants to legally pay for a download form iTunes, or legally watch a Vevo promotional video on YouTube, for fuck’s sake don’t block international customers. The only thing that does it make piracy more appealing.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alan-Miller/710607007 Alan Miller

      To add to that why does japan get all of the fucking bonus tracks?

  • A normal human like the rest of you

    One of the points he seems to be missing is that no one wants to pay for Sumeriancore garbage. I personally think a portion of metal fans have become spoiled to the point where they have ANY album at the click of a mouse, so you really have to make something fantastic for them to actually buy it.

    I personally think CDs need to become obsolete because aside for declining sales, it is a waste of plastic, paper and whatever materials go into making millions of copies that will sit on a shelf or rot in a box. Bands need to go the Bandcamp route and offer their material online either for free or a fixed price, but fans can pay whatever they’d like for it. It’s time to cut the middleman, or the label, out.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joseph-Schafer/40902026 Joseph Schafer

    Here’s my issue with this aside from, as many have said, it being a huge BoO ad:

    The cost of touring has increased, the cost of merchandise and tickets have increased–I still buy tickets, I still buy shirts.

    The cost of recording has decreased, the cost of a CD has remained the same. Likewise, with the rise of youtube/myspace/facebook/bandcamp the truth of the matter is DEMAND FOR PHYSICAL PRODUCT HAS GONE DOWN. I have yet to see anyone be able to parse out precisely how much the gross loss of profit results from people downloading and people simply being uninterested. Do that and it will strengthen the anti-piracy argument 100%.

    Here’s the thing: I use eMusic as much as I can–through that service I get an album for, usually, something like $2.66, no physical artwork, no lyrics, no package–I can make that on my own if i want it. I love that service. Likewise rather than buy a DVD I will pay attention to once, I Netflix the damn thing. If i see a band on bandcamp with 2 good songs and an album for under $9 I BUY IT.

    But you know what, there is no NetMusic, and there’s tons of labels that Will Not sign a contract with eMusic. There’s CD’s priced at $15 sitting on shelves with oil-based plastic packaging that will just shatter and clog up a landfill on a plastic disc equally brittle that will just scratch.

    My iPod has years of life and is made of recyclable parts.

    Do we, as music lovers, need to man up and pay? Fuck yes. I’m guilty too, but you know what? The fucking industry needs to evolve. Did you ever think that if yous old the album for three dollars YOU WOULD SELL FIVE TIMES AS MANY? Because downloading is an impulse, but $15 is an INVESTMENT. For me, that’s gas for two days. That’s me getting to work. That’s my well being. $3? That’s something worth checking out. I am not paying $15 for something that’s going to wear out, pollute the environment and honestly has a 75% chance of disappointing me.

    But if you take out the pollution and make it $3 that’s a fucking deal. Hell, make it $5. Shit, $5 is worth the peace of mind knowing I’m not gonna get sued for something i didn’t even like.

    consider it!

    • kyle u

      your last comments are right now. Hell, look at all the money that is being made in the mobile app market. Angry birds has made MILLIIONS, and it costs 99 cents. I’d like to guarantee you that development costs easily match or eclipse that of recording and marketing an album on Sumerian Records. For reference on development cost of iPhone apps, hear it from the developer of Twitterific http://stackoverflow.com/questions/209170/how-much-does-it-cost-to-develop-an-iphone-application/3926493#3926493

      With everything said, I will always pay for a fantastic physical product. An eagerly anticipated album on vinyl (hate all you want, these glasses are presciption), bundled with a t-shirt or something special. The stuff I download, I don’t really care about that much in the first place. I could definitely live without it, but like someone mentioned before, I’m just spoiled into thinking that I can have any album at the click of a button.

      Interestingly enough, I used to scoff at the concept of music subscriptions as you could not keep physical copies of the song. But with the growing mobile/wireless age, I don’t see myself ever removed from access to these songs, so a cheap subscription service appeals to me now, in the same vein as using Netflix as opposing to amassing a large dvd/blu-ray library.

      • kyle u

        *your last comments are right ON. sorry. not now.

    • cxj

      even though i love physical cds, i’m starting to accept the fact that their time is running out and that my stance on physical product is starting to evolve into something more practical. but thats neither here nor there; i totally support your argument. i’m really starting to enjoy bandcamp and have satisfactorily purchased music from bands there. and it makes me feel good. i paid $6.66 (heh) for the new iron thrones on bandcamp and i’m not too sure i would have paid $15.99 for it at an indie store. and i KNOW the band got more money from it than if said disc existed at aformentioned indie store.

      either way, i think you have a great attitude towards the next logical step in distributing music. i’m with this guy.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joseph-Schafer/40902026 Joseph Schafer

        thank ya thank ya

    • Deth

      I’d have to look at my research again but I believe some early numbers estimated that bands lose up to 50% profit from downloads vs. a physical product. Rolling Stone had an article on it a few years ago.

      Contrary to your statement, the price of recording and manufacturing discs has increased. Technological advances mean the studios have to upgrade; a cost which is passed on to the label and/or the band. However, those costs usually recoup themselves over several years in that fewer items are needed to achieve a good recording sound. Computers, for example, can now do what several sound boards had to do earlier. While it stings at first, studios do end up breaking even as long as their business continues steadily. Instrumental advances increase costs as well (electronics and recording equipment has to be modified to match the new technology). Finally, oil prices have driven up the cost of manufacturing for plastics and for shipping.

      Add downloading to all of these and the consumers haven’t seen a huge leap in price increases for discs; the distributors still want CDs to sell, even with a lower demand. Labels and the music industry are taking a huge hit unless they sell a lot of product. Thus my assertion (above post) that they should embrace downloading and use it as a marketing strategy.

      • fester

        “Contrary to your statement, the price of recording and manufacturing discs has increased.”

        absolutely dead fucking wrong. Ask someone who works as an engineer next time.

        • Clint

          Absolutely dead fucking right. The professional recording industry has taken a dive right along with the music industry. Notice that I said “professional recording industry” and not “home recording equipment manufacturers”. Can a band get a little Pro Tools set up and record themselves? Sure! But if you calculate the number of hours a musician has to spend teaching themselves to record (you, know…..instead of writing songs) it’s way more expensive. Time is money, and your talking about the the cost of home recording equipment + time learning to record + time to write the songs + time actually recording. It adds up. Why do you think so many records sound like shit now? Answer: amateur home recording.

          • fester

            No, Clint, I said I still *charge* the same 25/hr I used to *pay*. 20 YEARS AGO. For capabilities which would have cost 3 times that back in the day.

            now, there’s this thing called inflation. It’s one of the reasons why your rent, gas, and groceries have all increased in price over the last 20 years. What $20 got you in 1991 now costs $32.50, at least according to the consumer price index. So yeah, I would argue that maintaining rates over that time period *does* constitute a decrease. Clear?

            Secondly, cost and value are of course not synonymous, but I’ll leave you to work that out on your own.

            And man, you really unraveled at the end there… Not sure what Chuck Schuldiner has to do with it, but hey, I’m a Death fan too.

            From the tack of your argument, if you want to call it that, it’s pretty clear to me that you don’t have a whole lot of first-hand experience that relates to what you’re trying to talk about. Death rules. Have a nice day.

