THE HARD R: GOD FORBID’S DALLAS COYLE BLOGS ABOUT THE MEANING OF “METALCORE”

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008 at 1:41pm by

Dallas CoyleMetal-Core (R.I.P) 2001 – 2008

Metalcore: Corn Flakes or Shoprite Corn Flakes?

It is over! The revolution is over!

I hate the term Metal-Core with a passion. I hate it when people say we helped create a genre of music that has an expiration date. Are we responsible for mathcore too? Or is that The Dillinger Escape Plan’s fault? I hope you’re following me. Another stupid statement: We’re starting a movement of black metal heads. No. Being black in a metal band was never weird for us, until we played Kansas for the first time. New Jersey is the shit!

I’m sick of people marginalizing every thing. When we first started back in 1996 and when we became GF in 98 this labeling BS wasn’t very important to us. We just thought we were a metal band. And guess what? We still think we’re a metal band. When I look at our coverage on YouTube for our videos there are many things that make me laugh. Yes, of course I look at what you people are saying! The whole ‘are they metal or metalcore?’ question takes the short bus cake.

When I go to the supermarket I like to buy Nathan’s or Sabrett hot dogs. Not the supermarket’s brand of hot dogs. I would like to hope that I have enough money to buy the higher quality product. Hence Metal to Metal-Core. Metal-Core to me is the poor mans choice for heavy, aggressive music.

Let’s bring up the ‘breakdown’. Most like to say metalcore is metal and hardcore put together but it’s more about the ‘breakdown’ that gets real metal, like God Forbid, labeled with this bullshit term. If that’s the case, let’s go back in time to Sepultura’s Chaos AD which has breakdowns galore. Is that then the first Metal-Core record? Everyone says of course not. I say ‘fuck you’ ’cause if we’re metalcore then Sepultura’s Chaos AD is too. For the record, Chaos AD is metal as fuck.

One of the ideologies that I live by is: Everything relates to everything. Metaphors are infinite. The Metal to Metal-Core debate relates to everything in art; torture porn horror versus horror, cheap tricks versus real strategy, etc. Where’s the beef?

Obviously Metal-Core has none. I don’t fault the supporters who describe us as Metal-Core but I do fault their support of ‘journalists’ to try and reinvent the wheel that wasn’t broken in the first place. God Forbid isn’t doing anything but trying to make good metal for true metal heads. We’re not reinventing the wheel and we’re not responsible for that dump in the pants genre called Metal-Core. Can we please move on from re-labeling music that already has a label?

Is the label of Metal-Core supposed to guarantee some new form of ‘awesome’ metal?

I can think of one quote: ‘Why do they put a guarantee on the box? Because they know all they sold ya was a guaranteed piece of shit.’

Go metal. Goodbye and good riddance Metal-Core!

  • Sammy

    The fight for sub-genre labeling is, at best, stupid and generally a big “who cares?”. Honestly, this endless need to define music by a one or two-named label is quite silly. Metallica’s Kill ‘Em All has two minute intros that could be called “breakdowns with leads”. Are they the predecessors of “metal-core”? Well, in a word, yes. They were the precursor to a lot of aggressive metal. Everything is derivative, yet still ever-changing.

    God Forbid is metal. As of for the skin color or heredity of the band’s members, if you ask the question, start looking for the swastika to wipe off your forehead.

  • Fink

    In my mind, metalcore is just a subgenre. If you play metalcore, you play metal, as metalcore is merely a kind of metal. With all the communication possible through the Internet, people talk about everything with everyone more than ever before. And communicating, we need to come up with terms to categorize our thoughts so that we convey our meaning to others. These “subgenres” like metalcore are merely a descriptive tool to allow us to talk about what we’re hearing.

    Also, I’ve said this before, but I’ll say it again: it really bothers me that metalcore as a whole has become no more than a “dump in the pants” genre simply because it’s oversaturated with copycats and stale, formulaic, boring bands. The implication that a band is shitty because they play metalcore is absurd. It’s the approach to the music, the total lack of ingenuity and inspiration that makes a band suck, not the genre of music they play. Every genre has good and bad artists; metalcore just happens to have a lot more bad than good.

    Don’t shit on metalcore – shit on the bands that are bringing it down.

  • Fink

    Also, I agree with Sammy. The whole sub-sub-sub-genre thing is ridiculous. I know I said we use these labels as ways of describing what we’re hearing, but in doing so we create categories and oversimplify things. For the most part, these labels are all bullshit.

