LAMB OF GOD’S WRATH COULDA BEEN A CONTENDER

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009 at 12:17pm by

lamb of god - wrathWrath, Lamb of God’s highly anticipated new album, opens with a track entitled “The Passing,” which has to be one of the best soft intros ever not written by Metallica in the 80s, before exploding with a typically rockin’ riff on the first real song, “In Your Words.” It’s a rousing start, and one which might lead the listener to think that Wrath is gonna be another winner from one of the American New Wave’s most popular and widely adored bands.

And then something strange happens: you wait for a chorus that never really arrives.

In point of fact, “In Your Words” has a chorus – sort of – but it’s not really memorable. And while there’s certainly no rule that says all music must have a chorus, let’s be real – LoG aren’t some experimental metal band. There’s no indication that Wrath intends to be experimental; this is a band that is beholden to the verse-chorus-verse structure of pop songwriting, and there’s nothing wrong with that, except that song after song – “In Your Words,” “Grace,” “Fake Messiah,” etc. – all have weak or practically non-existent choruses. It makes the songs feel like a series of plateaus, a string of riffs and breakdowns in search of structure. Even songs that have bigger, more obvious choruses, like “Broken Hands,” just aren’t quite as infectious as the anthems of LoG’s past.

The bizarre approach to the songwriting on Wrath isn’t the only odd thing about this record. Sacrament announced lead guitarist Mark Morton as one of the premiere guitar heroes of his generation; the solos on that album were bluesy, soulful, and still somehow metal as fuck, as though Morton were channeling No More Tears-era Zakk Wylde – but there are very few solos on this album (and the ones that are there are pretty bare bones and not all that spectacular). What the fuck kind of decision was that? It’s like letting the world know that Kirk Hammet is an awesome guitar player, and then releasing a Metallica album with no guitar solos (oh wait).

I don’t mean to piss on LoG’s parade; I’m making it sound as though Wrath is some kind of calamity, which it’s not. For one thing, the band hasn’t lost their talent for writing monstrous riffs, which they provide here again and again, and drummer Chris Adler is still pretty much the shit. Bassist John Campbell seems to be way higher in the mix than he has in the past, too, and that’s a good thing; his parts add a lot of flavor to the proceedings. Sonically, new producer Josh Wilbur is mostly following the game plan of immediate predecessor Machine on Sacrament, although this album is marginally less slick; and while Randy Blythe’s lyrics are, at this point, both pretty much predictable and cliché, his delivery is powerful enough to make it all work. The lines “Black liquid assets/Fuck the mujahideen/Paint their picket fences red/With the American dream” may be kinda silly, but Blythe’s natural cadences – the way the words roll of his tongue – have an awful lot of oomph behind them. There’s also at least one song – seven minute album closer “Reclamation” – that does truly, absolutely kick ass, and stands up with the band’s best work (Meanwhile, two b-sides, “We Die Alone” and “Shoulder of Your God,” are actually superior to several of the songs that made the final cut. Why these tracks didn’t make it onto the album proper is yet another of Wrath‘s many head scratchers.)

What the listener is left with, then, is an album that rocks and is certainly enjoyable, but isn’t especially memorable. That might not seem like such a big deal coming from a lesser band, but this Lamb of Fucking God, fer Chrissakes; they’re supposed to be the premiere American metal band of the 21st century. Wrath isn’t a blight on their discography by any means, but it is their weakest album to date – a record that’s good when it could have been great.

metal hornsmetal hornsmetal hornsmetal horns half

(3 ½ out of 5 horns)

-AR

  • TheCount

    A lot of the things you’re saying make sense, and others are simply a matter of taste. Personally I think this album is a great step up from Sacrament without being a step backwards. And Randy’s lyrics are top notch I’d say, especially in Broken Hands and Grace, which is the main thing that worried me while waiting for this album because his lyrics sucked on Sacrament (the dude confessed to being absolutely blank and void of ideas for lyrics when they were making sacrament, just check “The making of…”)

    It’s a good review, although I don’t completely agree with it. My vote says 4 horns out of 5

  • Roman

    Agreed completely with this review. Reclamation is a masterpiece among the ass kicking but not quite as memorable tracks. However, the worst song has to be “Fake Messiah”, it just seemed lazy and uninspired.

  • Mike

    I was really disappointed with this album. I thought they showed a little bit of promise with Sacrament, but it all went out the window with this uninspired, lazy piece of garbage.

    1/5

  • taog36

    this album could have been alot better in about everyway, i hate the cleanish yell singing he does in songs like in your words, it sounds like butt and takes alot away from what could of been a good song

    • gibberish

      In your words sucked, but I thought it worked for Set to Fail

  • RayRay

    I have been saying since I first heard this album…it is missing something. Usually with a LOG release it stays on for months at a time. Safe to say this album will be passed over easily. There is nothing there that makes me want to keep listening. Sacrament grew on me with every listen and now I love it. Looks like Wrath will be thrown into the “mediocre” metal album pile.

  • Leprosy

    when i got this album i was really happy then i listened to it and i listened to it again to make sure my ears werent broken. i love LOG because they have heaviness and add in quick weird sounding riffs and on this album i couldnt find any; it just seems like a bunch of power chords over and over.

    the only thing it thought that was different from the rest of their albums is that on certain parts of different songs randy sounded like devin townsend. ex: the chorus of “set to fail”

  • http://www.myspace.com/somethinglikesweet CJ

    Well, I don’t really have much to say, because I’m actually waiting to purchase the album, but if the rest of the songs are as good as Set To Fail, then Lamb Of God have one helluva record on their hands.

  • da tr00f

    new american gospel and as the palaces burn were spectacular precisely because there were no choruses. since ashes of the wake, LOG have become a good deal more accessible, which isnt necessarily a bad thing, but they have certainly tempered their sound.