          • Clint

            My argument is that the cost of recording doesn’t apply to the cost of recording equipment alone. It also applies to the artists ability to produce a piece of more refined art, because of the time artists have to spend away from practicing/writing. Therefore we have less quality artists than we used to, in my opinion. So, you know. Fuck you.

          • fester

            Clint, you’re getting straight incoherent now. How does a superfluity of engineers charging reasonable rates for their services deprive artists of the time to write and practice? It simply doesn’t add up. Again, to be clear, I’m speaking now of the *hourly rates musicians pay to engineers to record in their studios*.

            And hey, ok, fuck me. I must have struck a nerve with that comment about your total lack of personal experience with this matter.

            Reading through the comments on this thread, it’s pretty obvious that no one agrees with you and everyone thinks you’re an asshole. You also seem to have some strong emotional opinions that for whatever reason have outstripped your ability to reason and communicate in an articulate manner. But no, no, you’re right. Fuck me, and nothing will ever be as good as the good old days. I recommend immediate suicide.

        • Deth

          My comment was based on research I did for a masters thesis. Granted, it was two years ago but I doubt the cost for recording has gone down that much in such a short time. Additionally, I’ve been in the studios with many bands recording (I’m friends with Incantation, Acheron, Skeletonwitch, and many others) so I see the costs that are involved. You can’t tell me that the price of recording is the same as it was ten years ago with all of the technolgy that’s involved now. That technology does result in fewer hours spent tweaking the music so costs do level out eventually but the initial investment in updated equipment is something that is passed on to those who use the studio’s services.

          However, if you have information contradicting all of this I’d love to hear it. And I’m not looking to argue, I’m just interested.

          • fester

            ok deth, I’ve been recording for 20 years. First as a musician, then as an engineer. As I interpreted your statement, the issue in question is not whether the cost of recording has decreased in the last 2 years, but the last 10 to 20. Which it certainly has (not that you can’t find somebody who’s willing to suck $60/hr or more out of your pockets, if you want to). New technology, in this case, does not equal greater expense but in fact lesser — smaller machinery that is both more powerful and easier to maintain (not to mention expandable). Think about how expensive VCRs or home video cameras were when they first came out. To have a credible recording setup now, you don’t need a $100,000 Neve board or a $10k Studer tape machine (not that we don’t all still want them).

            This has affected the game for both musicians and engineers. Being that the cost of starting a reasonable studio now is so much less prohibitive than in, say, the late 1980’s, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of recording options for musicians (and at this point, surely we can agree that a flooded marketplace has never led to an *increase* in price). This has changed the way engineers have to compete with one another. There was a time when simply owning a nice reel-to-reel and a good mixing desk entitled you to charge $60/hr (especially if you were the only game in town). No more. While fancy boutique gear and a good-looking space certainly help to attract clients, there is simply too much competition for that stuff to be enough. The more important questions now are “how good does your work sound?” and “how cost-effectively can you do that work?” (… not to mention “are you a tolerable human being to deal with?”) Some of the best engineers in my town now charge 20-30/hr for top-quality work.

            Now, none of this is to downplay your experiences (snark of my earlier post notwithstanding). But I feel as if your analysis is incomplete. It’s not just about what studio time costs, but what your end product is. Sure, the engineer you like to work with may renovate his studio and increase his rates by 5 dollars an hour. But you’re still coming out ahead. With modern computer-based recording, we now have the capability to produce results that previously were simply impossible outside of the prohibitively expensive corporate studio system. Here’s an example. Let’s say a band wants to get really ambitious in the studio. They want to add some acoustic guitar, some strings, some samples, some percussion, a fucking gospel choir, whatever. Shit-tons of tracks. In the days of tape, approaching a project like this meant finding a studio with not one, but 2 or 3 tape machines that could be synced — or, worse yet, renting additional machines and bringing them to the studio. At this point you’re paying rental, studio fees, and potentially your engineer’s rate if he’s not the owner-operator. But in our digital age, it’s simply a matter of clicking your mouse and creating more tracks. This means that even independent bands with pretty modest recording budgets can now make elaborate albums that in the 70’s or 80’s would have cost literally tens of thousands of dollars. Hell, 20 years ago, when my first band made our first demo, we paid 25/hr to record to a 16-track tape machine. Now I charge that same 25/hr for the use of a system that is infinitely more flexible and powerful, with a track count that is for all practical purposes unlimited. I don’t even know how to calculate the savings bands accrue by being able to do seamless digital punches rather than dozens of takes.

            And Clint, if you think Pro Tools = amateur, you’re laboring under a misconception.

          • Clint

            I’m under no misconceptions at all. I never said Pro Tools = amateur. I said Pro Tools + amateur = shit. A decent recording platform does not always equal a high quality recording if the person using it doesn’t know what their doing.
            Yeah, the machines you use to record are cheaper. But you still have to know how to use them. Artists now have to make compromises with their time. Did Chuck Schuldiner have to spend weeks or months or years learning to engineer AND record? No, Chuck spent his time learning to play guitar and writing songs. And he was a FUCKING BADASS. There is no equal today for that exact reason.
            You say you still pay $25/hr just like you used to? How is that cheaper for you?

        • Clint

          And I recommend you blow it out your ass. You sure are full of a lot of shit for someone who has “been recording for 20 years”.
          Most bands are having to engineer the bulk of the records they’re recording at home (or wherever). You know as well as I do (or do you?) most recording/ engineering done now is not done by a professional engineer in a professional recording studio. It’s done by the artists themselves, which takes time away from the artistic process. Which is not ideal. That’s my first hand experience. And yes, it can completely stifle the artistic process. “Clear”?
          “It’s not just about what studio time costs, but what your end product is”. How’s that for articulate? It’s a quote from a certain special cocksucker who thinks he knows everything.
          I do notice your not providing any real information contradicting “Deth”s statements. That pretty much says everything that needs to be said, as far as I’m concerned.
          Do I care if people think I’m an asshole? Not really. And you hit a nerve, alright. It’s my “I’m talking to a know nothing condescending prick” nerve. Was that too incoherent to analyze, Dr. Clownshoes?

          Like I said, fuck you.

          • fester

            haha, Dr. Clownshoes! Man, are you angry!

            Say “fuck you” again! Then we can all take a drink!

          • Matt

            First rounds on me!

          • Clint

            So….I guess your done with your argument? Makes sense. There wasn’t much of one there anyway. Go console yourself with a drink, loser. That’s fine by me.

          • Matt

            Haha Clint you’re too funny.

            Also your grammar sucks. How can one act so smart when, they like, use way too many commas, and like don’t know how use “your” and “you’re”? Take a look at some of your comments because you’re kinda sucking in that department. When you learn how to make an educated statement we’ll take your arguments serious. Have a good day Clint, and don’t forget to smile =)

          • Clint

            What’s actually funny is you commenting on any ones “grammar”. I rattle these things off In two or three minuets tops. I can’t spend fifteen minuets poking at my iPhone with two thumbs, like you (or, God….your keyboard at home). I guess you’ve got all the time in the world to spot and correct mistakes. I’ve got other things to do. Plus I don’t care because it the INTERNET. So, yeah. Still smarter than you. Get over it.

          • Matt

            Droid x motherfucker! Iphones are for noobbbbbsssssss and hipsters

          • Clint

            I just thought about it, and realized that I wrote minuets instead of minutes. Minuets is an actual word so my spell check didn’t register it as being misspelled. Do’h! Man, my “grammar” DOES SUCK!