  • Seth

    The alignment of the term “metalcore” with “shitty band” seems to be due to the specificity of the term, mixed with the short term popularity of many of the bands who play that style, and thus the lack of ingenuity in the genre, and the general cash grab that has resulted. Metal and hardcore are both cool genres, so logically the fusion of the two would be cool as well. Not so says the gipper. The term metal can refer to such a wide variety of subgenres that it can never be uncool (well, except in the late 80s through the grunge era when the term was like a disease). In any case, metalcore refers to such a specific style that it is bound to suffer from copy band after copy band who add little to the musical landscape.

    Thrash is next people–mark my words. The thrash revival is real, and all the bands are just rehashing metallica and adding 100% screaming vox. I like metalcore, I like thrash, but if bands refuse to extrapolate new sounds, its all stale.

  • vitruvianApe

    if metal-core is dead, can we start listening to nu-metal-core now? I sure do miss primer 55 :(

  • Dallas

    nu-metal-core is a reality already. Five Finger Death Punch is a good example.

  • PinealGlandOptics

    “Go metal. Goodbye and good riddance Metal-Core!”

    So you’re criticizing all the metalcore bands you’ve toured with? (Chimaira, Killswitch Engage, Shadows Fall, Darkest Hour, Unearth etc…)

    There is good and bad in every genre. Metalcore has been played out, thanks to the hundreds of inferior copycat bands (and may I add labels) looking for the next big thing. But isn’t it the same for every sub-genre of metal? Just look at all the crappy “deathcore” bands popping up all over the place. Once again, there are some quality deathcore bands, but the majority sound alike with little to no substance. Same with this new wave of thrash.

  • Pingback: SMNnews.com | God Forbid - Try To Convince People They're Not Metalcore

  • Dran

    Lole, if you hate metalcore so much, why do you continue to write and play it?

  • DJ

    God Forbid used to be one of the best metal bands out there, until Gone Forever came out. Then they became one of the worst metal-core bands out there. If Dallas needs any “proof”, just listen to the guitar solo to breakdown ration from Reject the Sickness to any of their new discs. I’d love to go see God Forbid live again, but all they play is new songs and never play old stuff. I wish they could just tour on their first 3 discs.

  • Dallas

    Here we go. The typical debate about old stuff vs new stuff. Our first three albums are reject the sickness, determination, gone forever. We achieved great success on Gone Forever during ozzfest. Where was everyone when we were touring on those earlier ‘amazing’ albums? We did a headlining tour on Determination with Bleeding Through and Avenged Sevenfold in 2001. We played in front of less people than bleeding through every night. This was the beginning of the wave. The tour was so bad for us we almost quit. But, metal-core still didn’t exist as a label at that point. So no, I don’t think Chimaira, Shadows Fall, KsE, Darkest Hour or Unearth are metalcore. They are metal coming out of the hardcore scene. There’s a big difference. I’d imagine a lot of you were a little young when we did our first headlining tour but I’d say that our newer material is better written, more focused and over all more skilled and that is why it has done well for the band. Constitution Of Treason is far from metal-core and, so is most of our other stuff. I’d like to know where people think metalcore started? I’ll go out on a limb and say my knowledge on this is a little deeper but I’d like to hear what everyone thinks created the shit storm.

  • Dallas

    Another strong point on the subject is geographics. If our band were from Kansas and not New Jersey we would have been considered metal not metal-core. New Jersey is known for it’s hardcore scene and we’ve always been the metal band in that scene. Not the metalcore band in that scene. New Jersey doesn’t have a strong metal scene. As far as I can tell in New Jersey for metal, there’s us, symphony x, ripping corpse.

    Lamb Of God are our peers and we toured with them through the branding of metalcore and they weren’t labeled metal core. Could it be because they are from VA and not the northeast?

    They have breakdowns, staccato riffs, etc.

    If you go to a god forbid show, it’s metal heads not scene heads. You’ll more likely see moshing and headbanging and not windmill kicks. What does that say for you?