  • vegard

    with machine out of the picture i might actually like a LOG album again (their prime still being “as the palaces burn” imho). and the review really makes me interested in hearing this album…cool

  • Matt

    Kinda like what da tr00f said, this album seems to be more of a return to their earlier days, only with the beefier sound and more refined production of Ashes and Sacrament. Personally I think this is the perfect sound for them and I’m really digging the album, but I can get why people who’re bigger fans of their later output won’t like it as much.

  • kevin

    Gotta disagree, I think all of the choruses aside from set to fail, are good. And it’s interesting you would pick this album over the new God Forbid to critique their choruses. I think that has always been GF’s weak point.

  • http://www.myspace.com/damagedmike DamagedMike

    Maybe this is LoG’s version of St Anger. Their effort to quiet the haters who said they went soft with ‘Sacrement.’ Their rebuttal might be somewhat disjointed and leave long time fans scratching their heads, but they will never please everyone. I’m not bothered by the lack of choruses (‘New American Gospel’ and ‘As the Palaces Burn’ were spectacular precisely because there were no choruses – da tr00f, exactly…I couldn’t have said it better), but the solos are a bummer. I think it is clear though that they set out to show the world they can make a “brutal”/aggressive album while signed to a major label. I think Ashes of the Wake is a classic, but they were trending towards getting softer and more popular and with the way MetalSucks has hyped Earthsblood…I’m really beginning to think they and most of their readers like softer, trendy, more popular stuff. However, in their efforts to showcase such brutality they may have over looked the nuances (the solos) that made them great. If the goal was to be more aggressive than ‘Sacrament,’ their goal was achieved. I don’t think ‘Wrath’ (I have heard it more than once)is a bad album and I do believe it is better than ‘Sacrament,’ which I think is their weakest effort to date. I like this one enough to actually buy a copy and these days, that is saying a lot. I think if the mainstream is disappointed with this album, then they have done a great job.

  • kevin

    And I agree this sounds more like As the Palaces Burn than ashes or sacrament, and I’m happy about that.

  • anathema

    so there aren’t great choruses on this album? doesn’t that make it NOT mainstream/selling out?

    don’t agree with you about the choruses – some, like set to fail and broken hands, are unbelievably catchy.

    this album, to me, seems to be a slightly more experimental/tinkered with formula album than sacrament or ashes. good progression, but they still havent done anything to blow my socks off like ashes did.

  • http://www.radioactivesandwich.com slice two

    i’ve been disappointed with most of LoG’s output since as the palaces burn. this one was really lame though, not only won’t i buy it, but i even deleted the downloaded copy of it. no need to take up space with something i won’t listen to!

  • sven

    I can’t believe the accolades that Sacrament seems to receive. That CD broke my heart with its thematic juvenality and chronic overuse of the ‘F’ word. If I was 12 years old I would’ve loved it. Break out the flame hoodie and chain wallet.

    Everything I’ve heard off this one is a vast improvement.

  • Jesse

    Well, in my opinion, any Lamb of God album is better than almost everything out there right now. I really loved Sacrament which is my least favorite album by Log and, I love Wrath about the same. I think most of this review is based on taste, although there were some good points.

  • Pesely

    dudes, this is some of the best LoG shit i have heard in awhile. Sacrament was pretty generic in my opinion, but this one definitely has some strong tunes on it. i’m not sure if i would pick it up, but it definitely has a lot of great shit on it. there’s way too many good metal records this year anyway..

    SLAYER

  • http://www.myspace.com/orchids Daisy May Tinklepants

    Good album to drink beer and party with. Not a whole lot of depth, but it definitely has some of the classic l.o.g. hooks and monster riffs

    confusing review- the dude shits all over the album, but still gives it a high score. make up your mind!

  • Motoghost

    The only thing that would make me happier with this interview is if it said the Adler bros were leaving and LoG was breaking up. Sacrament was one of the worst releases I heard in 2007 if it didn’t have Pathetic, it may as well have not been released. Screw LoG!

  • uglymicrowave

    ASHES OF THE WAKE and AS THE PALACES BURN…are there best efforts to date…this one was lacking that OOMPH i need from lamb of god….every album they have put out i have used in my workout ipod playlist…but wrath is defintly not a workout worthy album…ive had the cd for a while now and ‘in your words’ is just on repeat when i do play it…I’m already waiting for a new LOG record….but its gonna suck if they stay on this path

  • ryan

    Horrible review! this album has been stuck in my head since i got it.

  • Bob

    Horridly written review! Go back to Junior College! Seriously. Make up your damn mind! Maybe you just are not intelligent? Too much leaf or something. Damn. This site is the most biased metal site on the internet, I am not talking about subjective reviews of albums. In relation to specific bands, however, certain bands with get snubbed just for the fact they do not fit the criteria that Metalsucks deems “Acceptable Metal.”

  • Bob

    Am I alone on this?

  • mark james

    it’s definitely a step up from Sacrament. “Grace” is an amazing track as is “Reclamation”. “Set to Fail” is killer and “The Passing” is a great transition into “In Your Words”. I think the only weak song has to be “Contractor” just by its lyrics.

  • Anthony

    Umm, weren’t you and Vince praising the hell out of this album when you first heard it?

  • http://www.myspace.com/damagedmike DamagedMike

    Bob Says: Am I alone on this?
    No Bob, you are not.

    Anthony Says: Umm, weren’t you and Vince praising the hell out of this album when you first heard it?

    Yes, they were.

  • jacob

    @ bob:
    do they fucking claim to be unbiased, like newspapers are supposed to be? fuck no, they claim to be a blog. a personal thing with personal opinions. grow the fuck up, if you don’t like it find a different blog to read.

  • http://www.metalsucks.net Vince Neilstein

    @ bob and @ damagedmike: No, actually, we weren’t:
    http://www.metalsucks.net/2009/01/13/vinces-initial-reactions-to-lamb-of-gods-wrath/
    2nd paragraph.

    Also, keep in mind that Axl and I are two different people with sometimes differing opinions. But for the record, I 100% agree with Axl’s above review.