          • Clint

            “Droid x motherfucker! Iphones are for noobbbbbsssssss and hipsters”- That’s fair.
            The x should be capitalized, the “i” should be lower case and the “p” uppercase in iPhone, and there should be an exclamation point after hipsters.

          • Matt

            Why would I need an exclamation point when I’m making a statement?

          • Clint

            I give up.

          • Matt

            I told you that you wouldn’t make the cut. Gotta be way more persistent on this site!

          • Clint

            Then……..I’M BACK IN!!!!!!

  • chainchomp

    excellent post vince. you were spot on with calling out all the valid and invalid things that were said in the video especially with it coinciding with the release of boo’s new album. however, this topic is kinda like a debate of religion in that it is so massive you would never be able to hit all of you points home in a 3 minute video. so with that being said i believe that ash did the best that could be done with the amount of time that he put into it or wanted to put into it.

  • Driven9

    wow.. that vid is the definition of a Self Serving PSA.

  • Kuranes

    As Vince suggested, this argument of recoupment is getting a little tenuous. A lot of unsigned bands have multiple, professionally recorded albums with artwork and all, and if they get picked up by a label the only costs are manufacturing and distribution, which can’t be very high these days given that most people are buying digitally. One of my most anticipated albums of 2011 is the debut record by Huntress, who are in the final stages of mixing and as far as I know will be releasing it in May themselves.

    • Clint

      So…..I’m guessing your in Huntress, huh? Or *snickersnickergigglegiggle* is it more like Cuntress? HAAA HAA AAAA !!!

      Spread the word.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Michael-Hurley/720394423 John-Michael Hurley

    He does make some good points, but I think they’re overshadowed by how much emphasis he puts on the importance of record labels. Good music doesn’t need the music industry, the music industry needs good music. He would have been more convincing if he had a song like the SIIA’s Don’t Copy That Floppy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up863eQKGUI

  • kyle u

    robs 12 billion dollars and 71,000 jobs. That makes an AVERAGE of $170,000 per job that is robs. that’s how much these jobs are worth?

    • Clint

      Yeah, dumbass. That’s how much they’re worth. Good math. What the fuck do you think the word average means? Some people make more money than others, some people make less. Ever hear of a place called America? That’s the way it works here.

      • kyle u

        Geez, Ted Nugent, I’ll get off your lawn.

        • matt

          I SERIOUSLY dout that the owner of sumerian records, or any metal record company makes more than 100,000 a year. But i think he is talking about the music buisness as a whole. so yea i bet most of the money being robbed is off of kid cudi and lil wayne, and im perfectly fine with that.

          • Clint

            You guys do realize that’s 12 billion dollars ELIMINATED from the economy, right? As in *poof* disappeared?

          • Jack

            No, it wasn’t “eliminated,” it was re-allocated. As in *shit-doesn’t-just-disappear* The pirates STILL spend their money, they just buy something else.

            Unless you know a way so buy shit aside from the economy, I call bullshit.

            WAIT A MINUTE. Lars? Is that you? Come clean man.

          • Clint

            You’ve got to be fucking kidding.

  • Budda Bubba

    This is just a dude crying cause his way of life is on the way out. He doesn’t provide any services that are necessary to the survival of art or music. He caters to wants and lets lazy kids like me live out their rockstar dreams. Seriously the fucking anti piracy argument is retarding artistic progress. I really hope I’m alive to see the day the music and movie industries fucking crumble and art is returned to real honest people. I’m not a criminal for downloading music. I’m under the impression it’s being made for others to listen to not simply a means to a end to put money in your pocket. If that’s why you make music then be honest and fucking say it. You’re not an artist you’re a salesman.

    To be honest I got plenty of fucking CD’s, DVD’s, T-shirts, Posters (A higher place hanging behind me from when I pre-orderd that) and I’ve been to lots of shows (Including BoO) to support bands when I was a teenager and in high school with disposable income. Now I need to keep the roof over my own head and food on my table weed in my bowls. Spending $40 to $100 every couple weeks to appease my musical appetite isn’t really realistic. If that makes a criminal then come and get me.

    • Clint

      Post your real name and address, pussy. If your not scared, that is.

      • Matt

        I’ll give you my address!

    • Matt

      Tell you what, I’ll make you a deal:

      I’ll show you mine if you show me yours. You first.

      • Clint

        You ARE scared, huh? I’ll make you a deal: I’ll fuck your mom while you watch.

        • Matt

          Technically you could fuck my “mom” but in reality you would be fucking a dude because I have two dads…..Glad to see you swing both ways!

          • Clint

            You have two Dads? That would that qualify YOU as an expert on cocks, not me.

          • Matt

            I’m the cock commando!

            Yo dawg you might wanna think of something new, these insults hit about as hard as that new limp bizkit cd.

            FEAR THE COBRA!!!!!!!!!!!

          • Clint

            Then why do you keep responding?

      • Matt

        Because I know deep down, it bugs you. Very much. Obviously you keep responding too.

        Here, listen to this and find your Zen my friend:
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEVELikwBQ0

        • Clint

          Now your an expert on “deep down”, too? Everything just fell in place. It all makes perfect sense now. Thank you, Zen master.

          • Matt

            You are welcome my child

    • nick

      This is really the crux of the matter. Record labels don’t realize there is simply more competition in the ENTIRE marketplace for our money. Video games, movies, services like cable, internet, cell phones, health care, shit adds up! People aren’t saving enough and are living check to check and labels complain that every single one of their ever increasing releases isn’t pushing numbers. It’s absurd. A working man would go broke buying every release that comes out each week.

      And can we be blamed if we aren’t interested at all? What these asshats in the industry don’t understand is that while some people might pirate their shit, others may be completely uninterested! So why take the risk? Why cough up that $15 that could otherwise go towards the phone bill this month on a band that’s been going downhill the last couple of releases? Every unauthorized download DOES NOT EQUAL a lost sale. What the labels are arguing for is a return to the days when they had the upper hand and the consumer was ignorant and vulnerable. People who were true music lovers would take risks back then on unknown acts in an attempt to find worthwhile material, many times getting burned! Now that the consumer has more power they can spend their money more wisely.

  • http://fullmetalattorney.blogspot.com/ Full Metal Attorney

    A lot of great comments here. My favorite part of your article:

    “The period lasting roughly from 1930 through 2000 was the apex of a bell curve in the history of music due to the happy collision of humankind’s technological ability to reproduce audio recordings and our inability to do so efficiently; now that we can do so more efficiently, things go back to normal.”

    That’s an interesting observation. And yes, the industry does need to evolve.

    • Clint

      Yeah, too bad the observation is total fucking bullshit. There was no inefficiency in reproducing audio recordings. It just wasn’t OK for people to steal every CD they could lay their hands on. 33 million people wanted a copy of “Jagged Little Pill”. You know what happened? 33 million people got a copy. No inefficiencies to be found.

      • SourDeez

        CDs require pressing at a plant, shipping to a store, rack space, and people to actually go to the store and buy them. Digital downloads, which only take up hypothetical space, require one single upload so that an infinite amount of people can have the exact same music in under 5 minutes. In comparison, I would certainly call CDs inefficient.

