CENTURY MEDIA RESPONDS TO SPOTIFY UPROAR: VINCE RESPONDS TO CENTURY MEDIA

Tuesday, August 9th, 2011 at 2:00pm by

SpotifyCentury Media

Yesterday’s post decrying Century Media’s decision to pull out of Spotify seemed to ruffle a few feathers at Century, so much so that today they’ve decided not only to issue an official response but to write me a personal email! Since this is MetalSucks and we delight in this sort of back-and-forth (and we always like to give the targets of our ire an open forum to respond), I’m going to go through Century’s email and dismantle their arguments one-by-one. Here we go:

Here is a reply from the suits at Century Media on the genius post from Vince at Metal Sucks on why we should be giving away our artist’s music for free on Spotify.

Spotify pays artists. Regardless, I understand that Spotify’s rates are very low; I’m not disputing that.

What I am arguing is that the music industry model of the past 60 years or so — the model in which artists record music then sell that music for a high price — is dead. I’ve argued this many, many times on this site before: music has been overpriced for the past six decades or so simply because manufacturing and distribution have been tightly controlled and unavailable to the masses. With those gates opened, it’s an entirely different ballgame. Recorded music is no longer a viable income option; it is time to accept this fact on move on to another business model.

If you look back in history, musicians (artists of any kind, really) didn’t get rich: they didn’t collect salaries, certainly didn’t get royalties from music sold. They got by on commissioned pieces, residencies, and live performances, but for the most part they created music because they loved to do so; many of them problably had other jobs to make ends meet. What we’re experiencing now is a “correction” of sorts, a correction of the overly inflated musician lifestyle (and supporting industry) the past few decades have afforded us. I liken this to the “correction” the U.S. housing market suffered in 2008 when people suddenly realized, “Hey, wait a minute… all those brand new [ugly] houses aren’t really worth that much after all.” As such, the industry needs to adapt. Everyone needs to get used to making less money. And yes, I totally include myself in that last statement.

The bottom line: any item or service is only worth what people think it’s worth. “Worth” and “value” are nebulous terms that ultimately lie in the eye of the beholder. More on this in a moment.

We always appreciate any help and advice from the community on how to navigate these challenging times, where more and more people feel that free music is a birthright.

Now Vince  tells us “it’s all about the long term not the short term, you dummies”.

Well, that is great news Vince. Our problem is that staff and bands expect payment for recording and rent short term and when I tell them not to worry about the reality of their lives, but to suck it up because somebody will pay them long term, they are not amused.

From now on I tell them not worry about gas and groceries and go and eat at Vince’s house.

I don’t know about you, but all the guys in bands that I personally know (including bands signed to Century Media and plenty of other labels) all get day jobs when they come home from a tour. Come to think of it, I don’t know a single metal musician that survives only on revenue generated from his band’s music. And that is totally ok with the musicians; they understand that the “dream” isn’t a reality. It’s so commonplace at this point that it really isn’t a surprise… it’s just accepted that if you want to make music you’re going to have to do something else to make ends meet. In some cases tours will break even, in some cases turn a profit, in some cases band members will willingly put in a bit of their own money to finance a tour. And you know what? They keep making music anyway! Because they love it! And they would still do it even if no money was at stake! Same goes for the hundreds of “industry” folks that operate on a DIY basis. I’d wager that taking money out of the equation entirely would actually improve the overall quality of music because we’d have less kids in it for the booze/drugs/bitches… but I digress. 

By the way, touring bands are welcome to stop into the Vince Division of the MS Mansion anytime for a nice home-cooked meal of the Ramen Noodles the blogging lifestyle affords me!

I also invite Vince to come work for CM for free, we will expose you to a well of information and music, learn from you how to really run a company and maybe you even have a mate or two who can play music people want to listen to and gives that to us for free or 360 style as well. All the trust fund babies think like that and if you require a salary for the short term I would have to quote my mate Vince:

Well, sucks for them, but frankly not my problem.

Guys, the realities of the music business are way above the polemics of a kid who probably never had to run a company before in his life.

I run MetalSucks, together with my partner Axl, thank you very much; neither of us has worked a day job for roughly two years, and by that measure I’d say we’re a fairly successful company. I have also spent many years working at record labels, both major and independent, a management company and a booking agency before I ever even started blogging. So I’d say I’m quite familiar with how the business works and quite familiar with how to run a company. But it’s cute that you tried to insult me that way! 

Part of my ability to run this company, of course, has to do with the ads placed here by Century Media and several other record companies, concert promoters, etc. For that I am grateful. Running a successful metal blog was not something I ever thought I could do or even wanted to do, until that fateful night Axl and I decided to see what would happen if we launched a crappy WordPress blog and started funneling our thoughts onto the Internet. I look at it this way: this has been an incredible, incredible ride! But some day it is going to end, and that will be ok. If it ends because all the labels go under and all of our ad dollars disappear, I suppose that’s the natural course of history and I’ll just do something that’s actually useful with my life like become a teacher. I don’t live a lush or fancy lifestyle right now and could certainly be earning more if I’d stayed at the major label, but I get by ok, and most importantly I love what I do. 

But I don’t actually believe all the labels are going to go under, because I firmly believe that all the labels (including Century, as one of the biggest metal labels in the world) are going to wise up, turn into Management houses that also invest in bands (unlike current managers), and right the ship. The industry will definitely find a way… that “way” will just not have sales of recorded music as a part of it because ever-changing technology dictates so.

We are asking you a simple question: Does Music have value for you?

If your answer is YES, then please be prepared to acknowledge the fact that the people who bring this music to you, do this full time and need to eat and sleep somewhere  – short term.

It cost about a minimum of $50,000 to $100,000 to have a new master recorded,  promoted, manufactured  and  distributed internationally on a proper scale. Try to remember this when you think it’s cool to steal music. We feel we are bringing value to a community of music lovers who are willing to pay for that music. As long as people do, we will be able to continue doing that. If the majority  of the new entitlement generation feel that  we should do it for free, I can tell you, you will be listening to a lot less new music in the future.

Don’t give me the old tired “music lover” guilt trip… that argument holds no water because it isn’t about me. I love music, value everything that goes into producing it and getting it out to the masses (which I know first-hand from the years I spent working at labels), and do not advocate stealing music. I’m not sure where you read that I advocated stealing music, because I definitely did not say that… where is that coming from?

Here’s the thing about “value:” it’s a very, very, very sticky word. Value is in the eye of the beholder: something is only as valuable as people think it is. If I spend $100,000 on an arts and crafts project that’s near and dear to my heart made entirely out of found materials, garbage, scraps, whatever the fuck… is it “worth” $100,000? To me, yes. To someone else, its value might be closer to $1. Likewise if Madonna takes a shit, tries to sell it on eBay and someone decides to pay $100,000 for it, is it worth that $100,000? Well, yeah, I guess it is. My point: value is entirely subjective and has nothing to do with the cost of what goes into making something.

It’s not about “entitlement:” it’s about reality. People say that recorded music is not worth what it once was. Therefore, that is true. This is how “value” works.

I also don’t buy the bit that we will “be listening to a lot less new music in the future.” We get something like 50 emails a day (maybe more?) from unsigned bands the world over who record entire albums by themselves at little to no cost on their home computers using Garageband. Shockingly, a lot of these recordings sound really, really good — close to as good as or even equally as good as “pro” recordings. I know it’s hard to believe, but it’s true. Technology is cheap; distribution, via the Internet, is basically free. I totally understand and appreciate all that goes into marketing, PR, etc etc — all the things a label brings to the table — and those things absolutely help develop a band. But as far as no new music coming out, I absolutely don’t buy that argument because I know first-hand it is not true. 

We all tried to tell artists, managers and lawyers that the band should give us their work for free. Guess what they said?  “Well if Vince and his mates do not want to pay for it, that sucks, but quite frankly it’s not our problem!”

You know what? It is their problem, it is our problem and it is your problem as well.

I am sorry you grew up in a world where the media and your parents told you that music is free.

It is not! You have been lied to.

No one told me that music is free. I believe it has value. Just not the same value as it once had. Like I said above: the world has dictated that music is not worth what it used to be worth. No sense in fighting this, because “value” cannot be fought: buyers determine value, not sellers.

Rather than bitch and moan about it, take responsibilities for your lives , add value to the metal community and ask yourself: Whose side am I on?

Feel free to ask the 30,000 people (and still growing) who visit MetalSucks every day whether we’ve added any value to the metal community and whose side we’re on. Just because I argue that music isn’t as valuable as it used to be (which it clearly isn’t) doesn’t mean I don’t support metal. I’m just calling it like I see it, in an honest and true fashion. Spotify has proved that the value of music has changed, in no uncertain terms: millions of people agree that unlimited streaming music is worth exactly $10/month. This is not up for debate: it is fact. That is the value of music right now since that is what music consumers have decided. Spotify are not the bad guys here… they’re just responding to the market!

Decide for yourselves if you want to give all you have away for free, do it if you want to, but do not tell other people they should, too.

There are still some real fans out there who appreciate the artist’s work and are happy to contribute to it. These are the people we all work for – not the Vince’s of this world. Sorry mate.

While I believe that recorded music’s value has drastically dropped over the last decade, I believe other sources of a band’s income still have a very high value: live shows and merchandise among them. This is why I advocate a transition from the traditional “record label” model of selling music to an all-encompassing “360 deal.” I hate the term “360 deal” because it carries negative connotations when really it is in fact the exact same thing as a management deal. No one scoffs at managers for taking their 15% or 20%. Why is that? Labels need to become managers and participate in every facet — and income stream — of a band’s career. As managers, you will need to step up and invest money into bands, something that managers do not traditionally do. Label and manager becomes one. I know for a fact that you guys at Century are already doing this with your new management division… so you’re moving in the right direction! Fighting Spotify, a service that will expose your artists to the masses so you can reap the benefits of other income streams, is not the answer.

Sincerely,

The  Suits From CM

Closing statement: If you’re in a band, you should love Spotify because all the new people it exposes to your music will become fans, pay to come to a show, pay to buy a t-shirt, and hey, at least you get some money from streaming as opposed to stealing (by the way: by pulling out of Spotify you are actually incentivizing people to steal!). If you’re a label, you should love Spotify because you will soon have all your bands in management-like deals (there is no way around this) and you, too, will benefit when a fan who discovered a band on Spotify pays to go to a show and pays to buy a t-shirt. Everyone wins. If not right this moment, definitely in a couple of years. Taking your artists off Spotify is bad for business, plain and simple. Your bands need this exposure, now more than ever. Call up your label’s bands and ask them: what do they think of Century pulling their music from Spotify? I bet the vast majority are pissed.

Seriously, Suits from CM, thanks for taking the time to write your response. When Axl and I came up with the stoned idea for MetalSucks five years ago it was completely inconceivable that we’d ever be interacting with the owner of any record label, let alone Century Media.

Sincerely,
Vince Neilstein

  • corrupt_toolbox

    Fair do’s to Century for a proper, human response rather than the typical corporate shite I expected.

    • Labelsaurus

      If by “a proper, human response” you mean dickish, out of touch, and completely juvenile, then, yeah, I’m on board with that.

      • dickpussy

        THIS

      • Tim

        +1

      • nick

        yeah i felt a huge dick coming from century media. why were they attacking vince? no need for that

        • Captain Obvious

          oh, you mean give a decent response to a pretentious little shit like vince?

          century media is right. and vince is butthurt.

          • Go Back to Your Other Screen Name

            But you are still reading MetalSucks. Why? If you don’t like him, just leave. You won’t be missed.

          • Jewcifer

            “…should be named Captain Obnoxious.” What? Who said that?

          • http://thatdevilmusic.net Rob Liz

            Century Media is not right and you’re an asshole.

          • Brother

            Because this guy has probably been working in the industry for decades, and he doesn’t want a Metalblogger telling him “MUSIC RECORDED ON GARAGEBAND IS FANTASTIC!”

            Vince’s whole assessment of value is flawed, because it’s ignoring the fact that people would be purchasing more music if they weren’t stealing it. It’s a two way street. Sellers determine how much they’re willing to sell something for, and buyers determine how much they’re willing to pay for it. Theft takes the Seller out of the equation completely. Record labels have a right to be pissed off, let alone tell bloggers to fuck off.

          • The Greys

            I agree with Obvious. CM made a valid argument and Vince got his feelings hurt.

      • corrupt_toolbox

        Oh, I wasn’t saying I agree with them. I was just glad to see something that didn’t look like Vince had contacted customer services to claim a refund for his washing machine under warranty.

        • Anthony

          I agree with this. They might have been dicks, but at least it wasn’t just so stupid form letter with the blanks filled in.

      • http://www.heavyblogisheavy.com Alkahest

        Indeed. Passive aggressive as fuck.

        • Sam

          A bit unprofessional on CM’s part. Vince, great response man. You are totally right and these knuckleheads are totally wrong. But they’ll rethink their stance, and when they do return to Spotify, they’re going to look even dumber for having had to go through this episode.

      • Sandy n papo

        totally unprofesional, not expected from a multinational company.

        • Memememe

          I’m not saying its the same thing, but how in the FUCK does it cost CM 100k to record an album, and guys like Kenmode/Judd Madden/Cloudkicker/Mark Hawkins/Paul Wardingham do that shit in there free time with computer programs @ home and its sounds frankly the same.

          • stefan

            I think he meant that it costs that much to record, master, manufacture, distribute, and promote an album, which sounds more reasonable.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ryan-Sean-Heron/9391234 Ryan Sean Heron

    record companies are a dinosaur . going extinct and rightfully so. everything they wrote in this letter to vince demonstrates exactly why thats happening. They are so removed from reality and out of touch its actually hilarious. they’re stuck in 1980.