  • KH

    So you begrudge LOG for indulging in experimentation? You imply this with the dismissive “LoG aren’t some experimental metal band.” Such a statement, as well as the rest of the review, indicate that Wrath simply fails to meet your expectations of what LOG should be. So: why are you standing still while the band progresses?

  • http://www.metalsucks.net Axl Rosenberg

    @ KH: No, but I begrudge you for indulging in idiocy.

    Where did I say I don’t want them to experiment? What I said, in very plain English, is that there’s no indication in any sense that the band had any intention of making an experimental album. The album sounds of more or less like LoG – except the choruses and the hooks aren’t as memorable. I’d apologize for not conveying that clearly in my review, but re-reading it, I think I explain it pretty clearly; you deliberately miss my point because my review simply fails to meet your expectations of what a Wrath review should be (e.g., a review that features no actual thinking or criticism whatsoever, just blind praise).

    So: why are you leaving comments when you should be taking a course in reading comprehension?

  • Vertebrae

    Too much mid tempo “choruses”.

    Lots of predictable breakdowns.

    Repetitive song structures.

    The only song that is truly amazing is Reclamation.

    This guys reached their top with Ashes Of The Wake.

  • o0Stacey0o

    Love the new album. Thats all.

  • JD

    has anyone every thought that the band made the album that they wanted to and could care less what other people think about it?

  • http://www.myspace.com/damagedmike DamagedMike

    Vince,

    My apologies for getting your early thoughts on Wrath wrong.

    The review is a decent review, I just don’t completely agree it is a difference of opinions.

    I guess I’ve just grown tired of the attitudes and tastes here. Don’t get me wrong, writing and objectionable review is damn near impossible. I like a review with passion whether it is for or against…just as long as the writer has a real opinion and clearly states it. Opinion and clarity are both present here.

    What I don’t care for is the overall lack of original content. Just about, everything here comes from another site’s posts. When you get the exclusives, you kick ass. Otherwise, you do half-assed reporting on stuff that previously reported on by others. There seems to be a lack of original commentary about such things too. There are enough reviews and generally aren’t that great…sorry if I offend. So yeah, maybe I do need to stop dropping by. I liked the originality and subversive-ness of your early days here.

    I think more than anything all of this is because I am now firmly part of the Old Fart crowd. When I was your age (guessing mid-twenties), I know I would have agreed with most of what you say and taken it as gospel.

    It’s all good.

    Time to move on…

  • http://myspace.com/killingallthatholdsyou Patrick

    *Ive never listened to an Lamb Of God record before and have only heard a few songs and am only reviewing after one listen*

    “The Passing” was a competent opener. I’m never a huge fan of intros though.

    “In Your Words” is awesome. I like Randy’s vocal delivery. More “progressive” then most of their stuff that I have heard. Lyrics are decent to good. (10/10)

    “Set To Fail” has an awesome and catchy riff. And I think the chorus is strong. Solo is tasteful and well placed. Lyrics are decent to good. A tad bit repetitive. (9/10)

    “Contractor” reminds me weirdly of Bleeding Through, maybe just in tempo. Lyrically an interesting topic that most people dont know about. Love the lyrics. Dont like the gang vocals in the beginning. Songs progressively gets better as it goes. Weak chorus. (8/10)

    “Fake Messiah” has good drums and riffs. Weakest chorus so far. Weakest song so far. I do like the last minute. Each song so far has at least one fantastic part in it. (7/10)

    “Grace” starts awesome. I am agreeing with the review for the most part. The chorus’s are weak and some of the lyrics are lackadaisical. This song is the weakest actually IMO and is not memorable. (6.5/10)

    “Broken Hands” has good lyrics and a good bouncing riff. The melodic guitar is sweet too. The chorus is the worse part and thought it could of been shortened. (8/10)

    “Dead Seeds” is a great song. I really like the guitar parts and drums. The lyrics grab me, but I don’t really know why. Randy is great in the song and yay!, a good chorus. (9/10)

    “Everything To Nothing” is a very thrashy song. Fast drumming is very nice. Chorus is strong again. A good breakdown that sounds familar but not stale. The lyrics are decent. Guitar solo is alright. And again I think it could of ended about a minute before it does. (8/10)

    “Choke Sermon” wasnt very memorable. Probably the least memorable track IMO. (6.5/10)

    “Reclamation” intro wouldnt sound out of place on a Godsmack record (hey, I’m just saying…). The dissonant riff is good. Not a huge fan of the talking parts. The riffs and chord progressions are great. A good way to end the album. (8/10)

    Having never heard any other Lamb Of God albums I am free of bias. If this was a debut album, it would be amazing. They have a cool sound that is plenty heavy, and at times can be techinical and the splashes of melody are good. “Wrath” is not the most diverse album, and every song basically is the same tempo and structure. The chorus’s could of been stronger and it could of been a little bit more diverse but overall it’s a good heavy album with a shit load of riffs, and I think that is exactly what they were going for. It is what it is, and if you love meat and potatoes metal then this is your cup of tea. It didnt turn me into a fan but I can now recommend then to someone as a competent heavy band. Overall: (7.5/10)

  • NuMallCore Pwns YoMama

    Am I the only one around here who hasn’t heard the album because I’m actually waiting for the album to come out?

    I like the two songs that I’ve indulged in so far. If its more raw than Sacrament, I’ll be happy.

  • Aya

    Well, I personally like it coz they tried something new yet didn’t stray away from their roots…For me, a good album should reflect experiences or emotions at the time it was written and recorded. It’s kinda like a photograph of who you were at that point in time. Music, after all, is all about feelings…Wrath turns out to be something that all the members are very happy with, so why are we so sure that their music should sound like that not stuff of this kind?