  • Joe

    i think the reason why some people find the “metalcore” tag so apt is because it is readily apparent where these people were five years ago before the trend started to occur. if it sounds like these kids were listen to pop punk or some hardcore bands before deciding they weren’t scared of slayer (or their fans) anymore, they’re metalcore. just looking at these clowns you can tell they have never heard a carcass album outside of heartwork.

    i will give god forbid credit, you can hear the influence of true metal in their sound. they aren’t a scene band, in that i believe their appreciation for metal in it’s many varied forms is as legitimate as my own. metalcore bands make me wish i never heard metal at all, because their patchwork songwriting is clearly the result of tablature and mimicry. they just want to make a buck off it, which is completely reprehensible.

    you don’t need to look, act, or say anything particular to be metal. but sincerity, hard work, and respect for metal and it’s history are imperative to any musician in a metal band. simply put, don’t fuck with metalheads. they aren’t as submissive as your pitiful myspace horde.

    and so ends my treatise “on metal: or, i will gouge out your eyes with your makeup pencil you thirty year old manchild.”

  • Fink

    Honestly, if KSE and Unearth and the like are not metalcore, what the hell is? Hardcore-influenced metal, metal bands that came from the hardcore scene; that IS metalcore. Or at least it was, until the word was totally distorted and overused. Problem is, bands like KSE and Unearth are also great bands, so it’s somehow demeaning and improper to call them metalcore. That’s the fucking issue right there. Metalcore has become a dirty word in the metal scene, and really lost all of its original meaning. It’s used now as more of an insult than a description of the type of music the band is playing.

    And the fact that you see moshing and headbanging rather than windmill kicks at a show means nothing. You can windmill to metal; you can headbang to hardcore. The scene does not define the music, and bands should not be labeled based upon their scene, which is precisely what’s being done here.

  • Seth

    Dallas, why are you SO OPPOSED to being termed metalcore? Who fucking cares. I mean, there are a ton of great bands that are sometimes referred to as Metalcore. Any idiot worth their salt knows that sub-genre labels are just that, and the music speaks for itself. One thing you don’t seem to acknowledge in your most recent post is that metalcore is still metal–so what the fuck is the difference b/t metalcore and “metal coming out of the hardcore scene?” Unless you are going to deny any influence from hardcore vocals and riffing structure, than you have to admit that you are in fact, at least to some degree, metalcore. By denying any relationship to metalcore, you are in essence giving credence to those who use the term as an adjective for generic/crummy bands, as opposed to what it should be, a descriptive term for the fusion of hardcore elements to heavy metal. In essence, alot of bands utilize those elements in different ways, so that Chimaira, KSE, Unearth, Darkest Hour, etc are all metalcore, and at the sametime, they are all different, and all something else as well. Just admit that of all your ingredients, you are at least one parts metalcore.

  • Dallas

    Why are YOU so intent on calling those bands metalcore? When I heard alive or just breathing from KsE I thought it was metal. I had the luxury of hearing it before most people but i still didn’t believe that it was hardcore influenced. I just thought, ‘hey, this is metal!’

    It reminded me of pantera more than terror. It wasn’t until this worthless label became attached to it that I was like, well,’ I guess KsE isn’t as metal as LOG but…’

    I think most people forget what true HARDCORE actually is. If you think any of the bands you mentioned sound like Madball or Terror then you’re head must be checked. To tell you the truth, I think hardcore should be just as pissed as metal about this cheap label.

    I think Heavy Metal is more appropriate for the above mentioned bands because they are fucking HEAVY and still METAL.

  • Sammy

    Stupidest argument ever on this site. It’s like arguing whether the sky is colored sky blue or light blue. It’s just fucking blue. Either you like GF or you don’t. If you need to label, then do so, but don’t judge the music by some douchebag’s label. Keep in mind that in 1982 Def Leppard were considered metal because of the relative rock music available at the time. If you don’t like GF as much now because the breakdown to solo ratio is too high, then that’s okay, but to write a 5,000 diatribe trying to define EXACTLY what sub-minutae-genre they fall under is a waste of one’s typing skills.

  • Dallas

    my point exactly. Well said Sammy.

  • Fink

    @Dallas: In some ways you’re right. I think that bands like KSE could only be referred to as metalcore in the context of what has happened within the hardcore scene. A band like Hatebreed certainly does not fit with early hardcore, which sounded more like punk than anything released as a “hardcore” album these days. Perhaps it should have been bands like Hatebreed that were dubbed “metalcore.” For whatever reason, as far as I’ve heard, they’ve mostly still been associated with the term “hardcore.” And then bands like Killswitch came along and blended this new version of hardcore with metal. Hence, metalcore. And the reason to insist on calling it metalcore is that the term is meant to describe a mixture of hardcore and metal. My point ultimately is that the term carries connotations now, which are bullshit. We should just eliminate the term (and consequently its connotations) entirely and just describe music without labeling it. The problem I have with how you’ve approached this is that you still use the term in the same way as the people you are criticizing, in turn lending the term legitimacy. To say something to effect of “metalcore sucks” (a new rival website perhaps?) validates the term, implying that you know what metalcore actually is, that it has a legitimate definition, and thus reinforces the labeling and its connotations.