        • Clint

          No. Read what he said: “The period lasting roughly from 1930 through 2000 was the apex of a bell curve in the history of music due to the happy collision of humankind’s technological ability to reproduce audio recordings and our inability to do so efficiently; now that we can do so more efficiently, things go back to normal.” He was actually saying there were more people who wanted a copy than a copy could be provided for. Which is not true. The only stipulation was that the person had to pay for the copy before it was provided. I have no idea what the fuck he means by “things go back to normal”. I guess I just have to chalk that up to the fact that he’s a fucking idiot.

  • Grimly Fiendish

    Ash does make valid points – for the most part. As someone that lost his job to downloading (I spent 20 years in the music business, with 15 at UMG) I’ve seen this from both the consumer and label points of view. Illegal downloading will never go away. Free will always win over guilt. Every time a DRM gets put in place, some 15 year-old will beat it in a matter of hours. Same goes for file sharing.

    The major labels are squarely to blame for the situation. Continually force feeding cookie-cutter bands with limited talent and one good song to the public led to the current state. With the only option being to pay $18 for a CD, people will always look for an alternative. Rather than embrace Napster and its bastard offspring, the majors sued rather than learn to harness that power. Additionally, the majors weren’t above doing the same thing themselves. In January, the majors had to pay Canadian artists $45 million for including unlicensed songs on compilations. This dated back to the early 1980s. Reeks of piracy, doesn’t it? Add to this that the majors keep employing the same people that created this fiasco, and things won’t change anytime soon. Sony just hired Doug Morris to take over after a decade plus at Universal. It wasn’t until 2005 or so that he even knew what an mp3 was. Sony expects him to lead them into the future?

    Unfortunately, what the majors created, the indie label sector has to live with. They have to be creative and find other sources of revenue. Merchandising is one such area. Far too often, however, bands don’t get it right. A couple of weeks ago I went to see Deicide. They had two shirts – and one was from the Legion tour. The only sizes they had were XL and small, and even those were gone before Neuraxis was even done. Blackguard however, who was third on the bill, had about 10 shirts in every size. While not my cup of tea, I give them props for getting it right. A cool design for $15 will almost always get me to buy. $20 for garbage that looks like a 3 year-old designed it will not.

    Technology has provided inexpensive and professional recorded equipment that gives bands better opportunities. Additionally, kids get better instruction because of the internet. Look at http://www.playthisriff.com. Lessons on how to play cool songs for $10 a month helps kids learn to play almost anything. More talented musicians will rise to the top, which will create new and exciting music.

    Interactivity is the key, and those that find new and exciting ways to connect to their audience will prosper. Those that stick with the old guard will slowly fade away.

  • James

    Lets find out how much Born of Osiris gets PER album sale(probably $1) and just mail it to the band directly.

    So their label gets nothing because they’re scum and BOO gets money because they’re artist and they don’t work for free.

    Problem solved.

  • http://www.heavyblogisheavy.com Alkahest

    He talks like he fronted the money for every band to record their album. Periphery had their shit done before Sumerian got to them and Michael Keene has his own studio and does all their production work.

    That said, it’s a no brainer; if you download music without, that’s less money that eventually winds up in the hands of the bands. But then again, free music = more ears hearing the music, which leads to ticket and merch sales. It’s a catch 22.

    The bottom line though, is that nothing’s going to change and labels and bands have no choice but adjust accordingly.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lewis-Hart/562135455 Lewis Hart

    Another thing Ash gets wrong: differentiating between the paying customer and the pirate. They’re the same people! http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/apr/21/study-finds-pirates-buy-more-music

  • Geetarz

    I wont sit here and discredit what Sumerian Records does for its bands. So lets be honest here………. Their bands suck.

    And here is a list of people who actually care and buy their albums……………

  • Matt

    You nailed it Axl!

    • Matt

      *Vince

      haha

      • Vince Neilstein

        yeah get it right dickhead dont piss me off ill kick you off this site

        • Matt Gaipa

          It was the heat of the moment

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tanner-Westhomas/1506171449 Tanner Westhomas

    I own around 1,000 CDs, I buy what I like. For me, money is too tight these days to take a chance on $10-$20, that’s why I usually DL the album to see if i want it first. Bands that I know will put out quality albums ie – TBDM, Behemoth, Gojira, Baroness, Decrepit Birth, High On Fire, Krallice, Nile, Revocation, Skeletonwitch… I buy before previewing, because they make a product I want to own. 99% of my wardrobe is band tees, almost all of which I bought directly from the band at shows. I believe people should buy albums that they love, if they don’t care enough to own a physical copy of the CD then they aren’t that big of a fan. Simple as that. Many people don’t realize a digital copy (bought or pirated) isn’t really yours, your just paying for the rights to use it personally. So when shit goes down, and society is reduced to an irradiated crater, if my house survives… I’ll be laughing it off with my CDs, vinyl, record player, generator, and headphones. Until I die.

    Oh, and born of osiris sucks (The Faceless on the other hand…)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jason-Lekberg/779008102 Jason Lekberg

    Why does it have to be here to stay? Piracy is stealing. Saying things like that only facilitate those who are feeling guilty about the wrong they are doing.

    What you got right: posting this video

    What you got wrong: that last argument.

    • msv81

      You’re either: A) completely delusional & out of touch with reality; B) a total moron.

      …or I suppose it could be a combination of the two.

      Downloading music is here to stay because technology doesn’t revert, it evolves. It’s entirely possible, and in fact widespread/commonplace, to be able to download a band’s entire discography in less than 5 minutes even if their career spans over 30 years and 40+ releases.

      As computers become increasingly more efficient while simultaneously dropping in price and internet providers continue to develop even faster connections, downloading speeds will reach a point where getting an album is essentially instantaneous.

      Moreover, CDs will one day become obsolete. We are already close to witnessing an entire generation of kids who acquire their music solely by digital means; whether they pay for it or not is a matter or personal preference. As Vince made clear: “The belief that CDs, or even legal digital file ownership, are going to make a magical comeback is akin to thinking the horse and buggy will soon become the preferred mode of transportation in America.”

      • Clint

        “CDs will one day become obsolete”? “Become”? Who’s the moron again? Vinyl may be obsolete too, but it’s not gone is it? It made the “magical comeback”. And I don’t know what “internet providers” your talking about developing these “faster connections”, but hook me up! ……WITH YOUR DEALER!!!

        • msv81

          Are you kidding? LORD FORGIVE ME for saying internet providers as opposed to ISP, like it’s that big of a fucking difference you twat.

          And are you really too much of a moron to realize what I was referring to? First came dial-up, then DSL, then T1 networks, then cable internet, and now there’s FIOS (and I don’t give a shit if I’m missing any in the timeline, you should get my drift regardless). I think it’s safe to assume in the next 5-10 years we’ll be seeing even more technological developments in the realm of connection speeds.

          • Clint

            You sure like the word “moron”, huh? I don’t know ANYONE with a T1, cable, etc. connection. The only real affordable “advancement” in the last ten years has been from dial-up to DSL. For almost everyone. It’s not a real advancement if no one has access to it.

          • Matt

            I have cable…….WELCOME TO THE FUTURE!

          • Clint

            Good for you, FAAAAAAGGGGG!

          • Matt

            I KNOW HAVING CABLE INTERNET MAKES ME A TOTAL HOMO!

          • Clint

            Hey, at least you admit to it. Good on ya!