  • john

    i thought it was a pretty decent album, almost the same level as sacrament but still not the next step up that was promised. Grace was a pretty sick song though :D

  • MetalMeatHammer

    This is what happens when we get too giddy and over hype an album. We shoot down a great album because it’s not the best thing we have ever heard. Axl’s review is just seeping with arrogance, trying to make us believe his ability to interpret and critique an album is above all, yet he fails miserably. In order to produce an objective view you have to try and listen with absolutely zero expectations and it’s clear in reading this that’s too much to ask. Loved sacrament but this definitely surpasses it. 4.5/5

  • earthsherm

    i dont know what you guys are talking about, this record is heavier, riffier and all together better than sacrament at the very least, thanksyou lamb of god for going back a few steps

  • Jesse

    Damn Vince, do you really agree with Axl’s review 100%? I was actually looking forward to your review…damn that sucks.

  • masterjake5000

    This has to be the worst fucking review i have ever read…..this guy is a dumshit. everyone wants log to sound like they did at a certain point in their career….its called evolving. chris adler said this album would surprise alot of people and apparently it did by reading what everyone has to say. And if you guys are so worried about fucking choruses and not the talented vocals, drumming, and guitar work go listen to limp bizcuit.

    • Abyss

      i know man they are compltely retarded or something

  • KH

    @ Axl: Touched a nerve, eh? Interesting. But I think you’re missing MY point, actually. Throughout the review you bemoan the lack of anthemic choruses at those points where you think there should be such a chorus; instead you get what you call “plateaus” and a “bizarre approach to songwriting.” Did it occur to you that this is 1) precisely what I mean by experimentation, and 2) exactly what the band intended, as part of a move AWAY from the usual verse-chorus-verse-chorus arrangements? (A move toward prog, if anything).

    You expected anthems, and you didn’t get them. Is that clear enough?

  • http://DarkTwinCities.com devil

    To me it seems like the horns designation reflects a general like for the band overall while the review seems to reflect something significantly less.

    My own feeling is that this is their weakest release and coming off Sacrament, which was their weakest release until now, that’s not a good thing. About the only thing I like about Wrath is Adler’s mega-intense drumming, but even that suffers from the Lars Ulrich tin can “ping” that made St. Anger so fucking irritating. The drumming is great but the drums sound like shit.

    Blythe is a great vocalist but the guy really has nothing to say. He’s damn good at saying it though.

    Every one of these songs is instantly forgettable. Even the last one, which is basically just two riffs repeated endlessly in an overlong song. The lack of solos makes it seem like Morton just phoned it in. While Sacrament seemed like the band was reaching for more accessibility and greater success (which I find a little disgusting but hey, it’s their prerogative) this seems like a band reaching back for what built their fanbase and completely forgetting how they originally did it. It’s actually kind of a sad and pathetic album as a result, hence not worthy of more than one horn(s), if that. And yeah, I love LOG. But since Palaces they’ve been slowly yet steadily going downhill. I really wish they’d find their mojo again.

  • http://www.last.fm/user/groverXIII groverXIII

    Personally, I really liked the new album. While there is a lack of guitar solos, it never really stood out to me. I definitely like the album more than Sacrament, and at least as much as Ashes of The Wake (As The Palaces Burn is still my favorite).

    I’d give it a 4 at least, maybe a 4.5.

  • http://www.myspace.com/damagedmike DamagedMike

    Man, I told myself I wasn’t going to bother with this anymore, but I can’t let it go. The band did not announce to the world they were writing, recording and releasing an experimental album. They have always been pretty tight lipped about upcoming releases. So what? I think the band returned to a more aggressive sound like that of ‘New American Gospel’ and ‘As the Palaces Burn’, but experimented with how they could change that up. That does not make this and experimental album. Grow up. The band obviously has. The album sounds sonically great. The production values are top notch. Bringing the bass up in the mix was an excellent decision. Randy Blythe may not be a lyrical genius (by now we all know better than to expect that), but he is constantly improving as a vocalist with each release. I don’t think he sounds like anyone else. He and the band have a very unique and distinctive sound. You know who it is as soon as you hear it. Yeah, they tinker with things, but otherwise they would go stale. Anyone who is disappointed that this is not an extension of the direction they took with ‘Sacrament’ should just walk away quietly. And to them I say you never “got” the band in the first place. My opinion of ‘Wrath’ is becoming increasingly more positive with each listen. I think the band has made the right album at the right time.

    For sure, more guitar soloing would have been nice, but I think this is a wholly effective album as is. They have shown than they can mix it up and make it punishing without going over the top. I’m willing to bet that they did not set out to write/make an album with a minimal amount of solos. It just happened.

    I really don’t get the bitch about the choruses though. This album succeeds for the very reasons God Forbid’s ‘Earthsblood’ falls short (an album this site has, in my book, officially over-hyped). GF has used the sibling harmony, chorus thing to the point of sounding forced and tried….and tired.

    Lamb of God have stripped away the excesses. If you want to call it “meat and potatoes metal” than so be it. Cutting out the excess these days is a good thing…no matter what we are talking about.

    I think their choice for ‘Wrath’ is exceptionally fitting. Think about it some and then listen to it again with an open mind and ears. It does not disappoint.

    If the intent of the review here was to let people know you like the album, but wish things were somewhat different, you did a pour job communicating that because your review does not support your rating.

    I’d would give ‘Wrath” a solid 4/5.

  • Jesse

    Right on DamagedMike, but I don’t understand everybody’s problem with Mark and Randy’s lyrics. I mean come on, have you guys read the lyrics to Omerta, Bootscraper, or Beating on Deaths Door? The lyrics on Wrath are good as far as I can make out….except Contractor. Lol

  • Blackthorned

    Maybe Mark Morton made the decision not to play a guitar solo in every song. Crazy notion.

    But you actually think the bonus songs are superior to several of the album tracks? Interesting/bizarre tastes you have but it keeps things interesting here for sure.

    And at least you have the God Forbid album to fawn over instead.

  • Symbiot

    I don’t understand why people say Fake Messiah has a weak chorus. It’s been stuck in my head since I heard it. That, Broken Hands, and Reclamation are amazing. The album as a whole isn’t as good as past albums, but still, it’s at least a 4 out of 5.
    I actually like the change in pace and less solos. It makes things less predictable.