    They’ve got to be joking with that hundred thousand dollars to record and distribute an album bullshit. I could record a professional sounding album on my macbook using garage band and upload it to the internet myself for basically no money at all.

    the days of pressing millions of copies of physical albums and paying some distributor to drive them to sam goodys and the wall locations all around the world are over.

    • OLD

      ^^This. It sure is entertaining to watch this go down, though.

    • Garth

      “I could record a professional sounding album on my macbook using garage band and upload it to the internet myself for basically no money at all. ”

      Let’s see you do it then.

      Let’s see how “professional” it sounds. Let’s see who bothers to listen.

      This is a bullshit statement that people throw around and never back up with examples. If it were true, then everyone would do it. But they don’t.

      What a joke.

      • Memememe

        Kenmode/Judd Madden/Cloudkicker/Mark Hawkins/Paul Wardingham/The United sons of Toil. I’m not going to bother doing actual research to find more but its an absolute fact you can record music at home with a computer program and have it sound exactly the same. Check out Bandcamp. Theres a few hundred bands on there playing metal and most of its recorded by the players themselves, at home. Alot of that music is free as well.

        • Bread

          You specified garage band, which you most definitely can not use to make a professional sounding record.

          Spend a few grand on a home studio however and you can.

          • Brock Sterns

            Ehh, you’d be surprised.

          • James Murphy

            sorry… but that’s a consumer recording magazine fallacy… musicians can buy a few grand worth of gear, but unless they have several years worth of experience doing nothing but recording and mixing , they will turn out albums that sound, at best, like loud pre-production demos… and the proof is in the content…

            …we have been deluged for the past decade (since the advent of hard-disk recording on a consumer attainable level) with DIY recordings and mixes, and they comprise a large part of the reasons for both the mass ignoring of most bands that record themselves and give their music away free, and the advent of “laptop” metal… it has led to very few good recordings unless a pro was brought in to save the mess the band made… this happens waaay too often these days.

            and even when someone does finally attain the experience and skill necessary to work at a pro level, they invariably gravitate towards more pro gear, that sounds better, works better, and costs a few thousand per piece, as opposed to the whole system.

            what DIY advocates seem to be preaching is that music should be written and recorded and mixed purely by amateur hobbyists that have full-time day jobs and just do music in their spare time.

            well lots of artists are like that now… they do music in their spare time… but once they become popular… IF they do…. the demands of touring can make a day job impossible in most cases… and there are a lot of full-time musicians that have enough fans to do it full time, and they SHOULD be able to… but increasingly, they can’t… thanks to an entitled generation that feels they shouldn’t have to pay for anything they can easily get away with not paying for…. that just won’t hold up over time… what the DIY pundits seem to advocate is that all of us, just because some don’t want to pay for entertainment, should just settle for home-recorded music, written and played in free time…

            …well they have that available to them now, and have had for several years… and it’s totally free to download, legally, and with the artist’s support and enthusiasm. in fact, more artists than have ever been signed to labels in history are available NOW… free. self-recorded on a couple grand worth of gear and mixed with hacked plug-ins….

            …so why don’t the DIY/”free media” pundits prove their point by not even listening to signed bands at all anymore, and just go listen to the DIY bands that offer up all their work free? do any of them have the courage of their convictions to make that stand?… will they go listen to only those artists, and never again listen to a dirty signed band that’s sooo greedy as to want you to buy their album so they can afford to make another at higher quality than the DIY crowd, and actually have someone handle promotion for them, so they can focus on their music??

            i suspect not, because like everyone else they prefer bands that happen to be signed and have budgets and are promoted… they just want it to be magically free: “give it away and the interwebz will rain success upon you”.

            too bad 17 years of empirical data on that particular maxim reveal it to be a fallacy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Reagan/520958920 Mike Reagan

    Century Media is so butthurt

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lou-Guberti/804425053 Lou Guberti

      They mad? They mad

    • cougar party

      Seriously!

      • grossj

        They so mad. Vince smoked them. CM sounded like babies. Vince never said ANYTHING about stealing music or getting it for free, and that’s what CM based their argument on.

        Fuck Century Media.

  • holy shit

    Wow, they sound like dicks.

    Also it’s kind of funny how metal labels don’t realize that people who pirate music are like 10x more likely to buy future albums and support bands on tours and buy merch and shit. I’m not just pulling this out of my ass, there’s credible studies all over the fucking place that back this up.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Fabian-Grn/100001053737775 Fabian Grün

      do you have a link to those studies? would like to read them.

      • Ziltoid

        http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/apr/21/study-finds-pirates-buy-more-music

        There you go. It’s not a link to the study, but a simple google search shows a bunch of news articles that cite it.

      • Brendan

        Ya because I honestly don’t think any of my friends, or anyone I know for that matter, buy music at all, just download.
        I, on the other hand, haven’t downloaded music since I used Limewire like 5 years ago and am apparently 100% more likely to buy music than them seeing as I only buy music.

    • Planeswalker

      I download a shit ton of music, and if i like the band enough i buy the album. This guy is right.

      • Bard

        Thirded, I generally get an illegal copy of the album first and then buy it. Infact, I just bought Fleshgod’s ‘Agony’ and Obscura’s ‘Omnivium’ doing just this.

        I will be blasting this shit in my car for ages now.

  • chainchomp

    holy hell………..if anything should bring you to the Peoria, IL area for some reason Vince, let me know. drinks are on me.

  • Someone Smarter Than You

    It’s funny that Metal Sucks is bitching all over the place about this. Century Media is doing what any good label should and watching out for its artists. Whether the label is watching out for its own bottom line in the process is irrelevant. If you want your favorite bands to have the money to put out more albums, you have to give them the money they deserve. Spotify doesn’t do that, plain and simple. If Century Media didn’t care about making good money, this site wouldn’t have got the backing it did in its early stages and none of you would be able to make a living out of this. Any long time reader would agree.

    • Jane You Ignorant Slut

      How’s that Century Media internship working out for you this summer?

    • KC

      Spotify might not pay them much, but labels don’t give a band shit from album sales. I have a couple friends that have been in signed bands and they have said that labels are the worst thing in the world. Yeah they help you record and give you a little promotion, but you can do the same thing yourself with the right resources. It’s not that hard to record an album anymore these days with the technology available to us. Its also not hard to promote yourselves with all the social networking tools at your disposal. $50,000 to record an album? Please. I’ve recorded demos that sound almost as good as label produced stuff. Its not that hard to find a good audio editing program these days.

      • stu1

        Sorry, but your average, joe schmoe new band can’t come anywhere near the means of marketing a record the way a label can. There’s money, experience, relationships, etc involved. The concept that you can sell as many records on your own through facebook is still way way off.

        Also, while bands do tend to get screwed with royalties, the idea that no label pays is wrong.

        • http://www.twistedcritic.wordpress.com Chris

          I don’t think any bands out there really sign to labels because they think the label will just hand them money; they sign because it’ll hopefully get them much more exposure – get put on bigger tours, play bigger venues, etc.. You sure as shit can’t expect radio play, so your best bet is to head out on tour with some bigger bands, and hopefully win over their crowds. Recording costs and home vs big studios may be debatable, but just because you can technically market yourself all over the internet doesn’t mean labels are becoming obsolete . There’s simply way too many bands out there, each with their own facebook, bandcamp, tumblr, twitter, myspace and whatever, all cluttering up the internet. And rising above the rest these days takes either serious label backing, or ridiculous amounts of creativity.

          • stu1

            You got it.

  • Jon Boy

    The fact of the matter is Vince and Axl at MS make far more money off the backs of the musicians than the musicians do themselves. That is why they are able to run this site as a job…much as a musician would like to create music and make money from it. This site is a joke and they rip off all artists they work with by charging them ad rates and colluding with the labels on bands to cover. False journalism at its worse.

    • Jane You Ignorant Slut

      See above, sock puppet!

    • Frank’s Beard

      Except they never claimed to have journalistic credentials… and how is it ripping off to charge ad rates? If a company or artist (mostly company) wants to advertise their stuff how is it a disservice to sell ad space? Metalsucks to my knowledge has never flat out stolen and redistributed music they didn’t have the rights to. I can’t tell whether you are trolling or just way too idealistic.

      • the benthic

        axe to fall…

        • Frank’s Beard

          Exact reason I said “to my knowledge”

    • Johnny

      lol oh no they charge artists ad rates? They should just allow people to advertise for free on the site. Shit Jon with your logic, everything should be free.

      Fucking idiot.

      • Tortiss

        I’ve found some solid bands in the adspace on metalsucks…

      • Alex

        Actually, according to Vince’s logic, everything should be free. Why is it that only recorded music should be free? They should make the ads free, and change their business model too.

    • Shakes Tiny Fist At Sky

      It’s not only money made off the backs of musicians. How many stories in the past two weeks have you recycled from “Number of the Blog” a day after they posted it? And you guys are proud to announce you make a LIVING doing this? Get off your high horses.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/J-Steve-Bergquist/750320482 J Steve Bergquist

      I’ve seen tons of people recently claim this site works on payola, and I don’t get why. There are several regular contributors to the site who all have different tastes, and they all regularly shit on bands the others love. Axl loves iwabo and Vince hates them, Vince likes Shinedown and Axl hates them, Gary Suarez loves Emmure and everyone else hates them. If Metalsucks is trying to suck up to record labels and accept money for good reviews and coverage, then they’re pretty fucking terrible at it. (For an example, look at this very article where Vince seriously pisses off fucking CENTURY MEDIA, who have possibly given Metalsucks more money than any other source.)

      Certain contributors like Gojira, Daath, Revocation, Devin Townsend, and iwrestledabearonce a lot, so they write about them a lot. It doesn’t mean they’re getting paid by labels; it just means they’re using their blog to support bands they like. I’m pretty certain Staind and Evanescence’s label could afford to pay Metalsucks for a review that doesn’t seethe loathing and disgust if Axl and Vince were interested in doing such a thing.

      • cougar party

        “If Metalsucks is trying to suck up to record labels and accept money for good reviews and coverage, then they’re pretty fucking terrible at it”

        This and pretty much everything else. If you want to see what a website sucking up to a record label looks like check out blabbermouth’s review of Queensryche’s new album. FOR SHAME!

    • boazhimself

      hey dumbass, journalism isnt the same thing as blogging. its cute that youre trying, though.

  • jon from nj

    Um…Dear Century Media Suits,

    Vince should run your label.

    Sincerely,

    Jon

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lou-Guberti/804425053 Lou Guberti

    ^^^^

    Sup Sock Puppets!!

  • Charlie Brown

    *mouth fart noise*

    Extreme butthurt. Since when is spotify stealing? why do they talk about stealing so much? Bands will start leaving due to lack of exposure in a few years.

    • OLD

      Exactly. As someone that commented on CM’s official statement said: Spotify is the ALTERNATIVE to downloading

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Luke-Friebel/100000223433378 Luke Friebel

    Get em Vince.

  • Christastrophe

    Well put vince. Century will come around eventually. As soon as Spotify gets bigger and they see CD sales dropping even more they’ll start singing a different tune.

  • Tortiss

    Holy text batman. Is it wrong if I don’t care and am just going to keep downloading AND buying my favorite records regardless?

    • d.o.g.o.b.g.y.n.

      Beats paying $10 a month for Spotify or having an ad-filled music experience, that’s for sure.

    • Pastor of Muppets

      My sentiments exactly.

  • Tim

    Feels good to know that I sent Vince the email that alerted him to them pulling out in the first place. :3 I mean, I know he would have found out anyway but still…

  • http://giantofthemountain.bandcamp.com Lordassenfroth

    i guess i just dont understand their logic. Say i wanted to jam out iced earth’s night of the stormrider RIGHT NOW. Im at work and i dont feel like paying any money so instead of getting a little bit of money from spotify, they would rather me just go stream it off youtube, or google “iced earth night of the stormrider.rar” and not just listen to it as many times as i want, but fucking own the mother fucker. do they not understand that whether they want to give their music out for free or not, its already free and they will never be able to stop it. they should give in and just ride the train, they will never get back to the way it used to be.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lou-Guberti/804425053 Lou Guberti

      Motherfucking THIS

    • Frank’s Beard

      Seriously! I mean who doesn’t want to stream Iced Earth’s Night of the Stormrider THIS INSTANT?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mathew-James-Saunders/1153389571 Mathew James Saunders

        they dont have it on there! :(

        • http://giantofthemountain.bandcamp.com Lordassenfroth

          its century media lol thats why

          • Frank’s Beard

            Ain’t label politics a bitch? Actually the whole industry is that way. Why can’t we all just get a bong?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mathew-James-Saunders/1153389571 Mathew James Saunders

            lmfao! SEE CM?!?! SEE WHAT YOU DO!

    • Alex

      Because if you want to listen to something now, then that object has value. Enough value for you to want it now. It thus makes you a hypocrite when you download the .rar without paying. Them, being the content creators, are the ones that choose how to offer the content to consumers. It’s really quite simple and boils down to respect.

      • Bard

        In a day and age where listening to music NOW is of the utmost importance. See: MP3 Players/Pandora/Amazon’s Streaming Service/YouTube(Vevo) etc. Isn’t it important for the music industry to stay relevant? Wasn’t that their same problem in 1980/1990 when switching from Tracks to CD’s? The Music Industry is ALWAYS behind the fucking times and they keep drowning themselves every time they pull bullshit like this. They need to hop on the streaming business or be fucked out of more potential buyers and they’ll once again have no one to blame but their archaic greed filled thinking.