          • Matt

            OMG I AM SO BURNNNEEEEDDD! HOMO JOKES MAKE YOU LOOK SO DAMN HIP AND COOL AND TRENDY! I BET YOU ALWAYS WERE THE COOL KID BACK IN HIGH SCHOOL AND TOTALLY HAVE THE BIGGEST DICK! GIVE ME YOUR BODY NOW!

            HOW!
            DO!
            YOU!
            FUCKING!
            DO!
            IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          • Clint

            With your mother while you watch, hopefully.

          • Matt

            You used that one already, -1 troll toll!!!!!!!!!!!

          • Clint

            Yeah, I know…….that’s what I was referring to. Your a bit slow, aren’t you.

          • Matt

            Haha you need to go back to troll college if you wanna survive on metalsucks. Right now I don’t think you’ve got what it takes kid!

          • Clint

            “Troll college”?!? It’s over folks! I WIN!

            I WIN! I WIN! I WIN! I WIN! I WIN! I WIN! I WIN! I WIN! I WIN! I WIN!

          • Matt
          • Clint

            Yay! I “WIN!” I “WIN”! I “WIN”! I “WIN”! I “WIN”! I “WIN”! I “WIN”!

          • msv81

            “You sure like the word “moron”, huh? I don’t know ANYONE with a T1, cable, etc. connection. The only real affordable “advancement” in the last ten years has been from dial-up to DSL. For almost everyone. It’s not a real advancement if no one has access to it.”

            HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA OH MY GOD! You are from some hick state in the middle of nowhere, aren’t you? You don’t know ANYONE with cable, T1, or FIOS? How about EVERYONE I know has cable internet or FIOS. And how about the entire city of Philadelphia has free wireless internet that’s run by Comcast. Guess what Comcast has? CABLE INTERNET!!

            Comcast also has a monopoly on internet access in the entire state of Pennsylvania, so that would account for MILLIONS of people having cable internet. I have friends spread out all over the country, in places unlike whatever horrible place you’re from, and every single one of them has cable internet; Arizona, Nevada, California, Washington State, Washington D.C., Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Boston, Tampa Bay, Raleigh, Richmond, Dallas.

            So go ahead and be wrong about more shit.

          • Clint

            HAAA HAA AAA!! Cleaning out those panties kept you up late, huh?
            The percentage of American households that connect to the Internet using broadband were about 63% in 2009. And that’s mostly using DSL, not a T1, cable, etc. connection. That leaves 37% of the population using dial up or not connecting to the internet at all from the home. So…..how am I wrong again, “moron”?
            Keep squirting those undergarments!

          • Matt

            “On February 23, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released the results of a consumer survey, “Broadband Adoption & Use in America,” that found affordability and lack of digital skills are the main reasons why 93 million — or one third of the country — are not connected to high speed Internet at home.”

            “The FCC survey found that 39 percent of all Americans without broadband have some type of disability.”

            See Clint notice how it says “Lack of Digital skills” and not just “affordability” You can’t just half ass the story to make yourself look better because only Fox News can get away with that. When looking at these numbers take in consideration of the elderly and mentally disabled because they make up a good part of our population.

          • Matt

            “affordability.”

            Excuse my poor grammar

          • Clint

            Yeah, excuse you. You do realize you’re not contradicting anything I said, right? I see the word “broadband” which applies mostly to DSL. I don’t see any mention of a T1, cable, etc. connection at all. Go work on that and get back to me.

          • Matt

            “The only real affordable “advancement” in the last ten years has been from dial-up to DSL. For almost everyone. It’s not a real advancement if no one has access to it.”

            http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10454133-94.html

            According to that the “cost” association is only about roughly a 1/3rd of the reason why people don’t have broadband. And honestly taking a look at the price difference between DSL and other alternatives is pretty reasonable these days:
            http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/83886

            Where are you getting your statistics that show most people are mainly using dsl? I’m honestly asking for some credible sources. Just barking off numbers doesn’t really prove anything either my little Clinty-poo

          • Clint

            Pew Research Center. Look it up. Read What I wrote, idiot. Cost or availability in COMBINATION with each other limit access to just “regular” broadband. There are a lot of people who can’t get broadband at all. There are also a lot of people who can only get dial-up/DSL. And there are a lot of people who can’t afford either. LIKE I SAID, most people in this country don’t have access to anything better than DSL.
            Go do the homework yourself. All the information you needs out there. I’m going to dinner.

          • Matt

            If you go by this study I could see where you would gather your dsl opinion:
            http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Rural_Broadband.pdf.pdf

            But that was data from 2005. If you look at this study you pretty much have a split between DSL, Cable, and “wireless”
            http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/Home%20broadband%202010.pdf

            Even with your point of the “combination” of high speed being to expensive (10%) and not available (6%) a big chunk of why people don’t have high speed is because the opinion is “I’m just not interested” (31%). Thank you for the data.

          • Clint

            Whateeever.

  • Agony

    One of the most important assumptions that the anti-piracy argument makes is that a download = a lost sale. This is simply not true. And like Lewis pointed out above, there is actually evidence that piracy can INCREASE sales. Here’s author Neil Gaiman talking about how piracy has affected his own book sales:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Qkyt1wXNlI

    I came close to getting a record deal a few years ago, and the label essentially wanted our demo to be the near-final recording, which we had recorded ourselves on a desktop. There was no talk of studios, producers or promotion. I’ve had other friends that have signed with labels, and they have all been shitty deals. And you know what else? A lot of those functions he was talking about in the video are often the responsibility of either the band themselves, or their manager (if they have one). I’m glad to see that most of you are not buying this BS.

  • halloway

    If the physical copy is worth buying, it’s worth buying, ’nuff said.

    When The Ocean or Tool puts an album out, I know I’m going to buy it regardless if I heard it and liked it because there’s actual value in the physical media. New Obscura art is cool in the physical package, and that’s nothing fancy, just glossed portions of typical metal artwork/packaging.

    Which is why I’m pretty disappointed in my physical copy of Digital Veil – I coulda saved $3 by buying it off of iTunes and got the same thing – music with an album cover. The rest of the packaging is boring lyrics on boring black. There wasn’t even anything behind/on the CD. YAWN. I could’ve saved myself $13 if I would have just downloaded it somewhere and bought something physical that is actually worth having.

    And I consider myself one of those ancient “CD/record buying folk.”

    Labels gotta step the game up and make these albums worth buying, stop selling people what they can obtain for free (with virtually no penalty).

    • SourDeez

      Exactly, bands like Tool and Mastodon have had excellent support from smart labels, and were able to release a physical product actually worth owning. Mastodon releases making-of DVDs that are actually very well made and unavailable elsewhere, and Tool had that cool 3D art thing with their last album. Nowadays, when I buy a physical copy of something, it’s always vinyl, because the sleeve is a huge copy of the album art and I actually enjoy the physical acts of dropping the needle and flipping the record. When I buy a CD, it just winds up in my iTunes library and on my iPod, just like it would if I had downloaded it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Shanks/1273561133 Tim Shanks

    What Vince got wrong:
    He didn’t release this video on the day the album came out; I watched this last week. Not a big deal though.

  • kmfcm

    Sign some good bands.
    Put out some good records.
    Then we’ll talk.

    About the only thing they have released worth paying for was “villains”.