  • Owen

    While I could agree with a 3 and a half star review on the points scale, I wouldnt rate any LoG album anything over 4, there’s no nostalgia here and their new effort has a few standout tracks and a lot of filler, as with most of their other lp’s.

    But seriously, if you guys jizz all over Earthsblood, and to be honest we’ve been seeing the pre-cum for months now, then it will be the most pathetic orgasm since Bill Clinton took it up the Lewinsky.

    Yeah. Really. That bad.

  • dthrasher

    WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!?!? You only gave this album a 3.5/5 on your completely subjective ratings scale? I can’t believe you are too fucking stupid to realize that this album is a 4/5 you fucking morons. I will never read this site again because you guys are pieces of shit who don’t 100% agree with the fact that Lamb of God are the most amazing band ever in the history of time and more important to my life than breathing. Fuck you.

  • Jesse

    Where did my third comment go? Is there a limit to comments posted or something?

  • Kip Wingerschmidt

    I too pretty much agree with your thoughts on this album –Wrath is a really big disappointment after Sacrament and never seems to go anywhere (which hardly makes an album “experimental”, btw)– but yeah I was actually kinda surprised by your horns rating….2 or 2.5, methinx. True, Randy’s vocal range is evolving with each release, and there’s a few decent riffs here and there (and a couple very solid songs from start to finish), but this record is mostly forgettable….it doesn’t own the whole way through like a LoG album should.

  • Kip Wingerschmidt

    I too pretty much agree with your thoughts on this album –Wrath is a really big disappointment after Sacrament and never seems to go anywhere (which hardly makes an album “experimental”, btw)– but yeah I was actually kinda surprised by your horns rating….2 or 2.5, methinx. True, Randy’s vocal range is evolving with each release, and there’s a few decent riffs here and there (and a couple very solid songs from start to finish), but this record is mostly forgettable….it doesn’t own the whole way through like a LoG album should, especially at this point in their career.

  • Kip Wingerschmidt

    Whoops….that comment went thru twice, sorry y’all!

  • Relaxiknowarchie

    I couldn’t get into it at first listen. Maybe it was from it being a departure from Sacrament and sonically huger than the previous releases. I gave it a few days and then realized I had “Fake Messiah” playing in my minds evil jukebox. That was it. Every song clicks with me now. I think that one song is my fav and then the next one plays and I think “no THIS is my favorite song” to each and every song.

    I’ll be the first to admit I have drank quite heavily from the cup of Lamb of God. I’ve followed them right from the MP3dotCOM days and introduced their musical mastery to all of my metal loving friends who are all as rabid fans as I am.

    This album is by far the best thing they have released. This is the next level of Lamb of God. I am not disappointed. With Randy now sober I can feel the lyrics more than ever. His vocals are like no other. Chris’ drumming is unnaturally phenomenal and the riffs are making my neck hurt from banging my head.

    You know how sometimes you listen to music and you get that chill or goosebumps cause you get it? this does that to me.

    I’ll give it 5 fuck you Axl out of 5

    ps I wonder what the Mastodon release will have for a review from Axl?

  • http://www.myspace.com/somethinglikesweet CJ

    Ok, seriously, this is getting ridiculous. It’s ok to respectfully disagree with a man’s opinion, even encouraged for the sake of good debate, but there have been way too many attacks on this review just because Axl has a different opinion than some of the rest of us. Just fuckin’ accept his ideas, then tell us your own. We don’t need things like “5 fuck you Axl out of 5″. That’s not metal. Just childish and immature. If you don’t like the fuckin’ review after you read it, just say “I didn’t like the fuckin’ review after I read it” and fuckin’ drop it. Fuck.

  • relaxiknowarchie

    I didn’t like the review

    fuck you axl

  • The Dub

    I’m not sure I get all the hand-wringing over the new album. It does exactly what it’s supposed to do, at the right moment in time.

    Yes, NAG and ATPB were far and away mind-blowing albums, and frankly the best stuff metal has seen in the past 8 (oops, now 9) years. But let me ask this…what would we be saying now if Wrath sounded like either one of those two? “Oh, LoG hasn’t changed. The Adler brothers haven’t evolved. Randy still sounds like the Cookie Monster.” Puh-lease. Sometimes I wonder if a band is f*cked either way for putting out an album like Wrath. Damned if it sounds evolved, and damned if it doesn’t sound like your stuff from the early catalog.

    As for production value, I find it amusing that you have two camps … those that love Machine’s work (AOTW and Sacrament) and those that don’t (every other album). What’s even better is that those who *don’t* like Machine’s work often times state that AOTW is their favorite album. Go figure. Point being, the production here is top-notch, and an upped production does not mean the album becomes “more accessible” or “more slick” with “less hooks, choruses, or songwriting”. The simple fact is, playing in a garbage can does *not* make your album that much better (and really, let’s be honest, who here *wouldn’t* want to hear “Bootscraper” or “Blood Junkie” produced to LoG’s albums standards of today, as opposed to the low-budget production of ATPB?). Better production reflects a band with more capital investment and leverage with their labels. That usually means they’re doing something right.

    If anything, Wrath suffers from one problem … it’s too short. There’s a noticeable upbeat in the tempo on this album, and the tracks move along fairly fast. I think this is where most people will find fault with Wrath. Just as it gets going and they’re about to hook themselves into the song, the album suddenly comes to an end.

    One other observation I’d like to make. It’s very easy for all of us to judge an album against the past of its band (I’m no exception here, as I thought Slipknot’s “All Hope Is Gone” was an utter mess against its predecessors). However, take a look around the metal industry today. Who else is producing such a comprehensive outing as Wrath? Isn’t this what metal is all about in the end, too? Pushing the bar against what is out today and what will come tomorrow.

    4.5/5.0. You’ll be missing out on one of the great albums of 2009 if you don’t give this a spin.