        Milk that shit while it lasts boys.

      • http://giantofthemountain.bandcamp.com Lordassenfroth

        ha, i give 0 fucks. I spend about 8 hours a day listening to spotify here at work. i will just stream a different band, from a different label and go to their show and buy a shirt and a CD. you see i use spotify INSTEAD of youtube and mediafire, because its at least a little support as opposed to no support. thats the whole point trying to be conveyed here.

  • vedicardi

    I was surprised to see 360 deal advocation here. It is good if the terms are limiting, but a lot of these deals take a lot of RIGHTS away from bands, such as what exactly they get to put on their merch and what merch they sell. Some take publishing rights completely, rather than just taking a cut. That’s why I am opposed to them in general, though ones where the label takes general control without taking the rights.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mathew-James-Saunders/1153389571 Mathew James Saunders

    While Spotify is neat, and I use it for discovering new bands…I love collecting CD’s and owning a physical piece of that band which represents different times in my life that embellish that album. Nothing beats knowing how to open a CD w/o that plastic tape-strip ripping lol

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jon-Little/100000727322349 Jon Little

      I have had that same argument with a couple of friends. I mean sure, you can download/pirate/stream your favorite bands, but I love buying the CD and reading liner notes and memorizing the lyrics right there. The artwork and everything that goes with it is so worth it for me.

      Plus not everyone owns a car with a mp3 plugin thing.

  • Matthew

    First time poster, long time reader.

    I have pirated music. I am part of the problem. However, I do attend shows, purchase merch, and intend to start buying into Spotify in the near future. Twenty dollars for a literal universe of music? Even my cheap-ass can get behind that.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Skylar-Strange/1095951788 Skylar Strange

      Not even 20, its 5 on your computer, 10 to add it to your phone.

  • Dusty

    All of this controversy is kind of dumb, because Spotify sucks anyway. I can’t really “find” ANY new music on there because their browse feature is fucking worthless.

    If I want to find new music, I browse through Bandcamp or let Last.Fm run all day.

    • SourDeez

      It’s not good for browsing for new music, it’s great for instant access to bands you’ve just been recommended. How many times has someone told you to check out a band and then you just never got around to it? Spotify pretty much eliminates that, if most of your new music discovery comes from word of mouth.

      • Dusty

        Yeah…but so does Grooveshark and Grooveshark doesn’t give me an annoying commercial every 2 songs.

        Sure, Grooveshark is user uploaded and there might be a few holes in any given album or lower quality here and there, but it’s not like Spotify has every song in the world either.

        And I’d rather have a few missing songs without the “HEY! THANKS FOR USING SPOTIFY! HOW ABOUT TRYING OUR PAID SERVICE WITH NO ADS!” shit ever other minute.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bosley-Just-Bosley/100002706200650 Bosley Just-Bosley

          grooveshark is mostly illegal. They are real scumbags.

          • Dusty

            That may be, but something tells me anyone that uses Spotify (especially the paid version) isn’t exactly giving too much of a shit. If you are using it as a “I’ll sample this and then buy the album later (whether that be physical or purchased MP3)” type of thing, they both serve the same purpose.

            Again…I don’t see how Spotify offers shit in the way of finding the new music. As the previous reply said, they do a decent job of “Hey, have you heard of X band?” for you to go check them out real quick, but even at that they do it poorly.

            And being “official” in that they give a freakishly small percentage to labels isn’t really an excuse to suck. If anything, they should be using all the marketshare they are getting and develop and even better interface with even better selection and better tools for the customers to use it.

          • SourDeez

            They don’t give a “freakishly small percentage,” they pay the full licensing fees, which are not decided by them. Also, regardless of the ads and whatnot, I’ve discovered about 30 new artists in the past two weeks thanks to Spotify, so I’d say they’re doing a pretty good job for themselves and more importantly for the artists.

          • Dusty

            “According to the an infographic on the Information Is Beautiful web site, which visualizes the different monetization methods available to artists and how profitable they are, if you are a solo musician, at $0.00029 per play on Spotify, you will have to receive 4,053,110 plays per month to earn the U.S. minimum wage of $1,160″

            Sounds like shit to me, honestly. And the few bands I have talked with about it recently have all agreed that Spotify is definitely not real income. It’s “something”, but nothing to look forward to to pay for tours, equipment, or any other expenses. Plus, when you consider their are 3-6 band members usually, that amounts to, as I said “freakishly small amount”. Whether it’s decided by them or not, that isn’t much money considering how many listens that is and considering the fact that metal, by and large, is a niche genre.

            I’m not saying the program isn’t useful in some way, but I’m just seeing how it’s the end all be all.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Josh-Kruk/520503461 Josh Kruk

    I just left a response on Century Media’s Facebook page. If anyone else wants to heres the link:

    http://www.facebook.com/centurymedia

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bosley-Just-Bosley/100002706200650 Bosley Just-Bosley

    Spotify is better than stealing for bands and labels but it still fucks both. They also fuck you the Spotify user. Did you sheep hear about the undeletable cookie that Spotify uses? Yeah it’s so crazy that they can track what you’re doing even when not on Spotify. When caught they didn’t even apologize. Read on to find out how fucked you are, http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/stories/080811spotify

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Corey-Mitchell/660352330 Corey Mitchell

      As is usually the case, there is more than one side to this story:

      http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/08/tracking-lawsuit/

      Sounds like Spotify jumped on this issue ASAP and nipped it in the bud before it became a real problem.

      Of course, all parties involved have PR reps to paint a certain picture.

      • cougar party

        Hey Corey, off topic of this thread, but I have been meaning to ask your opinion about something:

        What are your thoughts on downloading music for free? Being that the future of books appears to be ever increasingly digital in their distribution, I feel like the music industry is sort of a glimpse into the future of the publishing business. Are you concerned about you and your colleagues ability to make a living in the future?

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Corey-Mitchell/660352330 Corey Mitchell

          Hey coog! This is, of course, a huge issue in the publishing world these days. There are, of course, similarities and differences as to how it affects authors versus musicians.

          First, my philosophy about my books has always been to encourage readers to just get their hands on my books in one way, shape, or form. Whether that be going to a library, borrowing a copy from a friend, buying it on eBay, buying it online, in a bookstore, or nowadays, digitally, I simply want potential buyers to read my work.

          Of course, I also went out and hustled every day for a few years to help spread the word about me as an author. That meant driving across the country by myself to do hundreds of booksignings, getting any radio or television interviews I could muster up, and starting up blogs, forums, MySpace groups, etc. that pertained to true crime. Anything to get the word out there.

          And there was a reason why I hustled my ass off and something most bands need to realize when and if they sign with a record label. No one gives a shit about you and your product until you become a proven seller. Publishing houses do not throw money at untested authors beyond a minimal advance. There is almost never any money for promotions, marketing, landing reviews, etc. Seems like a few commenters here believe that record labels are the be-all/end-all of ultimate support for bands. As a former artist manager with bands on both majors and indie labels, I know that is simply unrealistic thinking.

          As an author, don’t expect jack shit. Don’t count on anyone else to give a crap about your work. The only ones who are going to give a fuck are you and your mom. Same applies to musicians. Hell, even as a best-selling author I hardly get squat from my publishing house, and I am with one of the biggest publishing houses in the business. That is partly/mainly of my own doing because I found ways to reach my audience that the publishers never dreamed of, thus, cutting back costs on promotions, marketing, etc., as well as eliminating unnecessary expenses like FedEx charges, outrageously expensive artist fees, etc. That means when royalty check time comes around, I actually see decent amounts of money in my paycheck, unlike most of my other, much older author friends.

          Now, as far as digital books are concerned, of course, it is the wave of the very-near-as-in-right-now-future that is breathing down my (and the publishing industry’s) neck. I do not own an e-reader, though I certainly would like one. Just can’t justify the cost of one at this time. Besides, with two girls to take care of, I hardly read anything but magazines while I’m sitting on the crapper. But, yes, this is where books are heading as well.

          Piracy is not as bad in the publishing world — yet. But it is getting there. There still remains a love of the look, feel, and smell of a book that a CD doesn’t quite have. I’m not foolish, however, as I already have some of my catalogue digitized and am starting to sell pretty consistently in that format. The difference between piracy for an author versus a musician, however, is huge. Authors usually do not have other sources or streams of income. Musicians can sell merch and tour, where they get paid to play (usually). As for authors, unless your name is King, Grisham, or Rice, good luck getting paid to do book signings. Book stores do not pay authors to come and sit for three hours chatting up people who don’t have any interest in purchasing your book. I’ve been lucky (and smart) in that I make all of my booksignings actual “events” so people will buy my books.

          It’s like this book I’m working on with Philip Anselmo — we both want to make the release of it an event. Nothing is set in stone, but I can assure you we will not just let it hit the bookshelves and sit around hoping people will buy it. I’m talking big things here that I cannot discuss yet.

          Hopefully, when that book comes out, and all of my other future releases, those who illegally download it will try to find some way to compensate us for it, whether it be they go out and buy a hard copy, tell their friends to buy copies, or make direct donations to the authors. I can only hope. In the meantime, I will continue to find additional ways to supplement my income through my writing.

          I haven’t had to work another “real” job in ten years. I don’t plan on doing so anytime soon.

          • cougar party

            Cool, thanks for your insight. Can’t wait to read the Anselmo Biography when it comes out!

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-Schnoor/100000513072818 Jeremy Schnoor

            Corey. Every time I see one of your posts on here, the image I get of you is that of Marty O’Donnel. That’s beside the point. Great explanation for your view of piracy, and actual distribution.

          • paganheart

            Wise words, Corey. Your work doesn’t appear on this blog nearly enough!

          • http://www.coreymitchell.com Corey Mitchell

            A note to TGWTM. Thanks for your concern. In the event that the publishing industry gets destroyed by digitization I think I’m set since I have a law degree.

          • http://www.coreymitchell.com Corey Mitchell

            Hey coog! No problem. Thanks for asking and also for your support.

          • http://www.coreymitchell.com Corey Mitchell

            Hey Jeremy! I had no idea who Marty O’Donnel was until your comment here. The Halo composer, right? Also did the Flintstones vitamin jingle? Cool. Seems like an okay dude.

            Take it easy.

          • http://www.coreymitchell.com Corey Mitchell

            Hey paganheart! Thanks, man. Unfortunately, you’ll probably read me even less since I have a book due in a couple of months. I’ll be sure to crank out those Bleeders though.

  • Curmudgeon

    I have no knowledge how a company like CM works or how they make their deals. The only real reason I can see them pulling out of Spotify is that it’s the first (I’m assuming) service to do something like this. Usually the first service is emulated and improved upon at which point, I can see CM jumping on board one of those companies.

  • Tyler Etchell

    FUCK YEAH!!! You go Vince!

    • testes

      Yup.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jordan-Oates/1476540021 Jordan Oates

    Did anybody see their facebook page, and all the comments supporting their decision? Lulz.

  • The Swede

    I have MANY cd:s which I have bought(!!!) and still buying from artists that are signed at CM, not because I like all of I´m just obsessive lp & cd collector.

    Have also been a paying Spotify member since the launch (in Sweden) and use it regularly on my android phone so these news are very dull indeed.

    I scratch your back and you spit on mine… well it doesn’t work like that.

    No more money from me CM.

  • erik

    Good luck getting a job as a teacher Vince. I know so many unemployed teachers it’s pathetic.

    As for spotify, I could take it or leave it. What bloggers need to realize is that Internet exposure isn’t that valuable. Bloggers make it seem like having music streaming online will draw hordes of fans who buy merch to the show. Not the case at all.

    An internet fan who won’t buy a cd for $10 is simply not valuable to a band. Real fans are motivated. They’re the ones who buy the merch and pay the door price to see a show. Internet fans are virtual – they are not real. They don’t matter. Wow, my band got a few thousand streams on Spotify. Guess I’m going to do a world tour now. Nope.

    Unless you’re into corporate rock, music is totally underground now. Spotify ain’t going to change anything. Wow, ANOTHER sight I can stream music from. What a concept. How many sites like this do you need?

    • http://giantofthemountain.bandcamp.com Lordassenfroth

      its not a site

    • SourDeez

      So you’re saying that most of the live shows you attend and most of the merch you own comes from bands who you heard on CDs picked up from the local record store? In 2011, I doubt that’s the case for anyone. You can’t support an artist you’ve never heard, and the internet makes it possible for everyone to hear more music and decide who they like enough to see live. I’ve seen shows and bought shirts from bands whose existence I would be completely unaware of if not for the internet.

  • rich w

    I have no use for spotify. If there is something I like I buy it or download it and have it forever. I’ve always used YouTube to check out new shit. I don’t buy the spotify will make bands gain more fans because the internet has been up and running for many years giving bands exposure, but yet the same bands I’ve watched live in the 90s are still playing to the same size or smaller crowds. Metal is not for the masses and the fan base will remain the same.

    • Nonsensei

      DVD gets scratched to shit. Go buy a new one.
      CD gets lost. Go buy a new one.
      “Ownership” only exists as long as the medium does. Ask the guy who has The White Album on LP, 8-track, cassette tape, compact disc, laser disc, and mp3 if he really feels like he owns it. He owns nothing, he’s been leased a copy for a long as he can keep his devices and media in workable condition.