    @Sammy: I think you and I are mostly in agreement. You might have misunderstood what I was trying to say, I may have said it poorly…. either way, we shouldn’t try to label music so much. Labels are constrictive and influence the way people hear music, i.e. a band that plays a mixture of metal and hardcore might be referred to as “metalcore” and subsequently dismissed by a large population of listeners based on that label.

    Anyway… I also just wanted to say that it’s pretty awesome that we can actually have this conversation without it degrading into “metalcore is for fags gtfo” and general shit-slinging, as it would on some other sites I’ve been to.

  • Seth

    Dallas, my main point was that you shouldnt give a fuck if you are labelled because labels are meaningless. By denying the label you are giving the label more relevance than if you just ignored it and plugged on. Your blog about not being metalcore just makes the term metalcore all the more relevant and makes you sound like a whiner. I never even thought KSE was considered metalcore until I read this comments board above–I did just think of them as metal. When people ask me what a band sounds like, I say “i dunno, metal”, and then i go on to describe what it sounds like. That being said, I don’t have a problem with the term metalcore, as long as it is not used as an overgeneralization, as it often is.

    And yes, i am aware that the ‘core’ part of metalcore comes more from the Hatebreed school of hardcore than the madball school of hardcore. Maybe thats where this whole debate should really start –old school vs new school hardcore. HAHAH. MORE ARGUING! NOW!

  • MetalCoReBLOWS

    What the fuck is with this fink kid. He keeps posting and sayin the stupidest shit. What a metalcore lover. Metalcore IS for fags, gtfo. Get a life homo!

  • http://www.waytooloud.com Shirt Guy

    I remember back in 2002 and 2003, metalcore was becoming more popular and rising quickly from the underground. A lot of rising metalcore bands actually played as openers for death metal bands, and as far as a lot of people were concerned, it was heavy music with screaming, and no one really cared about short haircuts or pants size.

    I think what happened is that people saw something getting hot quickly, and it seemed to be the perfect replacement for nu-metal, and a lot of people started jumping on the bandwagon. Record labels abused this too, as there was a huge signing binge of melodic metalcore bands in 2004 (just look at the Metal Blade Roster).

    Some of the new bands of course are kids looking to ride on the coattails of the scene, and are looking to “hit it big”, which of course isn’t the spirit of metalcore at all. Actually, it still isn’t, since most of the “big” bands who’ve been around for awhile can only afford vans.

    The pre-2003 metalcore bands were just hardcore dudes who liked playing metal. At the time, the idea of anything metal or hardcore basically involved ruining your life and having your girlfriend dump you so you could tour around the country in a band screaming every day and selling just enough t-shirts to eat peanut butter or beef jerky for dinner. Actually, for most bands, that’s still everyday life…

    I think Tommy Roger’s put it best when he said that the term “metalcore” wasn’t about a certain scene or how you dress when it was first coined. Try to remember that he played in Prayer For Cleansing, considered one of the prototypical metalcore bands back in 1999, who broke up before anyone had an idea that it could be big.

    It’s too bad that some artists feel the need to come out with articles like this to bash the genre. What I think is sad is the way record labels, new bands, and even some fans treat the genre itself. I know the local bands I’ve dealt with see metalcore as a way to “make it big”, not knowing the reality of most touring bands.

    Most likely the same kind of people who would’ve been into starting a metalcore band before it got big as a means of creative outlet are looking somewhere else.

    Today, “metalcore” really doesn’t mean anything. It’s like “emo” or “nu-metal”, their no longer musical descriptions, but merely shallow insults that get slapped on just about anything as a negative description. It’s too bad really, especially since both metalcore and emo came from underground roots, never intending anything close to popularity or radio play.

    If you’re wondering who I am, I did the interview with Alex Webster from Cannibal Corpse about metalcore, and I did ask Tommy Rogers about Prayer For Cleansing when I interviewed Between The Buried And Me.

  • Fink

    Everything I was trying to say, and probably said better. Nice post.

  • Pingback: POLL: WHAT’S THE NEXT ANNOYING TREND IN METAL? | MetalSucks