  • elvispresley

    really how grow up man can consider this as music?

    Its so boring and repetitive.

  • suicidesaints

    this album is sick — i love every second of it — ive been a LOG fan since gospel and this might be there best overall release yet — sacrament was good (although my least favorite) but this is great

    i rank the album in this order (my personal preference) FAVORITE TO LEAST FAVORITE (although every LOG album is 10000x better than 90% of any other metal albums to come out in the last 10 years)

    1. Gospel
    2. Palaces
    3. Ashes/Wrath
    4. Sacrament

  • http://www.themetalreporter.net TMR

    When you compare it to Lamb Of God’s previous work, you might be left with a few disappointing factors (keep in mind your keeping a certain level of expectation towards their work, and to alot since the release of Ashes Of The Wake) but if you compare this album to the other releases by bands around right now (dont get me started on the amount of rehashed BULL FUCKING SHIT people call metal these days, if each band just comes up with the shit formula passed around nowadays…it might aswell turn into a night with a dj, spinning remixes of classic metal with a lonely drunk growling to it) this is one hell of a “solid as FUCK” album.

    I had the album on repeat for a while… one thing is for sure, I wouldn’t even consider comparing this album to God Forbid’s Earthsblood… with all do respect for God Forbid, but these guys are not even in the same league as Lamb Of God…

    Randy, alone is enough to prove my point…

    That doesnt mean I’m not a fan of some of God Forbid’s work…. but in my opinion there is no comparing.

    One thing is for certain, I enjoyed Wrath and I know with more listens it’ll either grow on me more, or I’ll be missing Ashes Of The Wake….

  • BloodJunkie

    Well I like this album anyway, it’s still far too early to say whether I prefer it to anything they’ve done in the past but it’s by no means regression.
    Being a guitarist, I’ve always prefered the sound like they had on Ashes and Sacrament with the clearer, polished tone so I can actually hear the intricate riffs, and this follows on well with that. But I also liked the agressiveness which was shown in ATPB and Gospel, but I couldn’t listen to those all way through because of the dirty, muddy guitar tone which just bugged the fuck outta me. Mark and Willie are a solidasfuck guitar team and havent failed me yet, and I think in terms, Wrath is eqivalent to a remastered version of ATPB or Gospel in that it captures all of the gritty, fast, angry riffs and playing off the first two albums, but with the clarity and good production of Ashes and Sacrament. Overall, Randy’s voice has taken many steps forward without going sideways or backwards. I love the variety that he uses in some songs, with pitch changes and an almost singing-voice quality to his screams, as opposed to the monotonous growls of earlier work which, don’t get me wrong – I loved, but it’s great to see him change it up a bit. As for John, his bass is a lot more audible on this and thats awesome, really makes it sound heavier than ever, along with Chris’s drumming which is phenominally hard hitting this time around, and theres something different about the drum mix on this record but i can’t quite figure what it is. I think its something along the lines of leaving the higher frequencies in the mix, and boosting the treble, because I cant hear the bass in the bass drums as much anymore, and the snare seems to be on its way to sounding like Lars Ulrich’s off St. Anger which ruined the sound more than anything else did. But thankfully, it doesn’t, and as of yet I have no major complaints or faults.
    The Passing is easily my favourite track right now, with a Metallica-esque acoustic beginning and an almost sorrowful sounding dual guitar lead part played over power chords. And I see lots more influences of Thrash throughout the record, in the form of epic song structures, and a lot of focus put into the first minute or so of a song with clean guitars, sound effects etc, rather than just jumping in with random riffs, screams and insane double bass flying around.
    On a final note, anyone who hasn’t yet checked out the competition the band is holding on their website, DO IT NOW!! It’s fucking insane, and definately worth a shot at entering.
    Also the new video for Set To Fail is up =]
    \m/ ^_^ \m/

  • derek

    its blowing my mind that people are calling this “trash” and “lazy”. even if u consider this lamb of god’s worst album, its still better than most shit nowadays. lamb of god isnt even close to being one of my favorite bands but i do think they are one of the most talanted metal bands in recent time. anyone who thinks otherwise is just another fuckin hater.

  • Tez

    i think people are looking at this album from two perspectives;
    firstly, from a musical perspective, it is an impressive album, but not one that stands out too much compared to older ones. this is not to say the music isn’t good, just a little less defined than the last albums, in particular Ashes of the Wake.
    secondly, and this is a perspective a lot of hardcore fans do not have…. is the fact that if you tune out, and turn off your ‘analytical LoG mode’, this album – as the band foretold – is just music that “makes you want to drive fast and hit stuff!”
    in conclusion, a lot of people are overcomplicating this album in terms of musical prowess, where it’s just meant to be a good fun, fast drivin’ head bangin’ bunch of songs!

  • West Virginia

    i think people went into this album lookin for something but got something else.

    this album is pure fuckin metal, great fuckin metal. and to call it their weakest is fuckin crazy.
    this album is WAY fuckin better than Sacrament.
    this album is heavier than your fuckin sister.

  • hateuall

    this album wrath 3$

    to there younger days
    drums basic
    times basic
    guitar repeated
    vocals and writing sleepy
    I think the jump in record labels and money babied them out
    but I love there first two cds burn the priest and southern gospel

  • Brandon

    IMO, I think this album is fucking awesome! Overall I think its heavier and I am loving the new added acoustic intros! Great work! I don’t agree with this review at all! The solo’s on this album have stepped up 10 fold! Don’t get me wrong, I love his older solo’s but he has definitly stepped up his game! Great licks and he is doing some pretty nice shredding! He even does a sweep which is awesome! Never heard him do that before! The Vocals are great and I love the dirty vocals he does on “In your words” and the like! They are just another tool in his tool bag! The production is awesome! You can hear everything and it doesn’t sound over produced at all! In the Words of Mark Morton “People always want to keep you in their back pocket” “They always want you to put out the same album” “To those people, get your OWN fucking band” Perfectly said!!!! Stop thinking so much peeps and just feel the fucking groove! Great CD!!!!!!!