  • blah

    Not really getting the logic behind the whole ‘the quality of music will go up if no one’s really getting paid for it’ thing. People will still be getting into bands for drugs/booze/bitches regardless. i’ve worked a full time job and made music on the side like a lot of people, and unless you want to have absolutely ZERO social life, relationships, no other responsibilities, etc. the quality of music suffers because there’s simply not enough time. I’m not against Spotify, but if you’ve got millions of users paying $10/month + ad revenue, I think something a little better than $0.002 per stream would be nice. People pay $10/month for netflix, and I can pretty much guarantee you that the royalty deals the movie studios have set up there are probably quite good, why can’t artists have the same?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-Schnoor/100000513072818 Jeremy Schnoor

    So…Century Media……You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about. Every statement you make is completely subjective and doesn’t apply to the entire market of musicians the listeners of the music…Oh, and have you even asked the bands who are signed to your label what they think about their music being taken off of spotify? Artists want exposure guys. They want the exposure so they can have a name in the community, to be known, and to draw in the customer because without you assholes giving these guys the well needed exposure, you’re losing profit because listeners aren’t finding these bands. I don’t really know if Vince already addressed this because I read up to the point of butt fucking centuries retardation’s (somewhere between Vince’s first and 4th rebuttle), but seriously, if Century wants to take their failure into their own hands, let it be. I will still listen to the bands, buy the music, and support the bands by going to shows. So please Century, stop making this entire thing about “business” and start making it about the MUSIC, you tightwad white collar assholes are what ruin the industry. If the bands wanted to do so, they could use Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and fuck, why not even go back and dust off the old Mysapace band page to get their music out. Fuck they could even use Bandcamp, or Intonation Network to get their name out there, and give their music away online while giving the fan/listener to pick up the material (paying with cash) at a show that the band decides to play that. tl;dr? maybe, could some of my points be wrong? yes. But seriously, Century Media, get your heads out of your asses and stop making this whole thing about YOU and YOUR pockets.

  • Jacob

    I’m still currently bound to physical media, and as such I haven’t given Spotify or any other digital service much consideration when it comes to my own music listening. But all of this stuff really fascinates me, and I’ve become pretty educated about it all, and I believe that Vince wins this debate. I love Century and Metalsucks and loud music and paying for loud music. I think this would be an even better argument if both parties stopped calling the other one names (more Century than Vince). Keep this going. It’s beautiful.

  • greatbigmouth

    vince is right on. a sound economic model. if century media is too closed-minded and resistant to accept the fact that the world has gotten smaller and that technology permeates our lives, then fuck ‘em. close-minded people get squashed in the fast paced “modern” world.

  • Joebroni

    “millions of people agree that unlimited streaming music is worth exactly $10/month.”

    This x10000000000000000000000000000000000. I think the advent of a lot of these DIY’er bands/musicians have made labels expendable from a production standpoint. I know there is much more a label can do for a band but when you have cheap recording technology and internet access half of your business model is fucked. The value has shifted from the music itself to live shows and merchandise, like Vince referenced in the post, WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN WHERE ARTISTS GET THEIR INCOME.

    At this point I think people are more likely to download an album illegally, then go see whatever band live and buy a T-shirt. The music will find a way into my library one way or another.

    • James Murphy

      Joe, we’ve had cheap home technology and internet for years… but is that the music that people are downloading and listening to? overwhelmingly no, it’s not… and it’s not due to any shortage of it… the fact is most music stolen and enjoyed illegally is that made by professionals… professionals playing their trade…. musicians, and engineers bringing out the best in the music… and that costs something to produce.

      as i said already in this thread, the “DIY” movement has led to a crushing flood of totally crap sounding “albums”… that judging by the mass exodus from myspace, people don’t even want to listen to for free. Myspace is a microcosm of exactly what you are espousing…. it sucked there, and it will suck worse if it becomes the standard on the larger scale.

      with few exceptions, people still gravitate to music that’s been well produced, recorded, and mixed, and this does NOT describe the overwhelming majority of DIY recordings…. several years of observable data back this up.

      i for one am not a fan of “laptop” metal…. because it generally sounds like exactly that.. laptop metal. there is no better analogy.

      i’m curious, are you a signed artist? because you seem to be sure about where artists get their income…. are you saying they never get royalties? because if you are, that’s just not true.. i do, and so do most every artist i know that has actually sold a decent amount of records in their careers…. i’m just saying, there seems to be an awful lot of assumption going on here in this whole article and resultant thread, that appears to based on nothing more than “common rumor”…. which is always incredibly unreliable in providing the truth or full story.

      • live free or die

        James,youve dropped a shit ton of common sense into argument. I always love the entitlement crowds argument ” i download but i bought a 15 dollar t-shirt at a show”. Thats really keeping em on the road. Helps em pay the rent when they get home to. Fact is,most of these smaller bands are literally starving to death on the road. Times are indeed changing,not for the betterment of the music,im afraid. Lap top metal? Good one!

  • James Murphy

    so…. is it MS’ position that labels should give away the music they pay to have produced for free? how then to stay in business and continue to fund quality music? Via 360 deals which mean taking the artists live & merch revenues? how then would artists afford to even make it to their next show, much less eat, on the road? no, both bands & labels would go bankrupt in this way, and then there would be no more content from such labels for spotify anyway.

    or is Vince saying that bands should all just become bedroom recording warriors and give their music away free themselves? … well then i submit that we’ve had this “model” going on the side for several years, and it’s led directly to a glut of utterly garbage recordings that sound like really loud pre-production demos that no one wants to listen to… and even when they like the bands, and are not technically inclined enough to quantify what’s bothering them, poor recording & mixing quality still leads to fewer spins.

    That particular “model” is part of what led to the mass exodus from myspace… because really, if music fans loved being bombarded by every single unsigned band on the planet’s low quality home demos, they would have been willing to deal with the kludginess of myspace’s user interface for a lot longer than they did.

    Anyway it takes several years of doing virtually nothing else but recording & mixing to become really good at it, and it’s not for everyone… not to mention a significant financial investment in gear and acoustic space (despite the fairy tales that GC/Sweetwater employees try to sell)…. and this is time and money that will not then be spent on writing music and touring, even if you assume there were someone in every band that had the propensity for that work in the first place.

    But are you really espousing “the cult of the amateur”? because if so, there’s a book of that title by Andrew Keen you should really read.

    i’ll also point to a book by a seminal proponent of the “free information” movement… Jaron Lanier, an early internet visionary, and a silicon valley innovator since the late 80′s, that had preached the “gospel of free media” since the early 90′s; “give it away on the internet, and you’ll be rewarded… somehow”. In “You Are Not A Gadget” he reveals how and why he is now an ex-patriot of that movement, and how 17 years of empirical data utterly refutes that so-called “common wisdom”.

    I fear we are headed to a dark age for recorded music if the Vince’s of the world hold sway… it will be the death the “artistic middle class”… and not just musicians, but artists, authors, movie directors, etc, will all feel it to some degree as well… UNLESS fans realize that their vote counts, and that you vote with your wallet, plain and simple.

    yes, music will still be made, no matter what happens… but i’m more concerned with what we’ll lose VS what we stand to gain… Look, I am no luddite, i’m all for progress… it’s just that progress is not “all good, all the time”… no, some progress is culturally bankrupt, and when that’s the case there’s none more dangerously so than that which isn’t obviously so.

    I’m a fan of this site and will continue to be, but I fear there is no paradise at the end of this “yellow brick road”…. it leads only to mediocrity. I salute CM for taking a stand.

    • blah

      Couldn’t agree more. Art without commerce is a hobby.

      • Eloli

        Couldn’t agree more myself.
        Yes, record labels have screwed and screw both consumers and artists (I’ve been there both sides over the years), but on the other hand they give artists a professional framework and still provide necessary infrastructure to make quality music: they’re nothing more and nothing less than a necessary evil within a capitalist economic system.
        There’s a little phrase American’s love to use, and that I, being a foreigner, applaud: Put your money where your mouth is. Labels put money behind the bands think that may appeal to people, and that has a lot of risks involved, especially when it comes to heavy metal.
        Vince’s position in this debate is very cushy indeed, the day he starts his own label, I’ll pay attention to whatever he has to say about label economics. To that day, IMO, he’s just some lame blogger who has a hard-on for Spotify and some kind of beef against CM.
        I’m not defending CM’s answer, but really, Vince, for fuck’s sake, for once get off your supposed higher moral ground and admit you’re just as clueless as everyone is on the future of the music industry.
        Also, you’re nobody to question anyone’s integrity, Mr. “I get all worked up because Motörhead and Slayer use faux nazi imagery and some obscure bm band goes by the Black September monicker, yet I have no problem interviewing Varg Vikernes because he’s popular and brings traffic to my shitty blog”.

      • fester

        no, art without commerce is art.

    • Dusty

      Go James! \m/

    • Alex

      +1. You’d think humanity would learn at some point that the labels “free” and “unlimited” come with asterisks, usually leading to a higher hidden cost.

      • Bard

        God dammit, you people are like fucking political officials here. He never said artists should give out their music for free, we want CM and it’s artists back on Spotify. Stay relevant, paying for streaming music is not equivalent to stealing, giving the consumer options is not stealing, that’s just a smart business practice.

        CM is the one who’s trying to turn this whole thing into a pirating vs physical media thing and it’s fucking old. If I want to buy digital who are you to tell me my ten dollars isn’t good enough when I could just as easily go pirate it and boom, mission accomplished without anything going to either your label or the artist. It’s a shitty choice I have to make but I can’t afford to waste 20 bucks in gas+10-15 bucks on a CD when I want new music and that’s what this is about.

        • James Murphy

          the majority of users of spotify here in the US so far are using it for free.. they are not paying.

          so by your logic, because i could actually steal a car, and pay nothing at all, the dealership should sell me it to me for any price i want, so that i won’t just steal it? cool… $1 car, here i come.

          somehow though, i don’t think that’s gonna work out for me…. i don’t care to here that it’s not the same… it is.

          FTR, I’m an independent contractor, i work for myself.

          • Beauzaque

            That’s a very poor comparison. If the average Joe goes out to steal a car with no prior experience, it’s pretty much a given that he’s going to get caught and serve some time. That doesn’t happen when the average Joe decides to illegally download some music. The required effort and risk of the two situations are too different.

            A better comparison would be that someone is hiking through the forest and finds a wallet on the ground. Now, the majority of people are just going to take any cash out of it and toss the wallet aside. Maybe a decent number of folks would return the wallet but keep the cash. A very small minority would return it with the cash still there.

            The music industry dropped it’s wallet in the forest years ago when digital media was in it’s infancy. They either dismissed or struggled against it rather than adapting to try to make it work for them. it Now all they can do is hope to make the best of a bad situation. Just like you would go about cancelling all of your credit cards and ordering replacement whilst buying a new wallet, the labels as well have to change how they do business (which may mean the daunting task of nearly reworking their entire model) if they want to have any hope of survival.

  • wha?

    I’d be curious to know how the bands that are signed to CM feel about this, since it is their music we are talking about here.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Skylar-Strange/1095951788 Skylar Strange

      This. When CM makes their rosters feeling known, then it would be easier to get an idea of whats going on.

    • wha?

      From Cristina Scabbia’s FB page:

      Q: What are your thoughts about your label, Century Media, pulling all of the music from its bands off Spotify?

      Cristina Scabbia Official: Don’t even let me start.

  • cougar party

    Vince, I think you are 100% right on except for one little thing – I think you are wrong about the value of music.

    The value of music hasn’t changed. People value music as much or more than they ever have. The difference is it can be acquired illegally, with no risk, for free. It’s not less valuable, it’s just really easy to steal.

    If you could go into a grocery store and steal their products with no repercussions, people would do it all the time. It wouldn’t make food less valuable, it would just be easier to take without paying for it. Basically, the majority of society, if left to the honor system, will just take advantage of anyone they can.

    That being said; the dam has broken. There is no way to stop people from downloading music for free. The labels will need to change or die.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Arquillo/100002159392127 Tom Arquillo

      Good analogy, however I would liken it to coming up with a hydrogyn car and all of a sudden oil is worth .05 cents a gallon. Why? Because technology advancements made their business model obsolete. Bottom line is Vince is correct. The market dictates what the worth of something is regardless of how we got here.

    • Anonymous

      But value IS subjective. If I think a TV dinner isn’t worth 5 bucks I’m not going to buy it. I wouldn’t pay 10 bucks for a Britney Spears CD (or anything for that matter), but I’d happily pay 20 to 30 bucks for BTBAM’s Colors. Value is also affected by attainability. If everyone starts pirating music (general note: stop calling it stealing) the sellers will either go out of business or lower their profit margin. Albums are cheaper than they were 20 years ago for a reason, y’know. 

      I wouldn’t pay much for Mozart’s work, but someone might pay 100x what I would because they see more value in it. Value IS subjective, sorry. 

  • Fred Durst

    lol century media mad

  • John

    CM and MS both sound like cocksuckers. I’m not surprised.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Grey/589071228 Mark Grey

    Both sides have some pretty valid points here. I’d argue that until the overarching culture changes, Century Media does have a responsibility to its artists to protect whatever revenue streams they may have, especially since that’s the way the industry at large is still functioning. They’d be at a considerable disadvantage if their artists at all felt that they were handing out their music for less than other labels might fight for.

    But Vince is right about the changes in the classic distribution model, and this is something every serious independent musician is probably already aware of. The nature of record deals themselves, especially the “sign your life away for a production budget ON LOAN” type are becoming totally irrelevant in an age where a few grand can buy a serious amateur a more than decent Pro Tools setup. Especially since the success and longevity of these deals is nearly always determined by the dying medium of CD sales – look at what happened recently with Roadrunner and Mutiny Within.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joe-Pitz/772617111 Joe Pitz

    With their references to stealing music and working for nothing, I think the “suits” might not actually know what Spotify is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gary-Schmidt/100001425944456 Gary Schmidt

    y’know, i dont always agree with everyone’s musical taste here (really i hate everything especially anything near “melodic”) but i stick around for days like this. vince, you are the shit. and the rest of you are fantastic writers that put across the point of view from a “real” place.
    keep it going and fuck people that fear change.