    • fatpuppy

      this is a great surprise to see, but very true great album.

  • bradyja

    Great post- finally not a your band sucks, no your band sucks comment stream.

    The issue for me is: where do the artists stand? I don’t care 2 shits about the labels, distributors etc. I pay for everything I down load because I want the artist to get paid. Whether they actually see a sufficient cut of that price, I’m not so sure and that’s a whole other issue.. I don’t buy CDs anymore b/c frankly I no longer have the space (my 5 yr old takes up that space now)..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Brent-Andersen/1394252992 Brent Andersen

    As someone who live is in Canada, I can tell you we get the shaft HARD when it comes to digital music. We have next to nothing in terms of downloading, our only option seems to be iTunes, and that’s not going to happen. It doesn’t make sense what-so-ever to sell the CD but not the MP3. You want everyone to BUY your music, try SELLING everyone your music.

  • Lucifersmile

    I’m all about piracy. When napster came out, I found someone posted a few of our 7″s and I was pissed. They were all still in print, why not order from us? Then I thought about it. I’ve played in bands for 19 years and never made more than 600 bucks on a tour. I didn’t pick up a bass to make money. I am stoked anyone would spend any time uploading my shit. I feel honored by someone pirating me. “I can honestly say I don’t give a fuck about your money, because it means so much to you” – embrace

  • Lucifersmile

    Jet go to a show and buy some merch.

  • cocksucker

    This is a stupid topic. If you want to buy it, go ahead, if you don’t, fine by me. I mean, I don’t ask money for scripts/coding stuff I did, and I’m still a student with little to no cash on daily basis.

    If this “piracy” is killing the so called industry, how come it still fucking exists? Don’t you think mp3 would’ve killed the physical copies after those 17 years? Don’t you think there wouldn’t be any new rich artists that come out of nowhere? So really, this entire video is just a cry for money. If I was the artist, I wouldn’t give a fuck how you get my music. The fact that people would listen to it and are actually excited to hear it, is more than a kind gesture. Imho.

  • Lucifersmile

    As I recall, Green Day didn’t make a dime off Dookie til their 3rd major label record came out. Artist don’t make money from Cd’s. What do they make at most? .90 per unit? It’s all about merch and gigs. Always has been for a working class band.

  • Lucifersmile

    CDs cost .09 cents to make, the distro marks the price between say $10 and $18. The band isn’t gonna make a dime off that until you move over a million units if you’re lucky. Labels big and small fuck over bands everyday in this respect. Most bands pay for all their recording and touring anyway. It’s a misconception that the label pays for anything. They may pay upfront, but you owe them.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Corey-Mitchell/660352330 Corey Mitchell

      Thank you. You’re the first person here to break down exactly how labels have screwed bands over for decades. Now the labels are crying because they aren’t able to squeeze out every last cent from their artists and the consumers who’ve the’ve fucked for decades.

      • http://twitter.com/stuffuyouwillhate Sergeant D

        I used to work for a large CD/DVD manufacturer and just FYI, that number is wrong for the quantities most smallish labels are doing. Maybe you could get 9 cents for just a CD with a 1-color print on it, but NFW you are getting booklets, jewel cases, shrink wrap, shipping, etc for 9 cents unless you are doing like 10s of millions (and even then…).

        Especially when you factor in marketing and so forth, amoritized across say 50K units the cost per CD is probably like $2-$5.

        Your point stands but it’s not quite as a ridiculous as you paint it to be.

        • Guest

          In Australia CDs retail for AT LEAST $30 new. And with the US dollar where it is today, that equates to $30.79. How is this value for money?

  • SourDeez

    He really neglected to point out that artists nowadays are almost always signed to 360 deals, meaning a piece of ANY REVENUE MADE goes to the label. Just about none of this revenue, for the label or the band, comes from sales of physical CDs. He’s also acting like labels have the same amount of CDs printed and shipped that they did in 1990. Obviously, the demand for physical product has gone down, so the supply is much, much cheaper for the label to create. Instead, you have more fans of more bands, because let’s face it, your average music fan can’t afford to go out and buy 50 CDs in a day, but they can certainly download 50 cds and therefore be exposed to 50 new artists. IN ONE DAY! The sooner labels accept this as a shift in how things are done rather than a battle to be fought, the better off they’ll be.

  • Lucifersmile

    I’ve tallied up roughly what I’ve spent on just CDs and vinyl in the last 20 years and it comes to around $35,000. None of that has helped a single fucking band unless I bought in when the band was on tour.

  • http://twitter.com/stuffuyouwillhate Sergeant D

    Not trying to read all these (most likely retarded) comments but solid analysis, Vince! Nice work and agree 100%.

    • Clint

      Hey, you know what? Fuck Vince. “Music was never supposed to get anyone rich”? Who the fuck decided that? Food was never supposed to get any one rich either. Yet we have McDonalds. You know what the difference is? Most people don’t think it’s OK to steal as many hamburgers as they want.

      • http://twitter.com/stuffuyouwillhate Sergeant D

        lol u so mad

        • Clint

          Like your Mom was mad when I didn’t pull out in time?

          • Clint

            Sorry about your Dora the Explorer sheets, by the way.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jamel-Banner/731572742 Jamel Banner

        You can’t download a big mac……cause on everything I love….if I could go to BitTorrent and download a Quarter Pounder with Fries and a soda I’d never leave my house

        • Clint

          You just proved my point. Your a piece of shit. Given the opportunity to contribute absolutely nothing, you’d contribute nothing. Which is what’s happened to music. Everyone wants to eat (and does eat), but no one wants to pony up for dinner.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jamel-Banner/731572742 Jamel Banner

            No…it’s business…..i don’t care how pretty your painting is or how awesome your album is…..if there is a way to not pay for it…it’ll happen. Boo fucking hoo….you wanna get a job that pays you for your work…be a fucking doctor.

            PS: Why would you pony up for dinner if it’s free ??? Cause you like the cook ???

          • Clint

            That’s the thing, shit for brains. Dinner’s not free. No one ever said it was. And it’s doesn’t become free because you stole it. That’s why it’s called stealing. Just because you “got away” with it doesn’t mean you didn’t steal it. And your a piece of shit because you think it’s OK. It’s not. If you weren’t a piece of shit you might know the difference between right and wrong.

          • msv81

            Comparing music to food is ridiculous, just like you are for commenting on 50% of the posts here in a hissy fit/bitchfest. I’m sorry, who made you the piracy police? And who the fuck are you, Mr. Guy on the Internet, to tell anybody what’s right or wrong?

            Seriously, that large stick is so far up your ass I can see it coming out of your mouth. Reality check: NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR OPINION!

            FYI – last time I checked, without sustenance (i.e. FOOD) no form of life would exist. Without music, the world would be a much less colorful and interesting place but it would nevertheless still be here.

            I’m gonna go download some more music now and feel completely guilt free about it. Thanks goodbye.

          • Clint

            Uh oh. Looks like some one cares about my opinion! You might need to change your panties after that one! I can smell the love!

          • Matt

            HAVE MY BABIES CLINT! YOU SO FUCKING SMART AND KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT MUSIC! WE ALL BE DUMB HILLBILLY INFERIOR FOLK COMPARED TO YOU!@*()#&(*&!@#*($

          • Clint

            That sounds about right.