  • Yixin

    I don’t understand where all this hate is coming from. Wrath is pure, raw and brutal American Metal. It is loud, it is fast and it is heavy. There’s no pussy ass “clean vocals” crap on there, no wanna-be hardcore crap either, there is nothing pretentious about it. This is Lamb of God at its stripped down best. This is not the overproduced, top heavy Sacrament, this is not the light, almost metalcore-like Ashes of the Wake, this is Lamb of God as they were during As the Palaces Burn and A New American Gospel, except with something extra. Maybe it’s the heavier bass, Randy’s improved vocals or just LoG’s improved maturity as a band. Lamb of God has truly topped itself.

    This is Pure American Metal.

  • Bub

    I think if Mark Morton read the comments about lack of chorus he’d probly say “mission accomplished”….. I’ve loved all Lamb of God albums (sacrament took a while…had to see them play the songs live to really appreciate it)… this one hasn’t really sunk in yet until I heard reclemation… song straight up gives me shivers man, fucking love it! Then managed snag the two bonus tracks… blown away why “Shoulder of Your God” isn’t on this album!? it’s like they were trying to get away from that specific type of song writing… has to be my all time favorite Lamb of God song already

  • Impaled

    I think Sacrament was a piece of shit compared to the previous 2 records, and thus Wrath is great improvement and a step FORWARD not backwards as some seem to think.
    Also the more organic and less polished sounds are a nice suprise. Sacrament sounded overproduced and generic to me, but that is just my opinion.
    I think it’s stupid that some people on the internet seem to think that if you disagree with their opinons about LOG’s best albums you are a lesser/worse fan, that is just fucking ridiculous and very immature.
    I’d give Wrath 4/5

  • Dallas

    I disagree completely , wtf is wrong with you man? Seriously you need some paxil or something.

  • smk

    At First i loved it sooooo much it just blew my fucking mind, but then i realized what will happen in a month or two.

    One problem with this new album; it has a significant amount of awesomeness riding on melody n tune n shit, instead of straight intense riffs.

    look at Ashes and palaces burn, even years after they came out i can listen to the whole thing through over and over again and not get tired, simply becoz they dont have a real tune to em, theyr jus heavy as shit.

    The new album feels overproduced in the musical department compared to other LoG albums, and that makes me sad, because i know that this new stuff will not have the staying power as previous works. It could be the clear lyrics, dunno. The new sound just seems a bit more muddled and radio-ized with the big bassline, rather than the rawness of previous albums.

    I mean look at Laid to Rest or Faded Line, or 11th Hour, or Blood of the Scribe, very simplistic tunes to em, with heavy riffing and then it all climaxes and its like omfgownage, but i never really felt any of that in Wrath.

    I;d say 3.5/5 is right about spot on, and yes, those 2 bonus tracks are by far superior to contractor, choke sermon, and everything to nothing. Contractor is a hell of a song after like 1:40 though, just the beginning is weak.

  • #1 LOG fan

    I am getting so tired of all of you mother fuckers squandering the petty differences of each lamb of god album. every log album is sick as fuck; each log album has its own unique originality, which makes log one of the best metal bands ever. the only reason that anyone one would not like a particular log album is because, its not what YOU wanted to hear. all of the lamb of god albums make you headbang like a mother fucker, and if it dosent then you are not a true fan of metal

  • devouredbymetal

    agreed with #1 LOG fan..sure makes you headbang….kick ass tracks mastered fully…guess they tried something new…more raw approach than the previous album..dead seeds is one blasting track….yeah!!!!!!! think the anthem track from this albums gonna be the contractor…everything to nothing truly truly truly kicks some ass….

  • B

    Oh my god…. It’s called technology. Allows bands to achieve more sounds they are going for, with the equipment available today. Alot of Metal Bands have been trending toward the cleaner ‘face melting’ riffs with newer albums. Get over it, let the genre progress. There is more out there than just distortion. And to the person who wrote this review… Fuck you man

  • LoG

    come on now, i dont give a damn if they dont have may choruses, every song on that album is awesome, definetly their best.

  • LoG

    come on now, i dont give a damn if they dont have may choruses, every song on that album is awesome, definetly their best. I agree with Dallas.

  • cody

    i like the album, but the lyrics fuckin suck, vocals good, lyrics suck. chris adler is still christ, the guitars still kick ass, but fuck the lyrics, only contractor has the word fuck in it and that just pisses me off. Its a bad comparison because Slipknot was on the verge of selling out for a while but thats kind of how i feel with this shit Randy really toned it down on the aggressive lyrics which sucks. Choke Sermon is filthy as fuck though.

  • TheCount

    @Cody

    The fact that you think lyrics need to have the word fuck in them to be brutal means you don’t know shit. The lyrical themes themselves are meaningful and brutal, and extremely poignant. Lyrics on Sacrament are not up to par to anything else Randy has done, with the exception of Walk with me in Hell. Randy is back in form, better than ever, and to think otherwise is simply moronic.

  • http://staticseth.blogspot.com/ Seth

    With the exception of the first track, the instrumental “The Passing,” Wrath really is brutally awesome from start to finish. Taking the album for what it is and not comparing to past efforts, it is well-deserved of 5 stars.

  • http://www.gofuckyourpopstars.com balls of internet

    some people have alot of nerve, go fuck yourselves and show some respect to the guy that did the review, even if he had rated it 2 1/2. it would not change my opinion of this album. yes sacrament is a bigger commercial success so fucking what, atleast the band still makes a good fucking record and keeps it heavy. fuck your popstars, we need more metal.