  • JJ

    Music is art and all art is subjective. It’s no way to make a living when most of that which is created will only ever appeal to a certain amount / group of people. The problem is, it’s hard to tell how big that actual group size is and lots of bands and labels will through their hard earned cash out there to see just how big it is. I’m a firm believer that touring non-stop and playing any and every show will only get you so far. Once you get that core group figured out you’re really not gonna expand much more on it until you either record a better / more accessible album or finally boot that front-man who thinks the chicken prance looks awesome when he does it.

    If you want to make money in this life, leave the arts and anything that can be considered subjective as a hobby. If it takes off because you are more appealing than the rest then awesome but don’t count on it happening.

    • blah

      bull. if artists didn’t try and follow “the dream” and just treated it as a side hobby, most wouldn’t be putting in half the effort to make something worthwhile.

      • okarma

        that’s not true man. just because people don’t do it for their income doesn’t mean they don’t care. lots of people don’t half-ass their hobbies. they enjoy the effort that goes into it just as much as the reward of the finished product.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Corey-Mitchell/660352330 Corey Mitchell

    Hopefully, Eyal will pipe in on this issue since Daath is signed to Century Media. Would love to read his thoughts.

  • James Brown

    Artists and labels could save money by not advertising on websites. It’s a complete waste of money.

    Nobody buys music cause they saw an ad.

  • Anthony

    I just illegally downloaded the new Trivium album, right before ordering a bunch of shit from Amazon (Great Southern Trendkill for $7 motherfuckers!). What do I win?

    • Fred Durst

      A fail. Why the hell would you download Trivium? So you can smash your computer, just destroying the album file, in a metaphorical rant against corporate metal?

  • Lucifersmile

    I 100% agree with you, Vince.

  • okarma

    century media, get real for a minute. Forget the moral issue on pirating music: Do you think ANYONE is going to buy one of your albums because they can’t find it on spotify? Or will they listen to other equally-good artists on spotify instead?

    nowadays, it’s a privilege to be heard, period.

    i’ll see you on spotify in 6 months.

  • James Murphy

    Free isn’t always better… and those who are preaching it for music are selling you a bill of goods that you won’t see the invoice for until it’s too late to opt out.

    • James Craig

      James (and I think I know who you are, Mr. Self-Employed Recording Engineer from Florida, and great guitarist on top of that), the points you make are absolutely valid. You have to look at the bottom line, though (list of cliches to follow): things have changed, the cat’s out of the bag, there’s no going back, and so on and so on. NOTHING is going to return the industry to the olden golden days, and there’s absolutely no way to change people’s minds about how they’re going to obtain their music. The industry must adapt to this shift in any way they possibly can, or they will die. Period. All of the debates and arguments from all sides of this issue aren’t going to change this fact one iota, even though there are great points coming from all sides of it. I understand that this will affect your livelihood as well, and I cannot give you advice on how to adapt since I’ve been out of the business since the mid-90s. All I can do is point out that the bottom line of this entire debate is pretty much absolute, and barring legal remedies (which will most likely just continue to chase consumers away), there’s no going back.

      • James Murphy

        over and over and over again… until we are all literally blue in the face, none of us are saying anything about wanting to “go back to the olden golden days”…. the industry is absolutely looking for a workable new model…. one that keeps quality music flowing… i can’t say that any more clearly than i already have, so let’s please stop beating that dead horse.

        … but the answer is NOT… and will NEVER BE.. that quality productions will continue to be turned out for zero compensation for the finances, effort, and talent put forth on the task… no one else in the world, in any endeavor whatsoever, would continue to spend money that is not remunerated in any way. So… for probably the hundredth time for me personally… YES, things must change, things have already changed, and things will change more still… but embracing change can never equate to embracing being a money-losing venture.

        And Yes, there’s no going back to the older mentality… but there’s also no possibility that professionally produced music will continue to be made in quantity and just given away totally free… that’s not a “business model”… there is NO magical way in which this can ever work for those investing their money, time, talents and skills in producing music for public consumption. (there are plenty bands that do it DIY style, but by and large no one pays them any attention). And i can’t stress enough that for 99% of working artists, tour & merch revenues JUST manage to keep the band on the road.. there’s no money left for recording budgets or Metal Blog banner ads.

        until people wrap their heads around that, and just stop… seriously, just stop… with all these pie-in-the-sky idealistic platitudes about how “you gotta think outta the box”, or “the cat’s outta the bag”, & “you gotta adapt or die”, and realize that the adaption is already underway, and that no one is trying to put the cat back in the bag, but that this will not mean that it will suddenly become legal for them to download any music they want, free of any charges at all, as a general rule. Whether it’s downloadable media, new media, or stream-able, subscription based content, there WILL be always be costs attached to quality music… folks need to realize that the same rules apply to music as with anything else that you enjoy in life: that the only way to get what you really want is to vote for it in the ONLY way you truly can… with your wallet.

        music won’t go away in any event.. but judging by how utterly ignored the tens of thousands of bands that give away their music for free are, i’d say that most people, despite what many will say, really do like the filter and QC that labels can provide…. otherwise this wouldn’t be an issue at all, because all labels would already be out of business, and myspace would be booming.

        a simple rule of thumb that i live by is that if like a band, and hope them to be able to make another record, i buy their current one. this is common sense.

  • You Don’t Know Me

    Wow… Century Media, way to be fucking crybabies about this. “WAAAHHHH!!! SOME WEBSITE IS MAKING FUN OF OUR DECISION!!! WE MUST MAKE FUN OF THEM BACK!!!” How old are you? A 5 year old would make a more mature decision then that! I’m all for artists making money and such but Vince is making A LOT of very good points here. Plus, you pull out of Spotify but you let iTunes rape your artists paychecks? DUMB!

    10 years ago, I’d look at labels to see what artists they had and always looked forward to a new release from Century Media or Nuclear Blast. It was almost like a seal of approval of some sort. Now labels barely factor into the equation. Hell, if artists wanted to, they could ideally record, distribute, and promote their own music fairly cheap. The only bitch would be touring but from what I understand, it wouldn’t be much different than what indie labels provide.

    Vince, you’re right. The old model doesn’t hold up. A new model must be created. “Long live the new flesh” so to speak.

  • Krang10

    Sorry Century Media…I don’t buy your stuff anymore, why would I? Oh the immorality of stealing…umm it’s 2011, my fucking morals went out the window quite awhile ago. I am a poor 25 year old who went from buying CD’s to discovering he could get ANY music he wanted for free and I don’t believe I’m going back. I listen to all sorts of stuff, Metal, rock, EDM, hip/hop, classical, etc…and I am not about to start paying for it again. But I sure as hell would pay $10 a month for the ease of streaming from anywhere though. I put hours upon hours of my time into my 120 GB ipod, making playlists, and deciding what I actually dont really enjoy all that much anymore, its a lot of work. I do, however, still go to a lot of concerts, but only if the band is good enough to my ears. Labels…Im going to steal your shit and I do not feel bad about it. Quit signing so many shitty fucking bands and make some money off me from streaming and concerts.

  • http://www.thepathlesstraveledrecords.com The Path Less Travelved Records

    don’t think anyone agrees that downloading and not paying anything for music is OK. But labels like CM need to realize that the old way of doing business may not be working and they need to adjust their model. Dumping $100,000 into a band is the problem. Quit looking at your bottom line and start at the top and cut. I’d love to see what a smaller label could do with $100,000 budget.

    I think the big labels are losing their grip and smaller bands are finding if they can deal with the BS that goes with distribution, production, PR, etc., they can do it themselves. Most bands just want to play and let someone else take care of the details and be a manager and that’s where I see labels going.

    I’d love to know which band on CM they’ve dumped $100,000 into. Christ almighty.

  • octillus

    http://youtu.be/2TRXzXG_gpo

    Carnivore spoke the truth.

  • Luke Phillips

    Well said Vince, I have lost a lot of respect for CM over the last couple of days, firstly for the terrible descision to pull from Spotify, but then to follow it with this childish letter? These guys do not seem at all profesional.

    • James Murphy

      yeah, sure, because it’s totally professional to just give away everything for nothing, right? and the magic internet fairies will reward them?

      did you miss the part where they gave Spottily a try for a few weeks and it wasn’t working out?

      or are all of you with this mindset so dead-set to get something for nothing in the name of “progress” that you’re really this blind to the fact that it’s not improved music in any way?

      maybe you are, but there will be a tipping point before long where even the zealots won’t be able to deny that new content has well and truly gone down the drain…. you can’t get something from nothing, and you can’t squeeze blood from a rock…. and live & merch numbers have not benefited quantifiably, and certainly not to the degree that recording budgets can be covered…. Several years of empirical data doesn’t lie, and it’s not getting any better. no, the only thing benefitting from “free” music are beer, pot, & cigarette budgets.

      • Bard

        James Murphy=CM’s PR Head lololol. Sadly, it’s probably fuckin’ true.

        • James Murphy

          hardly

        • Josh

          Umm…maybe you should catch up with your metal history if you don’t know who James Murphy is?

          This is presuming that it’s the real mr. Murphy, but I see no reason not to believe so.

          • Finally

            This is the real James Murphy, I can tell from his writing style.

          • Obituary$#@&*

            Umm…if you think it’s the real James Murphy, then you seriously need to put down the crack pipe.

          • Obituary$#@&*

            And if it is the real James Murphy, HE needs to put down the crack pipe and wake up in the 21st century. Whine all you want about how it used to be so great in the old days, but that model is toast. This from someone who has spent literally tens of thousands of dollars on music in my life. So don’t give me that holier-than-thou bullshit about theft or not respecting the artists and their work. WAKE UP DEAD!!

          • James Murphy

            to Obituary$#@&…. i neither do drugs, nor do i “live in the past”.. i embrace new technology, usually before anyone i know, and i am very open to new business models… but only to ACTUAL, real-world, applicable, workable models…. not pie-in-the-sky dream-models where free, high-quality media rains from the sky with no bad consequences to it’s creators at all… because that model has been sought for a decade, and no one’s found it yet, for a reason: it doesn’t exist. Ad revenue is a joke for everyone except the aggregators of content… both legal (e.g., Metal Sucks) and illegal.

            oh there’s plenty of free music out there… legal, free music, and we’ve had it for several years.. more bands than have ever been signed to labels are out there now… dying to give you their music for free via download (just go back to myspace to find them). But, no one cares… no, they want the stuff filtered by, and financed by, the labels…. they just don’t wanna pay anything for it…. and as soon as anyone says anything that threatens to encroach on that massive sense of entitlement with reality, you get the type of vitriol and unworkable platitudes you’ve thrown at me.

            hey, you ever notice what happens when you stop putting gas in your car (or stop charging it up if you’ve gone “green”)? yeah… it stops running. well, music will never stop being made… it’s just that as soon as the last labels pack it in, we’ll have only the type which most of you are ignoring now… the DIY type. and let’s not pretend that’s “fine”, ok? because if it were, you’d be listening exclusively to music from those sources NOW… and not worrying about this debate, because it wouldn’t matter to you.

  • 0contaminated

    spotify sounds like a win but i use youtube to sample music. so century media has some whack bands anyway. relapse, metal blade, have tighter bands and 2 or 3 other metal labels. kinda like “victory records” there was issues with the manager or what not over there i cant really rememeber but it wasnt a bummer for me only cause they have a whole line of bands i didnt even like. kinda the same the goes for here. i thought cm was almost dead anyhow

  • Ethan

    If it cost so much money to put out a record they should stop putting out shitty ones

    • James Murphy

      2 things about “shitty” records…

      some “shitty” is subjective… in other words, what may be shitty to you may well be life-changing and/or genius to someone else….

      as for objectively shitty records… the ones that just sound terrible to virtually everyone…. the majority of those these days are a symptom of the cuts in budgets that downloading has already caused, and it’s only going to get worse… because it IS cheaper to make shitty records, by and large.

      • Finally

        I agree with James

    • Ziltoid

      I agree. Sadly, the shitty ones tend to be the ones that sell the most.

  • disagree

    Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it’s done, they’ve seen it done every day, but they’re unable to do it themselves.
    -Brendan Francis Behan

  • Bishop

    Let’s think about this…Just because streaming is made available to music lovers for an avoidable price does not mean said music lovers will stop buying hard copies or digital copies of music. The very word “stream” indicates that said music lovers will not have access to “download” and in turn “own” the music, rather they will be accessing the music for a limited time during a “live” streaming session. The exposure given to bands from the new music lovers will actually have the adverse affect that the labels are concerned with (i.e. no one will buy our artists music). In reality this exposure may cause music lovers to purchase more music to have readily available to them without having to login or plugin. Especially if its a damn good band that we want to hear more of.

  • Obey the Badger

    God, it’s like I’m surrounded by my grandparents who always wanted to go back to the way things were and hated change.

    The music business is forever different thanks to Napster, whether you think it’s good or bad, and it’s time to find a new business model. I’d guess that people pirate less music if it’s available to them on Spotify, and the artists are getting paid! What more do you want? I guess you want to go back to the old dynamic where pirates pirated, record labels lost money suing everyone, and you still were losing money.

    Collect your CD’s people, because they’ll be a collector’s item someday!