  • Rzazz

    That guy can fuck himself.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jamel-Banner/731572742 Jamel Banner

    If kids aren’t buying music then why do bands/label still try to sell it to them ??? Pump out the songs/albums and give em away for free that way you eliminate the whole piracy bullshit and leaking of your product because everything goes through you….what the fans hear/when they hear it. Since the fans don’t have to worry about purchasing the cd they can worry about purchasing tickets to your concert or a t shirt or DVD’s and what have you…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josh-Williamson/516066752 Josh Williamson

    i only buy vinyl as i think digital/downloads has made cds a redundant format vinyl still has that timeless collectible feel also theres more scope for limited/unusual releases , i generally also only buy the music of my very favourite bands or local or uk bands as i want to support the scene one which is very diy and i think is worth supoprting , i couldnt care less about sumerian records and their profits bands should do it diy anyway instead of taking the easy route

  • Lucifersmile

    Sgt. D, I get your point. The Cd’s might actually cost a dollar to produce with artwork. My last run of 1,000 CDs cost $900. That’s with 4 over printing and cd printed in color. It’s even cheaper if you make more. My recording costs went from $200 a day in an analog studio 10 years ago to FREE now on pro tools at a friend’s home studio. I just pay for mastering and CDs now. Needless to say, it’s way cheaper now for a working class band to record. And I’ll never make a dime off those CDs.

  • WEAD SMOAKER

    I found that cockroach, Ash Avildsen on facebook and sent him this message:

    “You should make an anti-piracy video with cartoons since the only age group relevant to Sumerian Records is 12-15 year olds who don’t yet realize that the only place this shit is considered “metal” is at Hot Topic. May hundreds of thousands of copies of the new Hate Eternal album fall from te sky and bury you! ”

    I understand his points, but that looked as much like a marketing ploy for Born of Osiris as it did a public service announcement.

    • WEAD SMOAKER

      to which he replied in a very well spoken manner, and made me retract my statement….. up mine

      • WEAD SMOAKER

        and up mine and up mine and up mine
        you know i’m really starting to enjoy this

        • ash avildsen

          dude, that’s so gross.

          • WEAD SMOAKER

            i know
            i just keep thinking about black guys
            i cant stop

        • XanderDanger

          Want some help? I rock in the backdoor department. If you catch my drift.

          • XanderDanger

            _________§§§$$§§$§§_
            _________$$$$$§§§$$§§$§_
            _______($$$$$$$§§§$$§§$§§_(§§)_
            _______($$$$$$$$$$$$§§$$__$§§$)~
            ________(§§§$$$$§$$$$§§$$§§$§§$§§~
            ________((_($$§§$§§$§§§§§§§§§$$§§$
            ________))_(§$$$$$$§§$$§§$§§$§§§§§~
            _________((_)_((§$$§$$§§$$§§$§§$§§§§((….
            ___________))_)_§$$))_$$$§§§$$§§$§§$§§§§§
            ___________(__(_))_§$§§§§§$$§§$$§§$§§$§§§
            _______________(__$_$$§§§§§§$$§§$$§§$§§$§§
            _______________)_$_$§$§§§§§§$§§$$§§$§§§§__§
            __________________)$__§§§§§§$§$$_§$$§§___§$§
            _________________(§___$§§§§§$§§$_§$$___§§§§§§
            _________________($§__$§$§§§$$$§§§_$__$§§§§§$§§
            __________________§§§_§$$$$$§§§§§§§$§§_§$$§$$§§
            ___________________(§__§§§§§§§§§§$§§$$§§_§§$_§§
            ___________________(§_$$§§$§§§§§§§§$$§§$§_$§§§§
            ____________________§_$§§$§§§§§§§§$$§§_§§$§§§§§
            ____________________§__$$§§§§$§§§§§§$_§§$§§$§§§
            _____________________§_$$§§§§$§§§§§__$§§$§§$§§
            _____________________§_$$_§§§§§§$§§$$§§$§§§§
            _____________________§§§§_§§§§§$§§$$§§$§§§§
            _____________________§§§$$::::§§$$$§§$$§§$_§
            ___________________§§§§:§§§§§§__§§$§§$§_§§
            ______.O$$$$$$$$$§$$:§§§§§$$$§___§$§§$§§§§
            ____ @$$$$$$$$$$§§:§§$§$$§§$$__$§§$§§§§§§
            ____________$$§:§§§$§$$$$$§§$$§§$§§$§_§§§
            __________$$§:§§$$$$$$§§$§§§§§§§$$___$§§
            _______$$$§::§$$$$$$§§$§§§§§§§§§______§§
            _____$$$§::§$$$$§§$§§§§§§§$§§$_________§
            ___$$$§::§§$$$$§§§§$$$§§§§
            _$$§::§§§$$§§$§§§§§§§§§
            $§§§$§§§§§$$§§§§§§§
            §§§§§§§$$§§$§§§§
            _§§§§§§§§$§§_§§$
            _§§§§§§§§§$§§$_§§§
            __§§§§$§§§$§$§§$_§§
            ___§§§§$§§§$§$§§$_§§
            _____$§§§§§§§§§§§$§_§§
            ______§§§$§§§§§§$§§$§_§
            _______$§§§§§§§$$§$$§§_§§
            ________§§§§$$§§$$§§$$§§_§
            _________§$§$$$§§§§§§$$§§$§§
            __________$$$$§§$_§§$§§$§§§§§§
            ___________§$§§$§§_§§§§§§§§§$$§§$§
            ____________§$§§$§§_§§§§§§§§_$$§§$
            _____________§$§§$§§_$§§§§§__§§$§
            ______________\___§$§§$_\_____§§§§
            ________________\__§§§§§_§§__§§§§$
            _________________\_§§§$§§__$§§§§§§§
            ___________________§$§§$§____§$§§§§
            _____________________§§§$§§___§§$§§
            _______________________§§§§§___§$§

            Am I right, folks?

  • ash avildsen

    hey guys – i will gladly do a public response to this on video – and it will be themed as an old-school WWF wrestling promo video, so get ready for some good times. :)

    for the record – Sumerian does 50/50 partnerships with our bands, which is light years beyond 360 deals or standard 13-15% mechanical royalty rate deals. Sumerian’s 50/50 net split profit deals are virtually the best deal a band can get with a record label these days, i.e. bands make more money off their music with Sumerian than almost anywhere else.

    so yeah, get ready for a lesson on the difference between PARTNERSHIPS and PIRATESHIPS, 1989 Randy Savage Style.

    p.s. me working a day job as a booking agent for over a decade to pay my bills instead of trying to live off a record label is pretty cool if you ask me. vince neilstein makes his living off gossiping and selling ad space for W Hotels while people read his gossip. :)

    • msv81

      Get over yourself. Every band on your label sucks. They’re not even worth the hard drive space it would take up on a computer so while I download plenty of music – guilt free might I add – I wouldn’t download any band on your pathetic excuse for a roster anyway.

      BTW, I spend at least 25%-35% of my income on metal related items. I still purchase EVERY album I enjoy, but only AFTER downloading it first to make sure I’m not wasting my hard earned money on horrible garbage like Sumeriancore. Nothing you could say would make me feel guilty about listening to an album before making a decision whether to support the artist or not. I’ve been burned far too many times to do otherwise.