    BALLS

  • Jason

    First of all, “balls of internet,” just because someone took the time to write a shitty review, doesn’t mean they deserve respect. It’s like saying you have to respect G.W. Bush for taking the time out of his schedule to govern the country. That’s a load of shit. Some people look at reviews as a guideline to figure out if they should buy it. I’m sure everyone who read the review had already heard Wrath and already had their opinion set in stone before waiting for some quasi-biased, half-ass music snob to shit on their(our) own personal opinion. My problem is not with the opinion of the writer, but merely with the sad attempt at rating music as to help others know about the album. People do like to read positive things, and repeatedly shitting on Wrath and then trying to cover up your distaste with insincere compliments is proof that you shouldn’t be writing fucking reviews. All your shitty writing says is that you really didn’t like Wrath, but because you know so many people who do, you’d better be “that guy” who has something bad to say about it just so you can disagree. What a shithead

  • Jesse

    Haven’t had the internet for a few weeks so I apologize for the tardy comment.

    I just picked this one up a few days ago, and I think it’s a big step up from Sacrament. Sure Sacrament was good, but it seemed like they were going in a direction that they weren’t really meant to go in. Now when I listen to Wrath, I hear a new direction in pretty much every aspect of the music(i.e. Drop C in a couple songs? Randy’s new techniques, John’s more outstanding contributions, and who the hell knew Mark Morton even owned an acoustic?), and I like it. I agree with Axl’s review for the most part. But I do have to point out that Mark Morton has shined more than ever in this album. You’d have to be deaf to not catch the ever improving lead work that man displays on Wrath. His past solos, excluding the one on Walk With Me in Hell, have all been somewhat lacluster but have always been overshadowed and compensated for by the outstanding rythm guitar him and Willie Adler have always been known for. The song structures are a little predictable and even some of the riffs sound familiar from previous albums, which is almost excusable seeing that the riffs they recycled are from albums most people in their current fanbase haven’t heard before.

    I’m leaning more towards 4/5 on this one, which for a 5/5 band like Lamb of God is only a disappointment in contrast with their previous work.

  • Skitz

    Ok, I don’t own any Lamb of God CDs, which is the best of the lot? I get the feeling there’s a big division of opinions….

  • BillB

    Have any of you motherfuckers dissing this album actually Seen Lamb Of OH MY FUCKING GOD live, the intensity and ferocity is enough to give a corpse an orgasm. Conractor, first heard on the “Defenders of the Faith” UK tour brought the house down, Gauranfuckingteed is going in the Collins English Dictionary in 2009 as a statement of intent, replacing Dead Right and Deffo. Contractor will be the one that has the monster Mosh Pits windmillers breaking arms, noses and legs and fucking loving it. Grace has turned a few into Lamb Of God fans, fucking awesome. 5/5 for me.

  • Mike

    First off i wanna say i’m a huge fan of lamb of god, own all their albums and know everysong forwards and backwards. Been to a few of their concerts and love their work.

    But was really dissapointed with WRATH. I’m not gonna say i agree with everything the review stated but hell, compared to their other albums its trash. as the palaces burn was heavy and loved that the vocals werent all crystal clear, made it fun listening to the songs over and over and better understand the meaning. AOTW was damn good too. I guess this is where i get confused… why the fuck is everyone saying SACRAMENT was their worst album? fuck that, sacrament had a lot of balls. Pathetic, blacken the cursed sun? anyone there? christ… Maybe i was expecting too much off this album, or maybe i’m not ready to accept the style change but w/e it is its not the same lamb of god for me. And those of you who are bashing on the guy who wrote the review, he was just giving his rating if u dont like it SHUT THE FUCK UP and just voice your own opinion. no need to be disrespectful, everyone has their opinion.

  • Ryan

    This album is kick ass i also hated the review fuck you axl youre an idiot.

  • trav

    i was seriuosly disapointed with the new album.. the only half desent songs on there was reclamation and dead seeds.. by far they”re worst album…

  • RekOne

    If you check the interview with LOG about their last album.. they state that they had their fun with this album, they did the things they wanted to do for the longest on this album. Every artist will have that set of tracks that appease them because of their personal interests and will somehow not appease the masses as much because it wasn’t “extraordinary” like their preceding albums. I like the album alot; the fact that they were willing to put out a different approach on record was pretty cool.

  • blank

    i dont know what fuckin album you listened to but it definitely wasnt wrath by lamb of god. that album is fucking bad as fuck and this is the first negative thing i have ever seen about the album. i know im nearly two years behind on this discussion but you people are fucking retarded. this album could not have been more badass!!!

  • Abyabyss

    all of you fucking people who think Wrath sucks just because it has weak choruses
    and not good lyrics
    FUCK YOU THEN!!!
    because if you say “ if it does’nt have some good choruses then i won’t like it”
    your retarded or if you’re a metalhead then you’re a poser
    Randy’s lyrics are weird but to me they said unique and awesome when he sings
    and the chorus doesn’t have to be how you want it to be even if it makes it more
    awesome but that’s the way they want the songs
    you make a big deal about it and it’s not even close to be worse then the other albums
    they are all awesome and i love all the songs maybe some a bit more but it would be
    4.5 to 5 rating
    so grow up, metal is evolving
    and just because the old stuff was awesome you don’t like the new stuff
    just because the old stuff was new to everyone and got surprised
    since it was a whole new type of music and then the same music in the future
    but not so surprising, you think it’s lame now,
    technology it’s getting better and better and awesome
    and like this album and other albums been different it’s getting lamer and lamer for you
    what the FUCK is wrong with you
    and also because some people like sticking with the past they like living in the past
    get your ass up and get into the new world
    and i have to add Wrath is my favorite album it’s as good as
    NEW AMERICAN GOSPEL
    AS THE PALACES BURN
    ASHES OF THE WAKE
    and SACRAMENT
    you retarded mother fuckers
    i actually would give it a completely **5** stars
    to it
    it doesn’t need full chorus or really good lyrics or long fucking solos
    at least short solos are good enough
    and if you reply me to a negative comment i probably won’t
    read it and be laughing at you
    the last thing i really enjoy saying to those people is
    FUCK YOU!!!!
    FUCK YOU!!!!
    FUCK YOU!!!!
    FUCK YOU!!!!
    suck my dick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!