  • http://heavymetalist.com TheHeavyMetalist

    Vince won that argument, the CM guy was kinda off topic really. But I do think running a website such as think seriously pales in comparison compare to running a lable like century media.

    I think both these guys needs to do their homework a little more, because if Vince knew how to make it work, you would be reading this site to get info on the new release from Metalsucks records, not opinions…

  • tenyearsgone

    Vince, please respond to Mr Murphy. Post your response tomorrow. I would really love to see it.

  • Ganbou-Ki

    This saga is disgustingly unnecessary.

    Do we really need to single out and shun a label for not being part of this ‘way of the future’? To be quite honest, the motive behind excluding themselves from Spotify is irrelevant to the average listener; whether Century are genuinely looking out for their artists or have some evil corporate agenda should not even be considered, because it’s not as if Spotify is the only means by which you can listen to CM bands. Do you look at a friend differently if they choose to not use Facebook, whether they dislike it or simply not have the time to use/care for it? You can still IM them, or talk to them in person; just as you could stream bands on CM elsewhere, or buy a CD.

    If a film was created with a budget of $10m, screened in theaters indefinitely and at any time you wished, and did not exist at all on the internet, would you not just go and see it time and again? Sure, the director/actors/whoever was involved in the actual creation of the film, where the creative process lies, would gain some money back in this way. But not a lot. I would wager that hardly anyone goes to buy the DVD if they can just go to see it at any time, and know that they’re supporting the creators.

    I see many Spotify users are happy to pay the monthly fee/s to stream their music, and of course know the artists are receiving -something-. But I get the feeling that after that fee, to them, nothing else needs to be bought/collected/whatever, like CDs. Of course, there will be Spotify users who pay for both the streaming service and the bands’ merch/physical music. But I’m gathering that it’s far more profitable (and in my opinion, much easier) to listen to music for free, and buy CDs/merch according to what you really enjoy. I don’t believe that a perfect world would feature free (illegal) music from the internet, but then a perfect world would lack money, would it not? We also have to take into account the legal means by which we can listen to free music – I’m finding more bands nowadays with their own streaming from their website or social networking pages via Bandcamp or Soundcloud etc.

    The current situation with royalties etc for bands is not ideal. Spotify is a good idea. But it’s not perfect, and if a label such as Century Media choose to not be part of it then if anything people should embrace the questions as to why; to gain a different perspective on the issue. Feel free to use Spotify – but everyone can live without it – and don’t blacken the names of those who choose to be different as you ride the bandwagon.

    • Todd

      We’ll, it’s the comments section of a blog, so judging the thread based on its necessity is somewhat beside the point. I don’t believe that Century Media is herein being “shunned,” just criticized for a poor business decision that will ultimately hurt them and their artists. They are, perhaps, being singled out, but only because they’ve made themselves the current event with regards to this topic. I’ve seen similar responses sent in the direction of numerous labels who have made similar decisions in the past.

      Much of this stems from entirely-justified frustration. We’re music fans. We love musicians and want to support them, and we want their labels to support them. Limiting fans’ access to legitimate channels for music–especially when other channels are readily available–supports neither the fans nor the artists. It supports a few pocketbooks, but (as Vince pointed out), even that is short sighted.

      And when a fan and direct participant in their business model has the audacity to call them out on this stupidity (at the risk of his own pocketbook, no less)? They respond with insults. They call him a thief, a champion of thieves, a deadbeat, an irresponsible whiner, an enemy of musicians, and an incompetent business manager (though somehow still sufficiently competent to garner an audience for whose advertising rights Century Media is willing to pay).

      In that light, many of the above responses seem entirely necessary.

      • Frampler

        Todd, you said absolutely everything that needs to be said there. Well done. And well done Vince for such a rational response.

        • Ganbou-Ki

          I’m not one to cook up or agree wildly to conspiracy theories, but I would not at all be surprised if there’s more to Vince’s views on Spotify than an opinion. The Spotify supporters also stink of sycophancy to me. Nonetheless, at least Century Media didn’t have to pay for ads to achieve such publicity.

          • Obituary$#@&*

            “I’m not one to cook up or agree wildly to conspiracy theories”

            but here goes one anyway.

            grow up tinfoil hat boy.

  • Jimbo Jones

    I just checked the artist roster at Century Media.

    Earth Crisis, Iwrestledabearonce, Sick of It All, Suicide Silence.

    What’s the problem? I’m glad I won’t accidentally listen to one of these aforementioned bands now. Jeez. That was a close one.

  • The Hanging Brain

    The butthurt is strong with this thread.

    Valid points from both sides, but the bottom line is, you embrace change or you embrace death.

  • CrownofWorms

    I think MS needs to point out James Murphy’s words.

    • Sarah Palin

      You betcha! It’s his name up there so it’s gotta be him. Amirite?

      • CrownofWorms

        Even if it is nor James Murphy himself. He makes valid points.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Berberian/601567076 Michael Berberian

    As a label suit myself I’ve got a few things to say :

    - Suit

    Ah, the trademark metal sucks humour and cliché…
    I hate that word and I never wore a suit in my life – again a media trying to pass up as the bad guys while we are the machine steaming the whole system – including the banners that are displayed on your site. You call us suits, should I call you Paparazzi? All photographers are Paparazzi? All journalist are sold out, English press, tabloid writers? Why the cliché?
    Back to banners :
    It’s OK if you make money for your work, but not us?
    Let me give you an example :
    If I was copying your site content and putting it somewhere else one, an exact clone of it, and I was selling ad on it, you’d feel ripped off right? I’m not sure you’d be happy.
    But the worst thing is that a wise ass journalist will come and say “come on, you’re greedy”, crack quotes from a bad 90′s self-fulfillment book such as “your business model has to change”, “you got to think outside the box” , and the worse one of all : “after all it’s good promotion for your writers!!!!!!”

    - Music is expensive for the past 60 years

    I quote : “If you look back in history, musicians (artists of any kind, really) didn’t get rich: they didn’t collect salaries, certainly didn’t get royalties from music sold.” and later pointing out that most musicians had to get a daily job, and that’s OK, is a GROSS historical mistake and is, actually, the kind of mentality that will drag down quality.

    1st, on the salary parts : if you look at, for example, Vienna – who’s been a stronghold for culture for over 250 years now
    Since 1850, Classic music directors were famous and well paid. And based on talents only (Malher, in a country that was getting wildly anti Semitic)
    Musicians were paid, and pretty well for the timel, and didn’t have to get a “daily” job. Because it is pretty clear that to play on that level, you CANNOT do anything else.

    Of course you can go back more in time and say Mozart was poor. But the natural evolution of things, was that musicians were able to live from their music because it is clearly a full time job to play and understand music on that level. That evolution changed its course since 10 years as it became much harder for an artist to live out from your music. And to me, it is NOT an healthy thing.

    Before you answer anything foolish, I need to make clear two obvious things :

    - Of course I’m not advocating that all musicians should be able to live from their music, there’s plenty of bad one out there. But the natural selection will separate the good one from the bad ones. But in an economy where there is NO money, even the good one won’t make anything.

    - no, it’s not OK that some genre of music have now to rely HEAVILY on government subsidies to survive (again, referring to classical music here). I am not for government and art. Why? The answer is pretty obvious : Staline, Mao, Hitler, etc.. And I’m sorry, any kind of government that would give grant to art based on subjective criteria. They would somehow try to control it, and I’m against it. For here exemple here Hip hop gets the subvention jackpot, not metal. Why? I don’t know, it is wrong, and another exemple why art should not in any case, depends on government.

    Music has never been so accessible, so widely exposed as today. Cd price is constantly going down for the last 10 years. I remember paying way over 20€ for a new CD when I was a kid, while now the price for a new release would be below 15€. So Cd price did went down, and that’s not even taking into account inflation.

    - Professionalism :

    So, by encouraging things such as Spotify, you are basically, as you stated before, lowering revenue for the music industry. For everyone, whether it’s the manager, the artist, the labels… Therefore, discouraging professionalism, meaning less artist / label would be able to fully live from their music. And I’d rather have a guitarist fully concentrated on his guitar than a guitarist working shifts concentrating on paying his bills.
    And the argument saying that labels are obsolete, music is too expensive, etc. saying that is just proving you do not realize how many people are involved in the success of a band. No, a manager is not enough… You need a marketing team, you need a solid distribution, whether it’s physical or digital (why do you think we have to fight to get 1st page Itune placement? Don’t you think they’re gonna sell that at some point?). You need a label to finance your 1st tours, which will in any case make a loss.. Labels are not yet obsolete, exception made of NIN and Radiohead who were already huge, most bands trying to cope without a label failed. And not artist are even capable, or don’t want to be bothered, with the business side of things! They hire a manager to represent their interest (think of it as a lawyer, or adviser in a way) to the label who’s the company taking care of ALL the rest.

    And by the way, trying to merge management and label is a VERY bad solution. The manager would be the person advising you on your business decision thinking about what’s best for the artist. The label would think about what’s best for the label. Without this balance, things would be biased.

    - To conclude on spotify :

    It’s not because music is widely, widely hacked that it makes it OK to give us 0.00000000000001$ (exaggerating, but not that much) per stream.

    It’s been proven that big sites like Megaupload, rapidshare, etc, now part of Google top 50, making millions, are actually financing and paying the “content suppliers”, that means the hackers group in china, Malaysia, Russia, etc
    The more download those people get, they get PAID. Megaupload and rapidshare sells gold accounts, you need gold accounts to download your Cds, your latest episode of Dexter..So they incite pirates to upload as much and as fast as possible, by paying them
    HOW WRONG IS THAT?
    So we’re not fighting “freedom fighters” here that are giving you access to our content for free. We are fighting organised crime here.
    And Spotify, by giving us 0.000000001$ per stream and making a killing on selling ad and special accounts, etc. They’re just thieves with a tie, to keep the cliché. “look, we’re paying you with crumbles, it’s better than being stolen right”? It is the same mentality as firing European and US workers to hire 100$ a month workers Vietnam or Bangladesh. I’m sorry, it is morally wrong to enslave people in poverty. it is morally wrong to pay 0.0000000000001$ a song for a Beatles or David Bowie song and being able to play it anytime, anywhere you want. It’s not as big a crime, granted, but it’s the same mentality.

    • Beauzaque

      Ok, a few things.

      1. It was the Century Media e-mailer that self-identified as a “suit”, not Vince. It was not, as you stated, “trademark Metalsucks humour”. It paints your argument in a negative light to take a shot like that right off the hop.

      2. Regarding musicians being payed in the Classical era and earlier, you are correct. However, the point is that they earned their income in an entirely different fashion, as they certainly couldn’t sell recorded music back then. As we are passing into another new era, and witnessing the decline of physical media, bands and labels are going to have to adapt and search out new sources of income to replace it.

      Spotify or similar services are ever likely to be a part of this. Personally, it doesn’t appeal to me, as ISPs in Canada have bandwidth limits. I also feel that $10/month is cheaper than it needs to be, and would expect that price to go up as the service rises in popularity, much like is currently happening with Netflix. My advice to labels would be to not sign any streaming deal for a flat rate, but rather a percentage of profits in order to benefit from this inevitability. Or perhaps even attempt to band together and establish a streaming service among the labels, giving you control over the service fee. However, it’s important to realize that Spotify has now made it to America precisely because enough labels have agreed to support it by licensing their music to them.

      3. Your account of how many people are involved in making a successful band: I have no doubt that what you say is true about how things have been done up to this point. But with the way things are going, it may not be how things can continue. Change is being forced upon the industry. This is a frightening prospect that I’m sure, being part of a label, has been staring you in the face for the past 10 years. It sucks, but there’s no avoiding it. Unless labels can find new ways to supplement their incomes or lower costs, they can’t continue to operate in this fashion.

      This also ties in with your argument against labels becoming managers. Essentially, you describe the manager’s duty in this case as being an arbitrator of sorts between band and label. This is another part of the “adapt or be left behind” argument. Labels and bands will have to understand that they depend on each other to make money. What’s good for the band is good for the label and vice versa. It’s going to take better cooperation between both to change the current relationship to where an independent manager is not needed. Most metal bands, from what I’ve seen, are already taking the first step by becoming more business savvy by necessity. This trend will continue, and it’s inevitable that roles will change further.

      4. Dealing with piracy: While many I’m sure will say that nothing can be done to deter it, I beg to differ. Things can be done, but I wouldn’t expect the law to step in and do it. Again, like so many other new functions these days, it’s really on the labels to be proactive about it.

      There are numerous companies that can be contracted out to actively search out and remove copyrighted material. I was referred to http://takedownpiracy.com/ by a radio personality that I am a fan of through his endorsement. It seems to be working for him, as I couldn’t find any of his recorded material on the internet except through his own website. With music labels obviously having much larger libraries to deal with, it may prove more cost effective to employ someone specifically to do the same task. I can’t say for sure that it would work, but it couldn’t hurt to invest some time looking into it.

      The bottom line is that things have changed, and will continue to change. Those that change with the times will survive, and perhaps even prosper. Those that are unwilling to do so won’t be in the business much longer.

      • disagree

        If you actually read Vince’s statement about the situation you would see that he calls them “suits” right at the beginning, making your response seem a little less credible, if your really gonna nit-pic like that but not be thorough yourself…

        • Beauzaque

          Are you referring to this?: “Here is a reply from the suits at Century Media on the genius post from Vince at Metal Sucks on why we should be giving away our artist’s music for free on Spotify.”