      I attend 5-6 concerts per month. I own 123 metal shirts, over 2,000 CDs, 250 metal DVDs, and hundreds of gigs of digital files I purchased through amazon or itunes. In other words, I spend FAR too much of my money on music as it is without buying an album only to find it sucks. So thanks for your bitchfest but this anonymous poster couldn’t care less what you say.

      • Clint

        “I spend at least 25%-35% of my income on metal related items” and “I own 123 metal shirts, over 2,000 CDs, 250 metal DVDs, and hundreds of gigs of digital files I purchased through Amazon or iTunes”? I’m going to go ahead and call you a liar. A thief and a liar.
        I’m also going to call you stupid. REALLY REALLY FUCKING STUPID. You do know that’s not really Ash, right?
        Yeah, talk about bitchfests. You seem to really like to comment for someone who “couldn’t care less”.

        • Matt

          You obviously care the most clint

          • Clint

            Yeah…….and anyone else like me. That’s kinda been the whole point of this entire exchange, dipshit.

          • Matt

            You really have been taking this way too seriously. Have a beer or smoke a joint. You need to relax because all this anger and hostility is bad for your health. I’m concerned Clint!

          • Clint

            Nah.

          • Matt

            Someone give Clint a cigarette, he’s having a heart attack!

        • WEAD SMOAKER

          HEY DICKNIPPLES(CLINT), YOU ARE WRONG AND YOUR BRAIN IS FUCKED. THE ONE NOT ACTING 13 REALLY IS HIM.

          • Clint

            Whatever you say, Wead Smoker. Believe that if you want to.

      • ash avildsen

        hey msv81 – you want to fight? ill come beat the shit out of you if thats what you want. the bands on my label suck? come say that to my face – ill fuck you in your ass until you learn to love it, little punk bitch. then we can see whos pathetic. ill show you the real meaning of Sumeriancore.

        • ash avildsen

          guys, this is not me. i just want that to be clear.

  • ash avildsen

    Listening to an album in its’ entirety before buying it is not what the video is about. I don’t consider listening to an album music piracy – whether it’s downloaded, streamed, or at a listening party. If you listen to a record before buying it to make sure you like it, more power to you. The point of the video is to let people know the negative impacts on both the bands and the scene when people choose to pirate albums “because the bands never benefit from their album sales.” After researching in to the online music pirate world, I found so many kids saying they steal everything because bands don’t need to sell records anymore and labels are obsolete. That simply isn’t true and if it was, all your favorite touring bands would be unsigned.

    • ash avildsen

      HEY YOU KNOW WHAT ? NEVER MIND FUCK ALL YOU STUPID KIDS !!!! I DONT CARE ANYMORE !!! I HATE YOU ALL !!! YOU CAN SUCK SUMERIANS DICK !!!!! WE ARE THE BEST YOU SHIT EATERS !!!!!! IF I EVER SEE ANY OF YOU ON THE STREET ILL BEAT YOUR ASSES !!!!!!

  • Lucifersmile

    Bands don’t make money off CDs. Period.

    • Lucifersmile

      I’m sorry everyone. I was wrong. I actually looked it up. I’m just stupid as shit. Forgive me.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andy-Benz/552054891 Andy Benz

        Hi Clint!

        • Clint

          Hi!

  • http://twitter.com/stuffuyouwillhate Sergeant D

    The comments on this post are truly embarrasing

    • Matt

      You should write an article about it lol

      • http://twitter.com/stuffuyouwillhate Sergeant D

        I am, actually

        • Sergeant D

          Wait, no I’m not.

          • Sergeant D

            Holy fuck! Hold on a minute……..yes….yes I am. What?!?

          • http://twitter.com/stuffuyouwillhate Sergeant D

            trololol A++

          • Sergeant D

            TROLL! TROLL! TROLL! TROLL! TROLL! TROLL!
            TROLLS-R-US! That’s where you get yer trolls.
            As many trolls as you want! It’s just a giant fucking bridge!

          • Sergeant D

            I’ll pay any dude on this message board to fuck me in the ass “bareback”. No questions asked. Seriously. I’m lonely.

          • Sergeant D

            SOMEONE STOP ME!!! HALP! HAAALP! PLEASE!!! …..somebody……

  • Sergeant D

    OOOHHHHHHHHH SHIT!! OOOOHHHHHH SHIT!!!!!! NO NO! NOOOOOOOOOO! I……..I…..can’t……….CCAN’T………
    I WON’T FUCKING DO IT!!!!!

    • http://twitter.com/stuffuyouwillhate Sergeant D

      trolololololol backed hard

      • Sergeant D

        backed hard
        backed hard
        backed hard

        • Sergeant D

          UUUUHHHHH UUUUUNNNNNNN UUUHHHHHH…..make me a rabbit….NOW……now…..peel that p p p p p pppppp paint off the wall…. HHHUUNNNNHHHHHHHH…….>GULPphew<…..AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!! NOW! NOW! NOW! TAKE YOUR SHOE OFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF!!!!!!!!!!

  • XanderDanger

    I have NEVER laughed as hard because of MetalSucks comment thread. EVER.

    Thanks a lot to everyone, you guys just made my day. :)

    • XanderDanger

      And FYI, I try really hard to fuck any kids who go to my church. That’s pretty much all I’m about. ;-)

  • keller

    I watched the video before reading the article and you said everything I was thinking. Ash’s note on corporate ads on download sites was definitely interesting. Very well written post, Vince. Looking forward to Ash’s response.

  • Scourge441

    My favorite part was when he said that the only bands who don’t see money from record sales are the ones who don’t recoup the costs that the label pays. The problem with that statement is that most bands don’t do that, and that was true before piracy became widespread. I can’t speak for Sumerian’s 50/50 deals or whatever, but they’re most certainly not the norm in the industry.

    If I may use a turn of phrase I heard from Arthur Von Nagel, an album is basically a promotional tool to sell t-shirts. Yes, the music is something that an artist puts literally his entire self into, and that the fans connect with on a deeply personal level, but on a business level, it is essentially a marketing expense.

    I won’t pretend that I buy every album I like that I’ve downloaded, but I’ve certainly spent more on music recently than I would have without it; even if I don’t buy that awesome album I downloaded, there’s a very good chance I purchase the band’s next album when it comes out, especially if it comes with a shirt. The artist is only better off when I pay for music if I pay for the music AND the other stuff of theirs that I’ve bought.

    Basically, piracy opens too many doors in the industry for labels and artists to want it squashed.

  • ash avildsen

    hahahaha looks like people are having fun impersonating me. vince email me so we can get a legit response on here from me.

    • ash avildsen

      or don’t. I could really give a shit less one way or the other. none of the fuckbrains who comment on this site would understand my response anyway.

      • ash avildsen

        i know some of the people here might find this kind of behavior humorous, but it really makes me not want anything to do with this site. i’m trying to seriously reply here vince. if my input is unwanted i’ll move on.

        • Matt Gaipa

          I wouldn’t judge this site by this particular comment thread

          • ash avildsen

            why? because you’ve made some of the stupidest comments here? vince, i really am busy. i don’t have time to keep coming back to this.

  • Betelgeuse

    doo doo

  • Guest

    You know I do agree that piracy is wrong but didn’t Ash pirate software so one thing I will never listen to a thief apparently so Ash you can go screw yourself. You hypocrite

Back To Top
News & Tips?

Drop us a line at news@metalsucks.net