          If you could follow the formatting, you’d understand that it was the opening line of the e-mail he received from CM. In fact, they did it twice in the e-mail, if you really want to nit-pick, but I don’t. If that’s the purpose that YOU understood my rebuttal of Mike B to have, then you entirely missed the point.

          He was the only person in the article, or even in the comments section, who took the term “suit” as derogatory and lashed out at Vince over it at. There is a reason nobody else did. Because it isn’t derogatory. It’s a common term used to refer to someone in an executive role at a business, which is why CM had no issues identifying themselves as such. To be fair, Vince did use it in his previous article, but that is not the issue.

          The point of what I said on the matter is that Mike B made himself look less professional by opening his statement with an insult. This is plain as day. If you missed that, then I suspect that you are also an angry label rep with a chip on his/her shoulder, and you aren’t thinking clearly because you’re upset. The fact that you only replied to one thing I said, which you misunderstood at that, leads me to believe that you can’t refute anything else I’ve said.

          • Disagree

            I like how you say you dont want to nit-pick as you sit there and nit-pick.
            Futhermore, jesus christ, do you not know how to read. I said if you read Vince’s statement. Not his rebuttal, his statement, the first thing he wrote regarding this thing with CM and Spotify… Go ahead, I’ll wait for you…you see it now, good.

          • Disagree

            It’s cute how you can pick and choose who can understand the deep and philosophical understanding of “you” and how you say you dont want to nit-pick and then continue to do just that.
             I also like how you assume I must be someone who works at a label and that I am upset. Neither is true, I was simply pointing out a little hipocrisy on your part, nothing more. Sorry you got all butt hurt over it.

    • Finally

      Finally a post on here that makes sense. I never had much respect for this blog to begin with since they are for the most part huge dickheads with shitty taste in music but after this idiot response to CM I most likely will never return to this site, especially after the bragging about 30k views a day which is what lures the RECORD LABELS to pay to put advertisements on their page in the first place. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you!

      The very fact that they are claiming they get 50 plus full album submissions from bands recording their albums with fucking garage band and claiming they sound as good as a record that costs 10-30k to produce is just insanity. If every album starts sounding like Animals As Leaders, Cloudkicker, Periphery (IE fake shitty programmed drums and the same pod or direct tones every lame demo quality shit band is using) then I will quit listening to any modern music period.

      Post those 50+ albums a day that sound soooo good made with garage band because I am just dying to hear them let me tell ya!

      • See Ya!!!

        Concern troll is concerned.

        Don’t let the door hit you on the ass on the way out!!

      • James Murphy

        “Finally” gets it.., thank you for crystalizing some of the thoughts that i failed to get out clearly before.

    • James Murphy

      cheers Michael, very well spoken…. Beauzaque seems to be hung up on “pie-in-the-sky” platitudes like, “change with the times to survive/prosper”, and reveals by his other statements that he has very little idea of the actual dynamics of promoting a band. These types are completely stuck in a worse rut than they claim the music industry is: finding anything they can say to justify their sense of entitlement, and sporting a penchant for pollyanna, utopian ideals with no regard to real-world application or consequences.

      nor do any of these detractors seem to understand that artists sign deals because they want, and have decided they need, the help and infrastructure their labels provide, in order to get their bands to the next level that they realize they can’t get to on their own.

      look people… and for the third time so far in this thread… if you want free music, that’s been recorded in a way that makes sense for music given away for free (DIY recording), then there is an endless supply of perfectly legal content out there for you (just go back to myspace to find them)…. but no, no one wants any of it really, do they….. no, over and over again people gravitate to music that’s being promoted, and which has been financed… So if you guys are really so keen that a “new” model should suddenly spring forth that provides free content, then why haven’t you taken advantage of the fact that there’s been music of this description available for several years, and shunned the label-financed music altogether… eh? how come?

      it’s because you actually LIKE the quality, and filter you get via label rosters… of course there are some poor quality releases on labels, but that’s mostly a sign of the times… budgets are getting smaller thanks to piracy…. and some artists just suck, despite being on a label.. but by and large people gravitate to signed bands for their downloading and listening activity… this should be a clue.

      i’ll bet none of these guys have visited myspace any more recently than i have, lol…. and the reasons are obvious… crappy interface, and the utterly unfiltered DELUGE of DIY bands that no one even wanted to get updates (SPAM) from anymore, much less listen to. And before anyone tries to mention the 2 or 3 unsigned bands they follow, we are talking SCALE here… yes everyone likes a couple unknown bands, but still 95% of most people’s listening is to label releases.

      So there is a striking disparity between what the “free music” proponents SAY they want, and what they actually do… because the “model” they are advocating has been with us for several years…. and no one cares to pay attention to those bands, which is why as soon as any of them possibly can, they sign to labels… for the promotion, and financing, and the infrastructure in general.

      teach the music industry a lesson if you truly have the strength of your stated convictions… go listen strictly to bands that record themselves and give away their music for free…. and as soon as the majority of your listening habits are bands that stem from that “model”, you may actually have a point…. but until then, understand that where you would have music go has already been with us for several years now, on a huge scale…. and you are mostly ignoring it.

      • http://www.dustypeterson.net Dusty

        Obviously people are happy to support free music, though, James. They are the ones getting the free shit all day! And anyone that injects logic and brings up the business aspect is either going to be a “greedy suit” or “living in the past”.

        I’m an artist myself (not a musician), but I worry about this stuff too. I worry about the day when no one wants album covers/layouts anymore because it’s flatout not in the budget to do them!

        As it is, I get inquiries from unsigned bands all the time and many of them are very serious and have saved their pennies and want to buy a professional album cover. But A LOT of them are taken aback when I tell them my (industry standard!) rates because they don’t have label support and the thought of paying more than $100.00 for package artwork just doesn’t make sense to them.

        So this type of stuff is near and dear to me as well. It would really depress me if there was a day in music where there was shitty DIY music, with no artwork accompanying anything, and just lists of music on spreadsheet-style interfaces and no thumbnails other than the bandlogo (if that!).

        It’s heading in that direction.
        I “get it” why people want their free shit. Why wouldn’t I? But I know I am not the only one that still wants to see an “ALBUM” be an “ALBUM”. And it costs money to make those.

        The thing that I think a lot of people forget is that EVERYONE in the metal industry is passionate about metal. Even the “suits”. Do you think they’d put up with all of this shit if they weren’t? No one is a “sell out” for wanting to earn a living at what they love. But passion only takes you so far and then you want to eat for the week.

        I’ve seen bands living off of microwave meals pretty much constantly. And these are popular bands, too! Ones with plenty of “hits” and “likes” and “follows” etc etc. But that show rolls around and these dedicated fans find some way to get on a guest list, would rather buy another bag of weed than a shirt, and all of that talk about supporting shows goes right out the window (that’s not EVERYONE of course, but I’m using hyperbole to show my point).

        The point is…which I REALLY hope no one can argue against….is that bands DO need money. Labels (imagine that) DO need money. Some how some way. If they don’t have money, they stop. And you get the DIY myspace bands that James is talking about.

        Both sides have good points, and adapting may be in order…but the fact remains people need to spend some money for the sake of METAL.

      • Krang10

        Hey James guess what? Don’t care…London is burning down, America is fucked, the middle east will eventually blow up, and the recording industry is screwed. Am I missing anything?

        You may have noticed that quite a few other industries and ways of life that rose to prominence here in America during the 20th century are no longer doing so hot. It was never going to last. Way too many people got rich off of music, most of them who weren’t even playing it, that isn’t supposed to happen. I can only pray that we have less music in the future because of this, there is way too fucking much of it anyway. Survival of the fittest, some of the actual “good” bands will live to fight another day, some won’t, that was going to happen anyway. Many “shitty” bands will get lucky and survive off the stupidity of the majority of people, that was also going to happen anyway.

        Jump on board with the end of the world, do something about it besides whine on here or shut the fuck up.

        • James Murphy

          really? i’m the one whining? Try re-reading your comment. i didn’t complain about anything, i merely stated perspectives…. your whole comment is one giant complaint.

          and yet you also seem to somehow feel that you’re “doing something about it”, whatever “it” is.

          Magic.

          • Krang10

            Yes James Murphy, you are the one whining, not just in that comment but in the other 40 you have posted, I’ve read em all. An employee of Goldman Sach’s who is sad because his portfolio doesn’t look as good as it used to. As other comments have stated, this industry is just like a lot of others. Poor decisions and greed in the past have led up to this point.

            Of course you make some valid points. I’m not complaining about anything, just very broadly stating that shit is fucked up and isn’t getting better and I honestly couldn’t care less. In no way do I imply that I am doing anything about anything, I’m not, nor do I want to.

            I am a very pro-active music listener/fan. Sure, I download music, but I also go to concerts, If a band is at the show that I have downloaded their CD, I talk to them if I can, tell them so (they don’t care), and if there isn’t any merch I like I throw em $5 anyway. I just went to Warped Tour over the weekend (free ticket whoohoo!) Rocked out and danced my ass off to Acacia Strain, Moving Mountains, and Big Chocolate, also gave em each $5 bucks at their tents because I did download their stuff.

            I don’t need a fucking label of any kind to filter out “good/bad” music, I’ve got ears and I also take the insane amount of time it takes to ATTEMPT to listen to all the bands/DJ’s I can. If they happen to be on a label? Cool, some other people have the same taste as I do, buying a CD for $10 bucks doesn’t do much for me or for them.

            I get that you are saying the same things over and over again, and I’m not saying anyone needs to adapt or evolve, just accept.

            BTW…I really like your band, and if this is in fact that person, you also canceled your concert in my city that I paid $30 for, so there, I tried.

          • Douchenozzle

            $5 bucks per band for all you stole from those artists! Gee, what a stand-up guy you are!

          • Douchenozzle

            $5 bucks per band for all you stole from those artists! Gee, what a stand-up guy you are!

      • Beauzaque

        Whoa, why are you taking a shot at me? Can you not make a solid argument for your viewpoint without prefacing it with an insult? You immediately give yourself away as writing out of anger. You also infer that I feel I’m entitled to free music, even though I specifically stated that I’m not pro-piracy. It’s your decision if you want to have a discussion or a pissing contest. I’m going with the former.

        You’re correct that label promotion is still the number one way that we discover bands these days, but it is not the only way, and other grassroots methods are gaining popularity. It’s a sign of the change that is happening that Metalsucks promotes multiple unsigned bands every week, or that I can go to local and/or indy shows and find the club packed. You’d be correct in saying I haven’t used Myspace in ages, but Bandcamp has come along to replace that and improve upon it. There’s also a wealth of information on Twitter if you know how to look for it. Being a metal fan, I’ve had to actively seek out new music for years. It’s not really a new thing.

        Myself, I like paying for music. I like being one of only a few thousand people to be monetarily supporting a band through CD sales. I think it’s shameful that bands I think are great sell so few, but I can understand that the medium is not the be-all end-all that it once was. It’s become something for the more serious fan like myself, and even I’m more likely to pick up a shirt at a show than a CD I don’t have yet. Downloading is a good vetting process, though. Hell, they could stop making physical media altogether and people like me would still find ways to monetarily support bands we enjoy.

        I’m not going to lie. There are even shittier times ahead for everyone in the music industry, especially independent metal labels and bands which don’t have a large market to begin with. The situation is going to get worse before it gets better, and it’s probably never going to be as good as it used to be. That being said, as with any other industry, this will be an impetus for change. It is going to get smaller, though. Some labels are going to go under, and guys like Dusty likely won’t be able to count on album art as the source of income it once was. I think that sucks, but there’s no avoiding it.

        Some will continue though. The crafty and creative ones will. Let’s look at what happened a few years ago with the American auto industry, which was on the verge of a catastrophic collapse. GM and Chrysler received huge government bailouts. Ford, however, had already begun to adjust their business as they saw what was coming, and got by without. The Fords of the music industry are going to survive in some capacity. They are likely not the ones who are spending their time on here flinging insults and getting upset, but are rather planning ahead and researching new revenue streams all the time.

        As I’ve said, I don’t believe Spotify is charging enough for their service, and can almost guarantee that it will go up, and maybe CM’s just holding out for a better deal or pursuing their own service. Perhaps the service will change, where customers can buy subscriptions to individual labels, much like with premium channels on TV. I certainly don’t know what’s going to work, which is probably why I’m just a fan and make my living elsewhere.

        Anyways though, times are tough. No denying it. But this is precisely the climate that leads to innovation, because it is a necessity.

  • Vixen

    Interesting discussion, though it’s clear that a lot of people have a flawed understanding of the mechanisms of the music industry.

    I’d really like Vince to respond to James Murphy and Michael B, as both are industry insiders bringing up very valid points. Unless I’m mistaken, Season of mist are represented on Spotify though?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Berberian/601567076 Michael Berberian

    Only because I recently talked with CM boss (at Wacken). we might do the same thing. Oliver (CM boss) was all pumped out about them, in my view of things they’re not the main enemy. Ask me if I wanna join a class action lawsuit vs Rapidshare or Blogspot, fine.
    Spotify : didn’t go onto my radar yet until Oliver raised to me some valid points. So we just might, as well, dunno. I think on the spotify issue I think I just didn’t realize. We’re so used to get anally raped left and right that at some points it just stopped hurting, I guess.

    • Bad Move Michael

      Good luck with that one. There goes any chance for me about giving two shits about any SOM artists. Guess there’s always torrents.

  • Beauzaque

    I think it’s very telling that as you read further into the CM e-mail, the writer changes from railing against Vince and Spotify, to railing against piracy. It makes it very clear what they really think of that type of service.

    It was also pretty surprising at how the e-mail was written. If it really did come from one of the higher ups, or even the head of the label, then I’d be seriously worried about the current situation at that label. Judging by it’s unprofessional tone and numerous insults, they are either in serious dire financial straits at this very moment, or they have someone in a leadership role that perhaps shouldn’t be there.

    Also of note, directly related to this whole matter, I follow Devin Townsend on twitter and he was recently informed by a follower that all of his solo and SYL library had been removed from Spotify, as InsideOut distributes his music in America.

    His response?

    “Ugh… I personally fully back Spotify. All music should be available as far as I’m concerned. Lots of arm wrestling lately :/”

    There’s a guy who understands the situation, and by his own admission is lucky enough to make a comfortable living doing what he loves in the current industry climate. I think we’ll find that by and large, the bands are more accepting of the way things are progressing. One way or another, labels are going to have to catch up to them.

  • Lee

    I don’t know why CM bothered responding to your childish and illiterate post. Haters gonna hate, Fuck Metal Sucks.

    • Beauzaque

      The ironing is delicious.

  • Minimalist

    I love how everyone acts like Spotify is the only streaming music service out there. Century Media’s stuff is on other ones, even if they aren’t that great to begin with. Spotify has a lot of ads in the free version.

    Anyway, in regards to business models and paying for services, nothing beats downloading. Music is free, I can generally get what I want as soon as I want it, and there are no fucking ads to have to listen to or limited numbers of skips. I get it fast and I have it once its downloaded.

    I personally steal stuff because I cannot afford it and I am an asshole who doesn’t care what others think. I don’t feel entitled, I just need shit to listen to. So nobody makes a damn dime off of me. If I didn’t listen to said music I downloaded, or piracy was eliminated, they wouldn’t make shit off of me either. So nobody has lost or gained anything by me alone. Dead Horse, I know.

    Point is through all this bitching, is that people do what works for them even at the expense or wellfare of others, doesn’t mean its right or wrong, but it is done. Labels do what they need to do, bands do what they need to do, and fans and assholes like me do what they need to do. And somehow, its working for the time being.

    So in other words, I know this post is tl;dr, take something away, and people will still find it through other means. Century Media has just given people 1 less option to do so.

    • CrownofWorms

      I’m not advocate of downloading like you, but this +1

  • paganheart

    What’s happening in the music industry is a microcosm of what is happening to society at large right now: the hollowing out of the middle class. Economic and societal forces (too complex to go into here) are increasingly turning us into a world where a handful of people have so much money that they can buy 10 houses and own several pairs of $500 Prada shoes, while the rest of us are wage slaves in constant economic insecurity, shopping at Wal-Mart and struggling from paycheck to paycheck. The music industry is increasingly becoming a world where a small handful of “artists” (Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber, Katy Perry) basically shit money, while everyone else is left to tour around the country in beat-up vans, playing 500-seat clubs and eating ramen for dinner.

    What’s the answer: I don’t fucking know. What I do know is that such is the way of the world. Change is constant, and those who do not accept change are left behind. Those that know they are being left behind are often the most in denial and lash out like an animal does when it’s mortally wounded.

    Change is the only reality. Adapt or die.

  • Dan

    Dear Century Media,

    Netflix costs $7.99/month.
    Movies cost MILLIONS of dollars to make, yet are available on-demand via Netflix.

    Get over yourself.

    • James Murphy

      for a subscription fee, and not every movie is on there, not by a longshot… no one has to pay for spotify if they don’t want to, and most don’t want to.. they use it free… and you stand a far better chance of finding 10 albums you want to hear in a row on spotify than you do 10 movies in a row on Netflix… and the compensation is obviously more favorable for movies on Netflix than for music on Spotify.

      there are also ‘economics of scale’ here to be considered, a basic economic tenet.

      get real with yourself. Bº)

    • Bard

      Pretty much fucking this. I’m tired of the music industry thinking they’re so fucking special.

      Video Games also take substantially more to make than an album and there’s Good Ole Games, OnLive, D2D, etc. Pirating with video games is also a hot topic what with Digital Rights Management and all that but unlike the music industry the video game industry is actively seeking a solution.

      Just because everyone in the music industry has their head so far up their proverbial ass they would rather keep the old ways and make us average douche bags fill their pockets the easy way doesn’t mean that we have to put up with it.

    • Alex

      Movies are first released in theaters though, where they get support from movie loving consumers.

      Movies are also generally only consumed once. That’s why it doesn’t make sense to preview the entire movie before getting support for it.

      Albums on the other hand get several spins throughout one’s lifetime, and become such an integral part of one’s life eventually. It makes sense to preview it, to evaluate it’s potential enjoyment value. It doesn’t make sense, however, to expect quality albums if the artists aren’t getting paid. Because Spotify doesn’t pay artists, it pays the labels. Furthermore, how easy do you think it would be for an artist to audit Spotify’s databases? Let’s not kid ourselves.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Martha-Everett/516171012 Martha Everett

    I’m on the fence with this one. I totally agree that the industry needs to re-evaluate revenue streams, but on the other hand I don’t agree that it’s just the consumer that sets value. To a certain extent Spotify *does* devalue music because people will go for the cheapest option. I’m much more in favour of sites like Bandcamp where artists can suggest how much you pay – I tend to find myself paying what they suggest & I think it’s normally a fair price, but then people don’t *have* to pay so that sorts out the exposure issue as well. They also give artists a much fairer cut of the profit.

    Personally I think if CM disagree with how Spotify does business then I applaud them for not letting themselves be held to ransom. It doesn’t mean they have to rule out all forms of change.

    I think the comment about pulling out leading to more illegal downloads is a fair one though. They need to offer fans a viable alternative.

  • Jewcifer

    I was just skimming back over the article and the comments, when, all of a sudden, it hit me…I don’t give a shit or have an opinion about any of this! And if I had to wager my left asscheek, I’d say most of you don’t give 2 shits either – but hey, at least you’re making a difference in how the music industry works by posting comments!

  • Peachy

    I totally see where CM is coming from! If they put their bands on Spotify, their music will get out to those goddamn “music lovers” for less money, the listeners will provide word-of-mouth/facebook/etc promotion, they will go to see the bands live, the bands will sell merch and make tour money, and the label will lose money. After all, when a band signs with a label, they pretty much sign up for a loan, and if the label doesn’t make much money off of the recorded albums, then the hardworking TALENT will make the majority of profits… and CM can’t stand for that!

    And Vince… I’ve been saying for years that labels should INVEST in talent and become managment labels. You make lots of valid points, and I applaud. Well played, sir.

  • Chainsword

    The fans of “Whatever’s on the radio” is on it’s way out. Consumers can stream higher quality music, that is cheaper to produce, at will. The act of distribution no longer takes a limousine. The vehicle for a unsigned band to get their music to the average consumer now comes in an inline 4. Signed and Unsigned bands now fight for listeners on the same level. Distribution of music is no longer a viable means for promotion or income, regardless of group talent or distribution medium.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Quentin-Wilkins/100001046551530 Quentin Wilkins

    I let a friend listen to two albums on Spotify last night. He’s a by-the-book CD buyer and, after hearing how awesome the albums were, he ordered and PAID for them.

  • Ali Cara

    What makes me laugh is that Spotify had been actively running for about 3 years now give or take with its original origins back in Europe. You mean to tell me that CM Germany, NB Germany and the Century Family’s imprint labels overseas are getting pissed and want to pull out NOW? This JUST became an issue for them? Gimme a break. 

  • Ali Cara

    What makes me laugh is that Spotify had been actively running for about 3 years now give or take with its original origins back in Europe. You mean to tell me that CM Germany, NB Germany and the Century Family’s imprint labels overseas are getting pissed and want to pull out NOW? This JUST became an issue for them? Gimme a break. 

  • Death metal

    (Note: This was written when every comment to this post had dissappeared,
    and is actually a comment to the “what I wrote yesterday” post,
    but it’s still the pure truth, so I’ll post it here).

    You might not advocate stealing. But you advocate accepting and a adapting to
    a new situation created solely by thieves. You even scold anyone who will not
    let their actions be dictated by these thieves.

    No one has gone to Spotify with a smile on their face and no one would have gone there
    if it was not for theft. You mention this yourself -
    “(by the way: by pulling out of Spotify you are actually incentivizing people to steal!)”
    Basically everybody on spotify is there with a gun at their heads, and though
    it’s not spotify themselves holding the gun, the threat of theft
    is still not a legitimate market perimeter, that one must accept.

    That’s why your arts and crafts example is wrong. The relevant one would be:
    A craftsman creates a project and wants to sell it for 10$. What you calll a
    fan/buyer/consumer (and I call a thief) comes by and says that he wants the
    project for 0$. The seller doesn’t agree so they could go each their own way
    and all would be fair and square. No one would have anything so put on that.
    However the “buyer” doesn’t just leave. He steals the project.
    Furthermore this happens more and more and in the end someone offers the craftsman
    1 cent for his projects, and if he doesn’t accept, all the people around him,
    who should be backing up his right to be the master of his own products, tell
    him to go for it and get with the new market, or he’s an idiot.

    Remember that 90% of Spotifys users are free users and do not even want to
    pay that 1 dollar a month for music if they can get it free. Very few will
    pay for something they can simply steal – or thrugh theft force the creators
    to give away.

    You call yourself liberal. But this must have nothing to do with classical
    liberalism, where one of the most central point of this is that each man owns
    the fruit of his own labour.

    This means that the seller may set any price he damn well chooses.
    If the buyer doesn’t agree, he can refuse to buy. That is totally fair
    and in the spirit of liberalism. However the “buyer” cannot choose to steal
    if he doesn’t agree with the price. That is not a legitimate market factor,
    and I don’t know of any ideology idiotic enough to defend such a view.

    “Sell your product dirt cheap or people won’t buy it” and “sell your product
    dirt cheap or people will steal it” are night and day. One is legitimate and fair
    the other is, if not advocating crime, then accepting it and urging others to do the same.
    The first is in tune with liberalism the second is an absurd parody of anarchy or something.

    Everyone has the right to sell and market their product in the way they want.
    And they never entitle theft by doing it. Especially in the face of crime it is
    commendable to fight, and not just “go with the flow”. The same I would say of
    for example rising dictatorships.
    In even the odds are seeminglingly impossible – Fight the fuckers!

    I really hope that labels will go more into the business of sueing
    the thieves and give them what’s coming to them. There must be money
    to get there, and if the labels and bands start getting their rightful money again,
    Spotify will die.

    I hail those who still fight for their right and do no bow to crime, no matter
    how bad the odds may be.
    I spit on the spineless who scold others for not all having their heads bowed.

    • Al

      “No one has gone to Spotify with a smile on their face and no one would have gone there if it was not for theft.”
      So, wait, according to that logic, paying for music is stealing it? What are you smoking?
      Being not the most dedicated listeners, me and my wife used to buy less than 100€ worth of albums a year. Now we pay gladly 240€/year in total for our spotify accounts (and still buy albums of bands we’re really into). That, I would consider a net benefit to the industry. The amount we listen to music is pretty much the same and variety isn’t that much greater either, especially since most of what we listen to is what we used to own already.The money we pay, we pay for the convenience of not having to deal with CD’s or iTunes. The music is there, when we want it and where we want it. Now that CM has left spotify, our playlists have become shorter, but I don’t concider that being worth the effort of ripping the same songs from our CD’s and adding to every single device we use music on (that would be 7, I believe). In our case, CM will lose a tiny bit of revenue every year, for which it will gain nothing in return. It is their decision, though, so even if I’m saddened by it, I do respect it.The attitude that all users are all thieves by default (e.g. DRM in software/games/movies, ridiculous lawsuits, draconic “licensing” deals instead of transferring ownership on sale), is exactly what makes me want to avoid some companies altogether, though. I haven’t seen any studies of piracy significantly affecting sales. Entertainment industries are doing better than they ever have done before. There seems to be something else amiss and piracy is just the simple scapegoat for people to wave their crusade banners at, without actually bothering to investigate complex relationships between customers, companies and artists.The main problem with spotify, I believe, is the total lack of transparency. Users don’t see how much they’re contributing to whom they listen to. Record labels and artists apparently don’t see the source of their revenue from spotify, either (how much of the income comes from user-paid and ad-supported listens). Different labels seem to be getting different kind of deals and we have little idea on the percentage spotify is taking to themselves. Also, labels have apparently no option to only make their music available either to ad-supported or user-paid accounts – it’s an all-or-nothing deal.

      P.S. That version of craftsman analogy doesn’t work, either. Seeing the item craftsman made or blueprints for it and building it yourself, might be closer to reality. Ultimately, it’s almost always apples and oranges with analogies, though. :)

      • Al

        Hmm… apparently most of the newlines were dropped by the submit form. My apologies for that.

  • http://twitter.com/HALman1973 HALman

    Why are Century media artists still available to stream on Sony’s Qriocity Music Unlimited service? I thought streaming for £10 a month was killing music?  Maybe someone from Century would like to comment on this glaring hypocrisy? – or are you just scared of big, bad Sony?

  • http://twitter.com/HALman1973 HALman

    Why are Century media artists still available to stream on Sony’s Qriocity Music Unlimited service? I thought streaming for £10 a month was killing music?  Maybe someone from Century would like to comment on this glaring hypocrisy? – or are you just scared of big, bad Sony?

  • http://twitter.com/HALman1973 HALman

    Why are Century media artists still available to stream on Sony’s Qriocity Music Unlimited service? I thought streaming for £10 a month was killing music?  Maybe someone from Century would like to comment on this glaring hypocrisy? – or are you just scared of big, bad Sony?